Electoral Systems Flashcards

1
Q

Outline the characteristics of Elections in the UK

A
  • Universal adult suffrage
  • One person, one vote
  • Secret Ballot
  • Free, fair and regular - held every 5 years
  • Multiple levels: General elections, Devolved Assembly elections, European Parliament elections and Local elections (district, borough and city councils)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Functions of elections

A
  1. Form governments
  2. Ensure representation
  3. Uphold legitimacy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What doubts exist over the effectiveness of elections in ensuring representation?

A
  • Four/five year gaps between elections mean that governments rule unchallenged, even if a majority of the public oppose their rule
  • Doubt over the effectiveness of representatives in carrying out representation of their constituents, based on several models of representation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In what ways are governments not always legitimate?

A
  • Low levels of turnout bring into question whether Governments actually have a mandate to rule given to them by the majority of citizens. Recent General elections of 2001, 2005 and 2010 have all suffered from low turnout
  • Falling levels of support for major parties, Conservatives and Labour, may show disillusionment with Government as it is highly likely that one of these parties will win power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is representation?

A

When an individual or group stands on behalf of a larger body of people. Representation seeks to form a system of popular self-government in which there is no difference between the people and government, unlike democracy where this difference exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What 3 ways is representation supposedly carried out?

A
  • Trusteeship
  • Doctrine of the mandate
  • Descriptive representation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is trusteeship?

A
  • System of representation said to operate in the UK
  • MPs should not act as delegates but as trustees; this describes the way in which MPs act on behalf of others, using their superior knowledge and experience and better education, taking issues that are in that are in the long-term interests of their constituents to Parliament, even if these contradict their short-term interests/goals
  • Often referred to as the ‘Burkean Model’ of representation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the issues associated with trusteeship?

A
  • -MPs can act selfishly. Career-minded MPs may act in a way which would set them up for promotion within their party and not for the general good of their constituents
  • Out of date; it would mean MPs would have to assume knowledge of and responsibility for a much wider range of issues affecting a wider range of people, which is often outside of their existing knowledge or expertise
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the Doctrine of the Mandate?

A
  • Theory which argues that as parties publish manifestos during election campaigns, the winning party has the legitimacy to translate those commitments into laws or policies
  • Argues that parties act as representatives and not individual MPs, as the party’s policies have received the backing of the electorate and therefore represents their views
  • Also means that MPs should be loyal to their party, as if they do not, they are effecting the quality of representation given
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the criticisms of the Doctrine of the Mandate?

A
  • Assumes voters vote ‘rationally’ i.e. that they choose a party based on their manifesto. We know that often this does not happen, with a variety of ‘non-rational’ factors affecting their choices i.e. party name, background and age
  • It is unlikely voters agree entirely with a party’s manifesto
  • Parties do not have to honour their manifesto promises, meaning parties use ‘vote-winning’ policies to gain favour
  • Unclear whether the party or the PM claims the mandate
  • Cannot apply upon the formation of a coalition; certain manifesto promises have to be abandoned, such as the Lib Dems’ promise of an end to university tuition fees in 2010.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Descriptive Representation?

A
  • Parties should resemble the group they claim to represent
  • If this took place, government would be a cross-section of wider society, containing members from all races, classes and social groups
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a key problem with Descriptive Representation?

A

There are concerns whether the UK public are represented descriptively, as there is considerable under-representation of women and minorities in government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the concerns over the value of Descriptive Representation?

A
  • If a government only represents the groups from which they come, representation would become narrow with no insight into broader public interest and other points of view
  • If the government was fully representative of the population it would display its weaknesses i.e. apathy, lack of education and ill-informedness, and would not further public interests
  • Balancing out representation of different groups is difficult. For example, if one group was more highly represented than another, other groups could be said to be neglected. For example, Labour’s attempt to boost female representation in Parliament through all-women shortlists was declared illegal under equal-oppurtunities legislation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a majoritarian electoral system?

A
  • An electoral system which promotes the likelihood of single-party majority government
  • Larger parties tend to win a higher proportion of seats than the proportion of votes they gain at election
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the subdivisions which exist within majoritarian electoral systems? What is a problem with majoritarian systems?

A
  • Plurality Systems: where individual candidates only need to win a majority of the vote e.g. FPTP
  • Majority Systems: where candidates need to win a majority of the vote (over 50%) e.g the Alternative Vote and SV

-Both are highly disproportionate; there is little correlation between the % of votes and the % of seats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are proportional systems?

A

-An electoral system which guarantees an equal, or at least a closer and more reliable link between the number of seats gained by parties and the number of votes they gain at election

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Where is First-Past-the-Post used?

A

Westminster General elections and English and Welsh local government elections

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Outline the workings of FPTP

A
  • Constituency-based system: there are 646 constituencies in the UK
    1. Voters select a single candidate by marking an ‘X’ next to their name on the ballot paper, reflecting the “one person = one vote” principle
    2. Constituencies are of roughly equal size. This is ensured by the Electoral Commission in England and Wales and the Boundary Commission in Scotland and Northern Ireland
    3. Each constituency returns a single candidate as winner. However in local government there are multi-member constituencies
  • The winning candidate must only have achieved a plurality of the votes i.e. more than any other candidate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the implications of First-Past-the-Post?

