Electronic apex locators Flashcards
Determination of working length
To effectively undertake a root canal treatment, the
clinician must accurately determine the ap`ical limit of the root canal system as well as the position of the
canal terminus
Studies have shown that root fillings which extend
beyond the apex or are more then 2mm short of the apex are associated with a higher chance of failure
Anatomical apex definition
The end of the root as determined from a macro perspective
Not particularly useful as it doesn’t take into account the micro anatomy
Radiographic apex definition
Similar to the anatomical apex, but as determined by radiography
Inaccurate, as the foramen is often located to one side of the radiographic apex
This often varies from 0.3-0.6mm but can be up to 3mm
Deposition of cementum at the apex can cause further discrepancies
Pathology, such as external resorption can also change the position of the foramen
Major apical constriction
The widest point of the foramen where it exists the root Considered to be entirely within cementum Not an ideal point to finish a root filling as it does not produce a natural stop for the filling material
Minor apical constriction
The narrowest point of the
foramen, also known as the
apical constriction
The cementum narrows up from the major apical foramen to the minor apical foramen
The location is variable (in some canals it may not even be present)
Usually 0.5-1mm short of the radiographic apex
At (or close to) the point where the cementum fuses with the dentine (CDJ)
CDJ definition
The point where the cementum fuses with the radicular dentine
Considered to be the point where the root canal system finishes and periodontium begins
Considered to be the ideal limit of an RCT
However:
Can only be detected histologically
Can be irregular – one side may be up to 3mm higher than the other
Therefore not considered a practical landmark to use in endo
Which landmark should we use
The minor apical constriction is the narrowest point of the root canal system and forms a good
natural barrier
Consistent anatomical reference point
Most practical landmark
Different minor apical constrictions
Can vary in anatomy
- traditional single constriction
- tapering constriction
- multiconstricted
- parallel constriction
Methods for determining working length
Tactile feedback from instruments
The paper point technique
Radiographic determination of working length
Electronic apex locators
Tactile feedback
Tactile sensation is an essential aspect of endodontic treatment
However, even experienced endodontists could only detect the apical constriction in 60% of cases by tactile sensation alone
Made even more complicated by sclerosis, resorption and anatomical differences
Not a recommended technique for determining WL
The paper point technique
Based on premise that the root canal system of an uninfected tooth is dry whilst the periodontium is wet (hydrated tissue)
The wet/dry interface is therefore used as the
reference point
Paper points are placed at incrementally shorter lengths until no moisture is detected
Can be useful for teeth with open apices or
abnormal apical anatomy
However, complicated by apical exudate in infected cases and when patency is not achieved
No good evidence to support the use of this
technique
Radiographic determination of WL
Probably most commonly used technique for determining working length
Must be undertaken with paralleling technique
Uses the premise that the apical constriction is on average 0.5-1mm short of
the radiographic apex
This is inherently flawed however as apical constriction can be significantly further away resulting in over-instrumentation of apex
Can be difficult to determine due to
overlying structures or superimposition of
canals
Exposes pt to ionising radiation
Electronic apex locators
Have become a commonly used method for WL determination
Modern apex locators are very reliable
Can be used in conjunction with other methods of WL determination, or if the
reading is reliable, can be used as the sole method of WL determination
Uses resistance/impedance of the root canal and PDL
red line –> deduct 0.5mm
How do electronic apex locators work?
Electrical circuit is
formed, starting at the AL,
running through a clip on the file, through RC, through apical constriction, out the PDL and finally through mucosa and to clip on the pt’s lip and back to the AL, completing circuit
The tooth can be thought of as a capacitor
Dentine and cementum are insulators of current
The PDL, apical constriction and file in
the canal are all conductors of electricity
The advancing file in the canal, and the PDL will act as conductors in the capacitor
The dentine, cementum (and any associated fluid) will act as the insulator
First generation apex locators
Resistance-based apex locators
Resistance between an endodontic instrument at the apical foramen and an electrode on the oral mucosa is approximately 6.5 kW
The apex locators were set-up to detect this value
Accurate when dry, but significantly affected by
exudate, pulp tissue, haemorrage or elctrolytes
Sometimes resulted in a small electric shock to the
pt!
