ELEMENT 3 : INTENTION TO CREATE LEGAL RELATIONSHIP Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Esso Petroleum v commissioners of customs and excise

A
  • Esso would give a coin (footballer’s face on 1 side and “esso” on the other side) to customers for every 4 gallons of petrol
  • it is free gift and legally binding

(intention to create legal relation)

(Commercial Agreement)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Edwards v Skyways

A
  • The airplane company had mentioned of giving ex gratia payment to employees who choose to resign
  • a pilot had done that but didn’t received any payment. (company refused to pay)
  • held that the agreement said between the airline company wasn’t domestic and have intention to create legal relation.

(intention to create legal relations)

(Commercial Agreement)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Balfour v Balfour

A
  • husband worked abroad
  • wife stayed in England
  • husband promised to pay wife an allowance of 30 per week
  • HE DID NOT
  • held that it was purely domestic

(Domestic Agreement)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Jones v Padavatton

A
  • a mother agreed to pay a daughter allowance when she went to England to study for bar
  • she would go to Trinidad once she qualified
  • mother bought house and supplement
  • daughter didn’t do any those stuff
  • mother got repossession of the house

(Domestic Agreement)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Wilson v Burnett

A
  • 3 woman attended a bingo game
  • two people said that they should share any prize above 10
  • one of them won 100 000
  • evidence not conclusive
  • no contract was form because it was purely domestic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Appleson v Littlewoods and Jones v Vernon Pools

A
  • the claimant had filled in 2 coupons that states “binding in honour only”
  • claimant couldn’t claim prize money
  • there was no intention to create legal relation
  • rebuttal presumption
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Rose & Frank v J R Crompton & Bros

A
  • an American company and British company had entered into a sole agency agreement for the sale of paper
    -a written agreement (1913) stated it was not a formal or legal contract and “honourable pledge”
  • British cancel the agreement due to it not being binding
  • no legal contract
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Merrit v Merrit

A
  • husband and wife are divorced
  • they once jointly owned a house
  • she requested that if she had payed the balance of the mortgage, the house’s name is only her
    -once paid, the ex husband appealed saying it was purely domestic agreement between husband and wife
  • held since they are no longer spouses, domestic agreement doesn’t apply
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Simpkins v Pays

A
  • a lodger and 2 members of a household entered into a newspaper competition
  • the payment fee was paid equally but the entry made under the lodger’s name
  • the agreement was made that they would share the winnings
    -won 750 but lodger refused to pay
  • held it was bound by the agreement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly