Effectiveness Of Custodial And Non-custodial Responses To Crime Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Introduction

A
  • Crime within Scotland is a real and ongoing issue with just under 300,000 crimes in Scotland per year.
  • Criminals are punished in a variety of ways however come under two broad factors; Custodial sentences are when the criminals are sentenced and kept in custody.
  • Non-Custodial sentences are alternatives to Prison such as Community Payback Orders (CPO) and electronic tags.
  • There are many factors to take into consideration when judging which of the two are more effective such as Reoffending rates, Overcrowding in prisons, Costs and Crimes of the highest violence.
  • In this essay, it shall be contended that non-custodial crimes should replace all punishments to crime with the exception of crimes of the highest degree
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

high reoffending rates

A
  • It can be argued that custodial sentences have failed and should be replaced by non-custodial responses to crime.
  • This can be seen in terms of the high reoffending rates after [short term] custodial sentences.
  • Evidence of this is according to GOV.UK in July 2023, adults released from Custodial sentences of less than 12 months had a proven reoffending rate of 55.1%.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

high reoffending rates - Analysis

A
  • Arguably this shows that custodial sentences have failed because over half of adults released from Custodial sentences of less than a year go on to reoffend again which shows reoffending rates after custodial sentences are high.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Lower reoffending rates

A
  • In contrast, non-custodial responses to crime should replace custodial sentences as a result of lower reoffending rates.
  • This can be seen by the Scottish Government publishing evidence that community interventions are more effective than short prison sentences in reducing reoffending.
  • This is evident when the Scottish Government in June 2019 extended the presumption against short sentences from three to 12 months and helped ensure reoffending rates have since remained at a 20-year low.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Lower reoffending rates - Analysis

A
  • Arguably, this shows that non-custodial responses to crime should replace custodial sentences because as a result of the reoffending rate being at a two-decade low as a result of extending prison sentences.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Reoffending rates - Evaluation

A
  • In evaluation, it can be argued that custodial sentences have failed and should be replaced by non-custodial crime as reoffending rates are very high as 55.1% of custodial sentences of less than 12 months go on to reoffend.
  • Therefore, custodial sentences should be replaced by non-custodial responses as the extension of presumption against short sentences has proven a reduced reoffending rate.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Health and Safety

A
  • It can be argued that custodial sentences have failed and should be replaced by non-custodial responses to crime.
  • This can be seen in terms of health and safety as prisons are generally heavily overcrowded.
  • This is evident when the BBC highlighted in January 2019 that Brian Kinloch in Perth prison remained awaiting trial as he was one of the 662 prisoners when he went in, but the prison capacity was 630.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Health and Safety - analysis

A
  • This shows that custodial sentences have failed because prisoners’ human rights are being violated as they are in a place of care and their health and safety is put at risk due to large numbers of prisoners.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Health and Safety

A
  • In contrast, it can be argued that non-custodial responses to crime should replace custodial sentences.
  • This can be seen when key politicians highlight the latter as a clear solution to overcrowding.
  • This is evident in 2024 there is 60% overcrowding according to the Manchester metropolitan newspaper in England and Wales.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Health and Safety - analysis

A
  • This shows that non-custodial responses to crime should replace custodial sentences as this shows the population is too big for British prisons to hold which means the conditions in prison are not suitable for prisoners.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Health and Safety - evaluation

A
  • In evaluation, it could be argued that custodial sentences have failed and should be replaced by non-custodial sentences as prisons are generally overcrowded which can impact on the health and safety of prisoners which can be considered a violation of their human rights.
  • Therefore, non-custodial responses to crime should replace custodial sentences as the population of the UK is too big for prisons to hold people so prisons are not suitable for prisoners.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

cost

A
  • It can be argued that custodial responses to crime have failed and should be replaced by non-custodial responses to crime.
  • This is because the amount of money spent on housing prisoners is extremely high.
  • Evidence shows that from 2022- 23 the budget Scotland allocated was around £3 billion for criminal justice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

cost - analysis

A
  • Arguably, this shows that custodial sentences have failed because too much is being spent on keeping prisoners in prisons and not enough on other important issues.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

