Educational policy Flashcards
What is educational policy ?
Service provided to the vast majority of British children
Oversea the way education is run through the production and enforcement of their policies
The tripartite system
- 1944
- Children would take the 11+ and those who passed would be sent to Grammar schools, those who failed would be sent to secondary moderns or technical schools
Benefits of the tripartite system
- Helped sift and sort pupils according to ability meaning they could persue a secondary ed. which better suited their needs
- First time Britain introduced compulsory education + seen as meritocratic
Criticisms of the tripartite system
- failed to enact social mobility
- reinforced gender inequalities by making it more difficult for girls to pass the 11+ so women often placed in a secondary modern where they could study home economics and childcare
- Maintained class inequalities, the majority of those in grammar schools were M.C. due to being able to afford tuition + there was a middle class habitus
- Unis ended up being M.C.
Comprehensive system + aims
- 1965
- Aimed to : remove the 11+ requirement, introduce a catchment system and introduce a national curriculum
Failures of the comprehensive system
- Unlike Acts, LEAs were not obligated to replace their tripartite system with a comprehensive one and many initially refused
- Due to it being based on pupils attending local schools, social mixing didn’t happen
- There are practices in comprehensive schools eg setting, streaming and negative labelling
Successes of the comprehensive system
- equal opportunities eg same curriculum
- The comp system acknowledged that 11 year olds developed at different times
- enables social integration
Shift to neoliberalism in politics
- Thatcher 1979 : free market politics, limited government intervention, competitive and marketisation
Education reform act
- 1988
- aimed to reduce state control over schools + encourage the marketisation of schools
- Reforms included : removal of catchment areas and replacement with open enrolments, introduction of a national curriculum and the same national assessments so the results could be comparable, introduce league tables, establish ofsted and introduction of the formula funding
- created a more competitive system
- Raises the standards of education overall (Marketisation)
- Raises the standards of education overall
- NR claim its raises standards because schools are dependent on the custom of parents so they need to work harder to be successful
- funding wasn’t guaranteed so teachers have more motivation to work hard and support the pupils who need it
- Helps reduce inequalities in achievement (marketisation)
- Helps reduce inequalities in achievement
- schools in areas with issues eg poverty must work hard to gain funding so teachers are more likely to provide effective support for disadvantaged pupils specifically the formula funding is a motivator
Why marketisation is effective ?
- Raises the standards of education overall
- Helps reduce inequalities in achievement
- Marketisation gives parents more control in education
Criticisms of the effectiveness of marketisation
- There are a number of barriers which effect a school’s success eg demographic makeup of pupils
It is too simplistic to say schools will do better because odd being motivated to work harder - There is no guarantee that the funding formula will genuinely help reduce inequalities in achievement - there are external factors
- Not true for all parents eg WC likely to be less knowledgeable
Challenges to parentocracy
- Gewitz : found there were 3 types of parents when selecting a good school
- skilled privileged choosers (MC, Economic capital and knew to look at ofsted reports)
- Disconnected local choosers (WC, lacked cultural capital, placed a high value on the schools appearance, lacked economic capital so sent their kids to the closest school)
- Semi-skilled choosers (WC but more ambitious, lacked cultural capital, wanted them to go to a good school but lacked knowledge on the application process)
- Ball agrees saying it also helps justify inequality as it reinforces the myth of meritocracy
Challenges to marketisation (general not the theories)
- Marketisation encourages schools to be more selective in their recruitment
- Ball = schools are under immense pressure to achieve good gcse results
- Barlett = this encourages schools to cream skim eg white mc pupils and silt sift eg only offer applications online so only affluent families can access it
- Schools who underperform cannot be selective thus a cycle of underperforming occurs each year