Elections and Referendums (UK) Flashcards
What are the functions of UK elections?
Selecting representatives
Selecting political leaders
Selecting a government
Participation
Influencing policy by prompting the development of manifestos
Holding government and representatives accountable
Voter education
Legitimising the government by providing a mandate
What are the types of UK elections?
General Election
Devolved assembly elections
Local elections
PCC elections
By-Elections.
What is a majoritarian electoral system?
Electoral systems in which the candidates with the highest number of votes in each constituency is elected.
FPTP is classed a majoritarian system - winning candidate however only requires a plurality rather than a majority.
What is a proportional electoral system?
Used to describe a range of systems that produce a close fit between the proportion of votes and seats won.
Proportional systems use multi-member constituencies and electoral formulas to allocate the seats within them to parties (STV).
How does the FPTP system work?
650 constituencies - each with roughly 70,000 people. (constituency boundaries are decided by an independent boundary commission).
Seeing winner is simple, candidate with the most votes wins, no need for a majority.
Winning party is the party with the most seats - to form a government a party must win a majority of seats.
2019: conservatives won 57% of the vote share and 368 seats.
Hung parliaments happen rarely ( 2010 and 2017).
What are the strengths of FPTP?
-Simple to understand.
-Direct link between voters and individual MP.
-Simple plurality system provides a winners bonus - provides a strong stable majoritarian government.
-Rarely produces minority governments.
-Extremist parties are kept out of parliament.
What are the weaknesses of FPTP?
-Simple plurality systems means that MPs lack a majority and have a questionable mandate.
-Produces disproportionate outcomes, 2015 UKIP won 3.8 million votes, but only got one seat.
-Millions of votes wasted 70.8% of votes in the 2019 election were cast for loosing candidates and winning candidates who had already achieved a plurality.
-Safe seats means votes are wasted.
-Many voters feel forced to resort to tactical voting.
-Did not produce a strong stable government in 2010 and 2017.
Argument that the FPTP system does meet the Jenkins commission criteria:
-It establishes a direct link between an MP and their constituency.
-It produces a stable government.
Argument that the FPTP system does not meet the Jenkins Commission:
-It doesn’t give voters a wide choice, tactical voting.
-It doesn’t deliver a broadly proportional result.
Where is STV used?
Used for the Northern Ireland assembly and local elections in Scotland.
How does STV work?
-There are large multi-member constituencies.
-Voters number the candidates in order of preferences.
-Parties have multiple candidates in order to gain seats.
-Voters can pick candidates from different parties.
-Candidates have to reach a quota of votes.
-First preferences are counted and those who achieve or exceed the quota are elected.
-Surplus votes from the winning candidates redistributed.
-If seats still available, then those at the bottom are eliminated - their votes are redistributed until the seats are filled.
What are the strengths of STV?
-Produces a broadly proportional result.
- Voters have a much greater choice - they can select multiple parties and priorities candidates.
-Fewer wasted votes, surplus votes are redistributed.
-Smaller parties have a much greater chance of winning.
-Eliminates the problem of safe seats and the need for tactical voting.
What are the weaknesses of STV?
-Takes a long Time for votes to be counted and winners announced.
-Voting is confusing.
-Alphabet voting - those higher on the paper more likely to be picked.
-Exisiting constituency boundaries would have to be redrawn and enlarged to create, large multi-member constituencies.
-Proportional results means coalitions are more likely.
Argument that STV does meet the Jenkins commission criteria:
it gives a proportional result.
It gives voters greater choice.
Argument that STV does not meet the Jenkins Commission criteria:
It doesn’t produce a stable government.
Doesn’t maintain the link between a single MP and a constituency.
Where is the AMS system used?
Scottish parliament., the Welsh assembly and the greater London assembly.
How does AMS work?
Under AMS voters cast two votes, one constituency vote for a local candidate and one regional vote for a party to be allocated proportional.
Some representatives are elected using FPTP in single-member constituencies.
-‘Additional members’ are elected in multi-member consistencies using the proportional regional list system.
-The d’Hondt formula is used to allocate seats.
-the greater number of regional lists, the more proportional the final result.
Scottish parliament elections, 73 seats are determined using FPTP in single meters constituencies.
56 seats are allocated using the regional party list system.
What are strengths of AMS?
-Combines best features of FPTP and proportional systems - produces a proportional result, whilst maintain a consistency link.
-Fewer wasted votes, the regional vote counts.
-Voters have a greater choice, voters can select a minority party for the regional vote without fearing it will be wasted.
-Regional party list can be used to improve representation of minorities - alternating male and female candidates on the party lists.
What are the weaknesses of AMS?
-System creates two classes of MP- some acceptable to the electorate and others to party leaders. ( this has led to tension in MSPs).
-party leaders become extremely influential because they determine the composition and order of the party lists.
-Small parties still under-represented.
-More complicated than FPTP - increases the risk of incorrectly completed ballot papers.
Argument that the AMS system does meet the Jenkins Commission criteria?
-Give broadly proportional results.
-Gives voters greater choice.
-maintains a link between a single MP and a constituency.
Argument that AMS does not meet the Jenkins commission criteria?
It does not produce a stable government.
What constitutional reform did Labour promise in their 1997 manifesto?
-AMS was introduced for the Scottish Parliament Welsh Assembly.
-STV was introduced for the Northern Ireland Assembly.
-STV was introduced for Mayor of London and PCC’s.
-A pledge to identify a proportional alternative for FPTP for general elections.
What are the advantages of electoral reform?
-Greater third party successes - proportional systems have meant that support for third parties has transferred to seats. UKIP won the 2014 European parliaments elections, SNP has won successive Scottish parliament elections.
-Greater choice - AMS gives voters greater choice, STV allows voters to rank candidates from multiple parties. Split tickets.
-Fewer Wasted Votes- redistribution of votes in STV and AMS is proportional.
What are the disadvantages of electoral reform brought to the UK?
Minority and coalition govs - critics argue that this leads to unstable governments.
Has not increased turnout - 2021 turnout in Scottish parliament elections is 63.5%.
More rejected ballots - more ballots rejected because they are completed incorrectly - 0.2% rejected under FPTP and 1% under AMS.