cost

A
  • In contrast, non-custodial responses to crime should replace custodial sentences as a result of it being potentially a more cost-effective alternative.
  • This can be seen by the increased use of community interventions such as the Community Payback Orders (CPO) being a more cost-effective alternative.
  • Evidence of this is the Ministry of Justice has costed CPOs at £1858 per individual per year which is a fraction of the cost of prison.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

cost - analysis

A
  • This shows that non-custodial responses to crime should replace custodial sentences because it is a much cheaper alternative to prison and is also seen to be very effective with more than half of terminations being successful.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

cost - evaluation

A
  • In evaluation, it could be argued that custodial responses to crime have failed and should be replaced by non-custodial responses to crime as the rate of spending is much higher for custodial sentences than non-custodial sentences.
  • This is seen by the contrasting figures as it costs over £37,000 to imprison an individual whilst it only costs £1800, to have someone serve a community payback order, therefore making it more economically viable.
17
Q

more serious crimes

A
  • It can be argued that custodial sentences do not always fail and therefore should not be fully replaced by non-custodial responses to crime.
  • This can be seen when considering the most serious crimes committed and that custodial sentences can be effective by depriving someone of their freedom and is therefore a good form of punishment and it is a form of justice that can help the victim to achieve closure if they feel that the prison is a fair punishment.
  • Evidence of this is the killers of Brianna Ghey, who are both aged 16 have been sentenced to life in prison due to the brutal and planned murder they carried out in February 2023.
18
Q

more serious crimes - analysis

A
  • Arguably this shows that custodial sentences have not failed and in fact are the best option because families of victims may be able to gain some form of justice from this incarceration as her killers received the minimum sentence of 22 and 20 years respectively which the mother of Brianna Ghey welcomed in relation to her daughter’s death.
19
Q

more serious crimes

A
  • In contrast, non-custodial responses to crime should not always replace custodial sentences as response to crime.
  • This can be seen when considering non-custodial responses such as Home Detention Curfew which are not always successful.
  • This is evident in the case of James Wright who had been put on HDC after having been found carrying a knife but went on to murder a father of 3 in Paisley in June 2018 after breaking his tag 6 months before.
20
Q

more serious crimes - analysis

A
  • This shows that non-custodial responses to crime should not always replace custodial sentences as response to crime because they don’t always work and that custodial sentences are a valuable response to certain crimes; particularly when it comes to James Wright’s case where the non-custodial response failed.
21
Q

More serious crime evaluation

A
  • In evaluation, it could be argued that custodial sentences do not always fail and therefore should not fully be replaced by noncustodial responses to crime as sometimes perpetrators being sentenced to prison can bring some type of justice to the victim and their family such as in the case of Brianna Ghey as her killers were sentenced to a minimum sentence of 20 and 22 years.
  • Furthermore, non-custodial sentences should not always replace custodial sentences as a response to crime as they do not always work such as in the case of James Wright where the non-custodial response failed.
22
Q

Conclusion

A
  • In conclusion, it can be argued that custodial sentences have failed and should be replaced by non-custodial responses to crime as over half of adults released from Custodial sentences of less than 12 months reoffend which shows reoffending rates after custodial sentences are high.
  • Therefore, non-custodial sentences responses to crime should replace custodial sentences as reoffending rates remain at a 20 year low as a result of prison sentences being extended.
  • Furthermore, it can be argued that custodial sentences have failed and should be replaced by non-custodial responses to crime as it could be argued that custodial sentences have failed and should be replaced by non-custodial sentences as prisons are overcrowded which can harm prisoners’ health and safety which can be considered an infringement on their human rights.
  • Therefore, non-custodial responses to crime should replace custodial sentences as the population of the UK is too big for prisons to hold people so prisons are not suitable for prisoners.
  • Moreover, it could be argued that custodial responses to crime have failed and should be replaced by non-custodial responses to crime as amount spent on custodial sentences is significantly more than non-custodial sentences.
  • Finally, it could be argued that custodial sentences do not always fail and therefore should not fully be replaced by noncustodial responses to crime as sometimes perpetrators being sentenced to prison can bring some type of justice to the victim and their family such as in the case of Brianna Ghey.
  • Furthermore, non-custodial sentences should not always replace custodial sentences as a response to crime as they do not always work such as in the case of James Wright where the non-custodial response failed.
  • Overall, it can be argued that custodial sentences have failed and should be replaced by non-custodial responses to crime.