A
  • Disproportionality
  • Systematic Biases
  • Two-Party system
  • Single-party majority government
  • The landslide effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Describe how FPTP creates disproportionality

A
  • Fails to create a link between the % of votes gained by a party and the number of seats they win
  • This is because the system elects individual members, not parties as a whole
  • For example, it is possible for the ‘wrong’ party to win at election; in 1951, Conservatives formed a majority government with fewer votes than Labour. The opposite happened again in 1974.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Describe the first systematic bias which comes about as a result of FPTP

A
  • Size of party - larger parties benefit at the expense of smaller ones;
  • 100% of the representation is gained by a single candidate/party in each constituency
  • Winning candidates normally come from larger parties as they are more likely to win a plurality of support (due to funding, notoriety)
  • Voters are unlikely to vote for smaller parties as they feel their vote will be wasted.
22
Q

Describe the second systematic bias which comes about as a result of FPTP

A
  • Distribution of party support:
  • Parties who secure ‘geographically concentrated’ support, that is to say large amounts of votes in a single area, have more effective support
  • This means they are most likely to win pluralities of the votes and gain seats
  • The ability to do this is determined by party size and their ability to gain support; both Conservatives and Labour have been ‘over-represented’ by FPTP because they are large parties with considerable notoriety and funding which attract a particular ‘class’ of person
  • The Lib Dems suffer doubly; they are a smaller party with less concentrated and less class-based support. This creates even distribution of support meaning it is hard for them to gain pluralities of the vote
23
Q

Describe the Two-Party System created by FPTP

A
  • Politics tends to be dominated by two parties
  • This is because only two parties have sufficient support to gain a plurality of the vote
  • Since the 1950s UK politics has been dominated by both Conservatives and Labour; in the 1950’s they gained over 95% of the vote, whilst in 2010 they gained only 65% - however, in 2010 85% of MPs in the Commons were either Conservative or Labour MPs
24
Q

What are the implications of a Two-Party system?

A
  • Voters likely to support 3rd parties such as the Lib Dems or Plaid Cymru/the SNP will be discouraged from voting for these parties as they feel their vote will be wasted
  • “Safe seats” occur when it is extremely unlikely any other party will win candidacy in a constituency. For example, South Cambs could be said to be a Conservative “safe seat”
  • Due to safe seats, the outcome of General Elections is determined by voting patterns in areas which are said to be “Marginal seats”
25
Q

What is Single-Party government?

A
  • One of the most significant implications of FPTP is that one of the two main parties usually has enough support to govern alone
  • Offers strong and stable government
  • Coalitions very unlikely
  • The other major party who did not win governmental support becomes the ‘opposition’, acting like a government “in waiting” with ministers shadowing those of the ruling executive
  • Coalitions are very unlikely (Feb 1974 and 2010), but Single-Party government remains one of the key arguments against electoral reform and remaining with the Westminster electoral system
26
Q

What is the Landslide Effect?

A
  • Takes place when small shifts in votes can produce dramatic change when it comes to gaining seats
  • This allows parties to win ‘landslide victories’ with very little support
  • Describes a rapid decline in support for the second major party, causing rapid increases in support for the largest party
  • E.g In 1983, Conservatives won a 143-seat majority, (up from only 44 seats at the previous election) despite the fact that Conservative support fell by 0.5%
27
Q

Which 4 Proportional Systems are currently used in the UK?

A
  • Additional Member system (AMS)
  • Single Transferable Vote system (STV)
  • Regional Party List
  • Supplementary Vote/Alternative Vote system
28
Q

Where is the Additional Member system used?

A

Scottish Parliamentary elections, Welsh and Greater London Assemblies

29
Q

What are the features of the Additional Member System?

A
  • Mixed system: made up of both constituency and party lists
  • A certain proportion of seats are filled with FPTP using Single-member constituencies. In Scotland and London, 56% of representatives are elected this way
  • Remaining seats are filled using the ‘closed’ party list
  • Voters cast two different votes: one for a candidate in a constituency election and one for a party in a list election
  • The party list votes are used to ‘top-up’ the constituency results. This is done ‘correctively’ using the Belgian D’Hondt model, so that the outcome is proportional
30
Q

What are the advantages of AMS?

A
  • Balanced system; balances the need for constituency representation against the need for electoral fairness
  • Single-party majority governments are still extremely likely
  • Wider and more meaningful choice for voters. For example, they can vote for different parties in the constituency list elections, allowing them to show their views accurately
31
Q

What are the disadvantages of AMS?

A
  • The fact that single-member constituencies aren’t proportional reduces the likelihood of wider proportionality
  • Confusing; there are two classes of representative. May alienate less politically- educated citizens
  • Representation is less effective than in FPTP; constituencies are larger and many MPs have no constituency duties
32
Q

Where is the Single -Transferable Vote (STV) system used?

