Electoral Systems AMS Flashcards

1
Q

INTRO

A

Additional Member System (AMS) is a voting system used to elect MSPs to the Scottish Parliament. AMS combine both FPTP to elect constituency MSs and Proportional Representation to elect Regional MSPs. The system gives you two votes, the first for the 73 constituency MSPs, the second to elect 7 MSPs in each of the eight regions in Scotland.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

1P

A

It can be argued that AMS is a more representative voting system as it provides broader representation as the electorate have two votes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

1E

A

This means they can chose a mixture of parties and it gives smaller parties a chance to win seats in elections.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

1E

A

For example the Greens gained a seat in Glasgow because of these two votes, whereas otherwise in other systems they would not have a seat there.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

1A

A

This shows that the system has the ability to promote smaller parties and allow theme to compete. It is clear that the system is more representative as it means that people who vote for minor parties votes still count.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

1R

A

However, many argue that the system is too complicated, confusing Scottish voters.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

1E

A

This means that because of the two votes, lots of people make mistakes when filling out the ballot.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

1E

A

For example, it was found that in 2007 there were a massive 142,000 rejected ballots in the Scottish election.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

1A

A

This demonstrates that the voting system can lead to less accurate and credible elections as so many peoples votes do not count.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

1L

A

It is clear that the voting system can actually be less representative as so many people’s votes are not valid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2P

A

AMS can be seen as beneficial because it often creates coalition governments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

2E

A

This means that the system creates a more representative government as it will be made up of parties from different ends of the political spectrum, meaning one party cannot force its opinions, as the two or more in charge must work together.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

2E

A

For example, the 1999 and 2003 elections created coalition governments that were crucial in passing many important laws in scotland, such as the smoking ban.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

2A

A

This shows that coalition governments in Scotland are able to succeed and work well together. It is clear that this system can aid in producing a government that is representative of a large group of Scottish voters.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

2R

A

On the other hand, many see coalition governments as a disadvantage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

2E

A

This is because no one actually votes for a coalition government on their ballot, meaning the government in power were not elected in that capacity, and so as a result are not representative.

16
Q

2E

A

For example, no one voted for the Labour - Liberal democrat coalition between 1999 and 2007, and the 2007-11 SNP minority government was unsuccessful in passing some of its key policies, such as the minimum pricing for alcohol.

17
Q

2A

A

This demonstrates that this system can produce governments that are unable to keep promises to the people that voted for them because of a lack of majority, and is therefore unrepresentative.

18
Q

2L

A

It is clear that AMS can actually produce an unrepresentative government.

19
Q

3P

A

Many argue for AMS because of the more proportional electoral results that system produces.

20
Q

3E

A

This means because it employs both proportional representation and First Past the Post, it is able to produce electoral results that more accurately reflect the number of people voting for each party.

21
Q

3E

A

For example, in 2011, the SP won 45.4% of the vote and this translated to 53.4% of the seats in parliament a far more proportional outcome than the 2015
General Election, which used FPTP, and gave UKIP just one seat, despite them winning nearly 13% of the vote.

22
Q

3A

A

It is clear from this that AMS is very successful in producing more representative election results. This demonstrates that the implementation of the system in scotland has lead to more representative results in voting in scottish elections, than in General elections.

23
Q

3R

A

Despite this, many argue that AMS actually gives smaller parties too much power.

24
Q

3E

A

This means that despite only a very small percentage of the population voting for them, they are given the power to make influential decisions by being involved in coalition governments.

25
Q

3E

A

For example, the Liberal Democrats were part of a coalition between 1999 and 2007, and helped pass free tuition and free care for the elderly despite only winning 15% of the vote.

26
Q

3A

A

This demonstrates that the system can produce governments that create laws that the vast majority of the population did not vote for.

27
Q

3L

A

It is clear that this system can be unsuccessful in producing governments that provide what the majority of people want, and as a result can be unrepresentative