EIP Flashcards

1
Q

Strategies for finding RCTs

A

1) look for limiters/filters targeting RCTs
2) field searching (targets publication type/RCTs)
3) RCT-related keywords
4) determine if database has special focus on RCTs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Finding RCTs in PubMed

A

1) Randomized Controlled Trial filter (under “customize”)
2) Advanced search -publication type = RCT
3) Clinical Queries- Therapy (category) & Narrow (scope)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

finding RCTs in medline & CINAHL

A

RCT limiter under publication type on the limit your results page

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

finding RCTs in TRIP database

A

controlled trials filter in the refine results by evidence type menu on right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

finding RCTs in SportDiscus & AMED

A

these databases do not have a specific limiter/filter for RTCs.
-need to add RTC-related keywords
(try randomized OR randomised OR random*)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

finding RCTs in PEDro

A

PEDro has a special focus on RCTs and groups RCTs together in your search results automatically.

  • look for results labeled clinical trial in method column.
  • PEDro pre-appraises RCTs for quality; the quality score shows up in score column
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

5 Steps to EBP

A

1) Ask
2) Access
3) Appraise (quality)
4) Apply
5) Assess (effect & self assessment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

background Q’s

A
  • general questions

- multiple tangents depending on different patient & dr perspectives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

foreground Q’s

A
  • clinical Q’s that will give you a better chance at finding the best available evidence
    1) Therapy -will modality help?
    2) Harm -will there be adverse effects?
    3) Prognosis -what’s the observed outcome?
    4) Diagnosis - will a particular test help?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

creating foreground Q’s

A

P: population/problem
I: intervention
C: comparison (not always necessary)
O: outcome of interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

useful sources of pre-appraised literature

A

1) Dynamed
2) Turning research into practice (TRIP)
3) Physiotherapy evidence database (PeDro)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

levels of evidence

A

1) systemic review –> meta-analysis** OR qualitative
2) randomized control trial
3) cohort
4) case study/ report

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

best answer for a therapy Q is found?

A

RCTs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

best answer for a risk factor of rare condition is found?

A

case-control studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

best answer for a diagnostic Q is found

A

cross-sectional studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

best answer for a prognosis Q is found

A

cohort studies

17
Q

anecdots

A

he said, she said stories

  • pure observation
  • unpublished
18
Q

case reports/series

A
  • published studies of what happened to a single person or group of people
  • based on observation only
19
Q

cross-sectional studies

A

exposure & outcome are measured at the same time & once like a snapshot in time
-DIAGNOSIS-related Q’s

20
Q

Case-Control Studies

A

people w. disease & people w/o obtained info about past exposure that can be considered a risk for the disease
-HARM-related Q’s

21
Q

cohort studies

A

data is obtained via exposure of 2 groups (tx & control) over time.
–PROspectice = both groups followed forward in time NOT in the past

-RETROspective = both groups followed forward in time but starting at time in the past

22
Q

randomized control trial (RCT)

A

considered the primary study for foreground Q’s about therapy.
-meta-analysis & systematic reviews

23
Q

key components of a RCT =

A
  • subjects = treatment OR control group
  • allocation is done using ransom mechanism
  • baseline measurements are taken
  • intervention is applied in blinded fashion to treatment & control group
  • outcome measured by blind assessors in both groups over a pre-determined follow-up
24
Q

ABCDFIX =

A
A= allocation / administered
B= blinding
C= comparisons
D= drop outs/ lost data
F= follow up
I= intention to treat (only when there is lost data)
X= everything else
25
Look for ABCDFIX in...
``` A = methods section B= methods C= Table 1/figure 1 D= figure 1 F= figure 1 I= results X= everywhere! ```
26
are allocation and randomization the same thing?
NO
27
is blinding the same as concealed allocation?
NO
28
blinding most important players =
1) Dr. 2) Patient 3) Outcome assessor ** - look to see if they asked patient if they thought they knew which group they were in = if blinding actually worked or not
29
Subjective (-) Vs. Objective (*) measures
- pain rating * motion palpation - dizziness - length of time you can sit w/o pain * orthopedic tests * low back endurance timed - questionnaire regarding things you can no longer do at home * deep tendon reflexes - number of days missing work
30
Comparison
after randomization is one group at an advantage - comparable start - comparable extra help - comparable attention - comparable compliance
31
Drop Outs why should we care?
- subjects who dropout might be different than those that stay - loss of randomization - loss of statistical power
32
what we want to know about drop outs
- how many (5-20% rule) - how was loss distributed (evenly btw groups) - why was data lost? (adverse effects, got well?) - was it corrected for?
33
Follow up
was it complete/ long enough for the clinical outcome? SHORT TERM = 4-6 weeks? LONG TERM= heart 2-10years OR low back pain (6-12m)
34
intention to treat...
once randomized always analyzed | **must in RCT = addresses known & unknown prognosis factors
35
5 reasons to like intention to treat
1) preserves randomization 2) maintain prognosis balance 3) preserves sample size balance 4) helps prevent an overestimation of how good a treatment really is 5) intention-to-treat better reflects