Elections And Referendums Flashcards
1
Q
What are some of the main factors we can analyse when evaluating electoral systems?
A
- proportionality/fair result - proportion of seats should correspond to overall % of vote.
- vote value - all equally important in determining final outcome of election; none wasted.
- promoting participation/turnout
- strong/accountable gov - ppl should feel that gov can deliver promises, but can also reward/punish PM/party.
- local links - MPs represent specific regions; voters can brung grievances/concerns directly.
- power of the party - different candidates from same party to prevent too much power being given too central party bureaucracy/leadership.
- party choice/representation - should encourage/enable broad range of parties to stand.
- comprehensibility/transparency - easy to understand/produce clear results.
2
Q
Why is there debate over electoral reform?
A
- 2015 - cross-party pressure group Make Votes Matter formed; campaigned for proportional, not majoritarian electoral system for UK GEs.
- parties such as Green, Lib Dem, Brexit handicapped by FPTP.
- proportional systems almost inevitably lead to coalitions; PR unpopular with main parties.
- have potential impacts on voting behaviour; many voters reluctant to choose candidate they feel stands ni chance of winning/vote tactically; may not vote/abstain.
*eg in European elections (used proportional system since 1999) Eurosceptic parties (UKIP/Brexit) fared much better than in GEs.
3
Q
What is FPTP?
A
- simple plurality system where candidate with most votes elected/does not have to win by a certain majority.
- used in UK GEs;voters cast one vote for preferred candidate, and candidate with largest number of votes in a constituency will be elected to Parliament as an MP.
4
Q
Advantages of FPTP?
A
- often leads to strong gov with clear mandate to carry out its policies because the winning party can win a clear majority; 1979-2010: main parties able to dominate gov for lengthy periods.
- gives voters clear choice/promotes a system where two parties dominate.
- provides strong representation in the UK with small constituencies having a single MP to represent their interests; MPs hold surgeries to listen to their needs and offer advice;
average constituency size in England is 72,000. - simple/easy for voters to understand;voters choose one candidate with a single vote, and the winning party is the one with the most seats.
- turnout not in steady decline; 65.1% in 2010, 67.3% in 2019.
5
Q
Disadvantages of FPTP?
A
- number of seats won does not directly reflect proportion of votes cast; eg in 2019, Tories won 77 more seats than vote share entitled them to; third parties underrepresented eg Green won 2.7% of vote, but only won 0.2% of seats (1).
- exaggerates performance of winning party; 1997 - Labour won 63% of seats with 43% of vote; 1983 - Tories won 61% of seats with 42% of vote.
- many votes wasted; 2019 - Brexit party won 644,257 votes but no MPs; biased towards main parties/regional parties.
- does not allow voters to choose between candidates from same party.
6
Q
What is party list proportional representation?
A
- more than one person elected per constituency in bigger areas.
- parties rank candidates in each area.
- used in UK (except NI) for European elections; country divided into 11 large regions, each electing 3-10 MEPs.
- MEPs elected on basis of vote share.
- D’Hondt system used - allocates seats in successive rounds w/one allocated in each.
*total votes for each party/number of seats party has already won + 1. - party with highest remaining total wins seat in that round.
7
Q
Advantages of List PR?
A
- number of seats won closely reflects actual vote share; eg in 2019 SE England results - Brexit Party won around 39% of overall vote, gaining 40% of seats.
- less chance of votes being wasted; wider range of parties can be expected to win seats.
- an open list system allows voters to choose between candidates of same party on regional list.
- wider range of candidates elected; eg in 2009 - two BNP candidates elected as MEPs.
8
Q
Disadvantages of List PR?
A
- less straightforward/more cumbersome with multiple rounds.
- closed-list system gives considerable power to central party.
- often produces results where no one party secures majority of seats; 2019 - winning party (Brexit) won just 29/73 seats; more coalition govs almost inevitable -> harder to punish/reward individual parties in gov; post-election deals/compromises.
- weaker local links due to larger constituencies; may also remove notion of an MP serving all constituents.
- turnout of European elections low compared to GEs; 36.9% in 2019.
9
Q
What is AMS?
A
- hybrid system; mixture of FPTP/List PR.
- used for electing members of Scottish/Welsh parliaments and London Assembly.
- voters have two ballot papers/two votes; first is list of candidates for constituency representative, second is list of parties for region.
*eg: in Scotland - 73 MSPs selected from first, 56 from second. - regional list representatives top up any under representation from constituency results.
10
Q
Advantages of AMS?
A
- ensures a strong link between the MP elected by the FPTP vote and their constituents who directly vote for them.
- has a proportional element to it through proportionally assigning seats to parties from the lists based on the number of votes for each party.
- gives voters more choice because they can use one vote for an MP they support and another to support a party of their choosing.
*Voters can vote for a ‘split ticket’ where they support an MP from one party and use their party list vote to support a different party.
11
Q
Disadvantages of AMS?
A
- Smaller parties are less well represented under AMS than in an entirely proportional system because the party list system can advantage the largest parties.
*In Wales, there are a small number of top-up seats, which favours the Labour Party. - Party list candidates have less legitimacy than members elected by the FPTP vote because they aren’t directly elected with a personal mandate from voters.
- AMS lacks democratic transparency because the party decides who is on the party list and ranks the order of candidates.
12
Q
What is STV?
A
- works on basis of multi-member constituencies, where voters rank candidates in order of preference.
- quota worked out based on number of seats and total number of votes cast; candidate w/more first preference votes than quota immediately elected.
- surplus votes transferred to other candidates un proportion to second preference marked on ballots.
- currently used for European elections in NI and Scottish local council elections.
13
Q
Advantages of STV?
A
- proportional system; tends to deliver results that accurately reflect overall shares of vote; tends to be one most preferred by advocates of a more proportional system, such as the Electoral Reform Society.
- preferential voting reduces potential for wasted votes.
- turnout in NI in 2019 European elections was higher than rest of UK with 45%.
- all elected members represent geographical area; ppl can approach range of representatives.
14
Q
Disadvantages of STV?
A
- almost inevitably produces coalition/multiparty gov; leads to coalition deals/policy compromises.
- each representative oversees large areas.
- not that straightforward and can be a lengthy process; in Ireland it can take around two full days.
15
Q
What is AV?
A
- voter ranks each candidate.
- maintains single member constituencies.
- no quota
- candidate that receives more than half of votes elected; can include second preference etc until they do.
- only used for election of chairs to select committees.