A

Northern Ireland Assembly, in Northern Ireland and Scotland for local elections and in Northern Ireland for European Parliament elections

33
Q

What are the features of the Single - Transferable Vote system?

A
  • Multimember constituencies e.g in N.I there are 18 constituencies returning 6 members each
  • Political Parties are allowed to put forward as many candidates as there are seats to fill a constituency
  • Voters vote preferentially, ranking candidates in order (1,2,3,4 etc.)
  • Candidates are elected if they achieve a quota of votes; this quota is calculated using the Droop formula (number of votes cast divided by (number of seats available +1) )
  • Votes are then counted firstly according to first preferences
  • If any candidate then achieves the quota, all votes for him/her which are not 1st preferences are added
  • If the seats are left unfilled, the candidate with the fewest votes drops out and his/her votes are then redistributed according to second or subsequent preferences
34
Q

What are the advantages of STV?

A
  • Highly proportional
  • Competition between candidates of the same party means they can be judged on their individual records and personal strengths
  • Multi-member constituencies mean constituents can choose who to take their grievances to
35
Q

What are the disadvantages of STV?

A
  • Proportionality is variable according to the party system
  • Strong and stable single-party governments are unlikely
  • Coalitions are extremely likely
  • Multi-member constituencies may cause internal divisions in parties due to competition between MPs
36
Q

Where is the Regional Party List system used?

A

European Parliament

37
Q

What are the features of the Regional Party List?

A
  • Large number of multi-member constituencies. For the European Parliament, the UK is divided into 12 regions, each returning 3-10 members
  • Political parties compile a list of candidates standing for election, in descending order of preference
  • Voters vote for parties not candidates; who wins is decided internally in a ‘closed’ party list system
  • Parties are allocated seats in direct proportion to the votes they gain in each regional constituency. They then fill the seats internally using the list.
38
Q

What are the advantages of the Party List system?

A
  • ‘Pure’ proportional representation which is fair to all parties
  • Promotes unity by encouraging voters to identify with a region and not a constituency
  • Easier for women and minorities to be elected, provided their party features them on the list
39
Q

What are the disadvantages of the Party List system?

A
  • Many small parties in government make it weak and unstable
  • MP-Constituency link is weakened and may be broken alltogether
  • Parties enjoy increased power as they decide on candidates to put forward; difficult for parties to act un-biasedly when choosing who appears on the list
40
Q

Where is the Supplementary/Alternative vote system used?

A

London Mayoral elections and Scottish local by-elections

41
Q

What are the features of AV?

A
  • Single-member constituencies
  • Voters vote preferentially
  • Votes are counted in order of preference. If no candidate wins over 50% of the vote the bottom candidate drops out, and so on until one candidate wins 50%
42
Q

What are the features of SV?

A
  • Single-member constituencies
  • Voters have two votes: a first preference and a second ‘supplementary’ vote
  • Votes are counted in order of preference
  • The top 2 candidates remain in election and all others drop out, with their votes being redistributed on the basis of votes gained from the ‘supplementary vote’
43
Q

What are the advantages of SV/AV?

A
  • Fewer votes are ‘wasted’ thanks to redistribution
  • A broader range of views and opinions influence the outcome of the election as candidates must win over 50% of the vote
  • The winning candidate must have broad support
44
Q

What are the disadvantages of SV/AV?

A
  • The outcome may be determined by the preferences of extremist/smaller parties who do not represent the wider population
  • Winning candidates may enjoy little first-preference support and only succeed with the help of redistributed supplementary votes
45
Q

What are the implications of Proportional Sytems?

A
  1. Greater Proportionality
  2. Multiparty systems
  3. Coalition or minority government
  4. Concensus-building
46
Q

Give an example of the benefits of proportionality given by Proportional Systems

A

-In 2007, in the Scottish-Parliament elections, although Labour won just over 50% of the seats with only 32% of the vote, its overall representation was corrected by the distribution of party-list seats. This in the end gave them a proportional 36% of the seats

47
Q

Describe the implication of multiparty systems

A
  • The parties who are denied almost any form of representation under FPTP are given representation by Proportional Systems
  • This broadens the basis of party representation and creates multiparty systems.
48
Q

Multiparty systems - the Green Party: Outline this example

A
  • Until 2010, when it had a single seat, the Greens did not have any representation in Westminster, despite having gained over a quarter of a million votes in some previous general elections
  • However, in institutions using proportional systems, such as the Greater London Assembly and Scottish/European Parliaments, Greens are represented with two members in each
49
Q

Coalition governments - example

A

-Apart from the majority won by the SNP in 2011, all Scottish Parliament administrations have been Labour - Liberal Democrat coalitions or a minority SNP executive (as seen in 2007)

50
Q

Define what is meant by ‘Concensus - building’.

How is concensus building carried out formally?

A
  • Coalition governments necessitate the inclusion of different policies and a different method of policy-making
  • These include compromise, negotiation and the development of a cross-party concensus
  • This is done formally through the creation of coalition governments through coalition agreements themselves;
  • These are post-election deals on the distribution of posts in government and how legislation will include the policies of all parties in the coalition