Second generation apex locators
Impedance-based apex locators
Theoretically more accurate than the solely resistive devices
However, still affected by the presence of electrolytes
and tended to be highly variable between teeth
Not accurate enough for reliable clinical use
Third generation apex locators
Use multiple frequencies to determine distance
between an endodontic instrument and the end of a canal
Usually calibrated to detect the apical constriction (but if apical constriction is abnormal this can result in misreadings)
Are often IMPROVED in accuracy by the presence of
electrolytes (eg NaOCl) and accuracy is decreased if the
canal is dry
Have an accuracy of 83-100%
Can be attached to rotary instuments to give instant
readings, but this may decrease accuracy
Fourth generation apex locators
Uses two frequencies to detect the apical constriction, but only uses one at a time
This apparently reduces ‘noise’ from using multiple
frequencies and therefore negates the need for a filter
The manufacturers claim fourth generation apex
locators are therefore more accurate
However, studies have failed to show improved
accuracy, with third and fourth generation apex
locators both proving to be equally as reliable
Problems with apex locators
Metallic restorations will short-circuit the apex locator resulting in a mis-reading
Perforations will trigger an apex response when the file touches the perforation
Large lateral canals may cause a mis-reading
Problems with apex locators: metallic restorations
Ideally replace metallic
restorations prior to treatment
If this is not possible, ensure the file does not touch the restoration and that the pulp chamber is not flooded with irrigating solution
Large lateral canals MAY cause a mis-reading
Problems with apex locators: perforations
This prevents an accurate apex locator reading from a perforated canal until the perforation has been repaired
This effect can be advantageous – if you are unsure if a perforation has occurred an apex locator will help confirm this
Problems with apex locators: lateral canals
Large lateral canals MAY cause a mis-reading
This should be relatively easy to detect as the apex locator will give an apex reading too soon
Tips for clinical success
- Radiographs
- The access cavity
- The irrigating media
- The endodontic file
- The apex (or 0) reading
- Re-checking the WL
- The battery
- Unstable readings
Radiographs
A pre-operative radiograph is essential to obtain information about the root canal’s shape and anatomy
Using an apex locator does not replace the need for a pre-operative radiograph
The access cavity
Ideally remove any metallic restorations prior to
treatment
No fluid in the pulp chamber – gentle drying with 3 in 1 syringe
Modern apex locators work best with a ‘moist’ canal – use paper points but not until the canal is completely dry
Irrigating media
The different irrigating solutions do not impact
significantly on the performance of modern apex locators
Just make sure the previous rules are followed, ie not flooded into the chamber and moist canal
The apex (or 0) reading
Advance the file until the visual display reads ‘apex’ or ‘0’
The apex locator is most accurate when it is giving an
‘apex’ or ‘0’ reading and contacting the PDL
Earlier readings (such as ‘0.5’ or ‘1’) do not indicate the distance in mm from the apex
Therefore, the best approach is to advance the file until it gives an ‘apex’ or ‘0’ reading, then manually
subtract 0.5mm from the length
This will ensure the file is within the root canal, but
still close to the PDL
Re-checking the WL
The WL should be re-checked with the apex locator after the coronal 2/3 of the canal have been shaped
The working length will decrease from the initial
reading due to a decrease in the curvature of the canal
This must be checked prior to shaping the apical
terminus
The battery
Low voltages cause electronic errors
Therefore, ensure the apex locator’s batteries are well charged before use
Unstable readings
Apex readings should only be accepted when the scale bar is:
Stable
Moves in sympathy with the movements of the file
If the visual scale bar does the following things, the apex reading
should not be accepted:
Flashes intermittently
Moves erratically
Displays no bars
Unstable readings can be due to a number of reasons, including a faulty
machine, obliterated anatomy, excessive exudate etc
If this occurs either use other methods of determining WL or dress the
canal and re-check on a subsequent visit
Locating the apex
Careful study of high quality radiographs.
Magnification of radiographs and blocking out of extraneous light.
Keeping apical anatomy foremost in your mind.
Use tactile sense to locate apical constriction.
Observe blood/fluids on instrument tip or anywhere on a paper point.
Use and understand your apex locator