Electron Microscopy 2 Flashcards
How small can the protein be for EM?
Generally, the minimum size of the protein must be >150kDa (150kDa is pretty small for EM).
How much sample is required for EM?
Does not require much sample (unlike XC) - roughly 2.5ul of material at 0.01-1mg/ml
Why is EM good for visualising MPs?
Can visualise the protein in its native environment.
What is needed to study large multi-protein complexes?
Lots of homogenous material - both compositional and conformational homogeneity.
Which methods be used to test for compositional homogeneity?
SDS PAGE
Size exclusion chromatography (SEC)
SEC coupled to multi angle light scattering (MALS).
What is key to achieving compositional homogeneity?
Purity.
What must you balance in sample preparation?
Achieving good signal to noise ratio with preservation of native structure of protein.
What is the major difference between light microscopy and EM?
Light microscopy works in air - EM works in a vacuum.
What is the issue of using a vacuum?
Biological molecules do not like to be contained in a vacuum so must be prepared to withstand it.
When was negative stain developed and what was it for at the time?
In 1959 - developed to study viruses.
What is negative stain made of?
Made of heavy metal salts such as uranium, molybdenum and tungsten. q
What are the steps involved in setting up a negative stain?
Bind the protein to a carbon support and then the heavy metal stain is added which forms a cast around the protein.
What is the benefit of the negative stain in a vacuum?
The protein remains hydrated while in the vacuum.
What are you in fact imaging in negative stain EM?
Actually imaging the heavy metal cast.
How does the negative stain protect the protein?
The metals are radiation hard - are not fired by radiation of inelastically scattered electrons.
Why is this radiation protection beneficial to EM?
Can increase electron dosage without damaging the protein.
How does the negative stain produce a better signal to noise ratio?
They interact with (scatter) electrons very well (better than biological molecules).