Educational Policy Flashcards
Social policy
Educational policy - refers to strategies for education introduced by government with recommendations to schools -> respond to issues of - equal opportunities // selection & choice //control of education// marketisation & privatisation.
Selection: Tripartite system
1944 Education Act brought in tripartite system allowing children to be selected by 3 different types of schools based on abilities
-Grammar schools (mainly MC)
-Secondary modern schools (non academic curriculum)
-Technical schools (very few) and later scrapped
Instead of promoting meritocracy -> produced class inequality by separating 2 social classes into 2 schools offering unequal opportunities
Comprehensive school system
Introduced in 1965 -aimed to make education ^ meritocratic
- 11+ exam was abolished along with grammar and secondary moderns replaced with comprehensive schools.
- However, decision was left to local authorities so divide between classes remains in some areas.
Two theories of the role of comprehensives
Functionalists argue comprehensives promote social integration and meritocratic selection -> brings children of different social classes together. -Ford’s(S) study-> little social mixing between classes due to streaming Marxists argue comprehensives as non-meritocratic -> producing class inequality through streaming and labelling -> deny WC opportunities.
Marketisation
Refers to process of introducing market forces of consumer choice and competition - Marketisation has created an ‘education market ‘ by -reducing state control over education // increasing competition between schools and parental choice of schools.
1988- Education Reform Act -> Marketisation was a central theme
-Critics claim reproduction of inequalities as exam league tables show best and worst -> increasing inequalities.
Parentocracy
Policies to promote marketisation include: #Publication of league tables and Ofsted inspection reports according to exam performance and ranks the schools in order. (Parents attracted to good rankings thus widening gap of inequality) —— #Formula funding -schools receive same amount of funding for each pupil (Popular schools gain more funding, attract more pupils through better facilities and better teachers, poor schools lose income)
Gewirtz: Parental choice
-Found differences in parents economic and cultural capital lead to class differences in choosing secondary school. #Privileged-skilled choosers (Professional MC parents using EC and CC to gain educational capital) #Disconnected local choosers (WC parents restricted by EC and CC) #Semi-skilled choosers(WC parents with more ambition for children)
Myth of parentocracy
Ball(S)-Marketisation gives appearance of ‘parentocracy’
Ball(S)-Parentocracy is a myth (parents have free choice of school) -> Gerwitz shows MC parents are take better advantage of choices -> can afford better catchment areas of good schools.
-> disguises fact that schooling reproduces class inequality.
New Labour and inequality (1997 - 2010)
New Labour introduced policies to reduce inequalities: -Designating deprived areas as Education Action Zones -> providing additional resources. -Education Maintenance Allowances(EMA) -> payments to low income background students -> encourages staying on +16 for qualifications. Critics Benn (S) - sees contradiction in policies -> higher tuition fees for education system -> discourages from university.
Coalition Government from 2010
- Polices strongly influenced by Neoliberal and New Right ideas about reducing the role of the state in provision of education -> marketisation & privatisation.
- cuts were made to education budget -> reduce general state spending.
Academies
2010- All schools encouraged to leave authority control and become academies -> funding given to academies -> academies had full control over curriculum.
-Coalition allowed any school to become academy -> remove focus on reducing inequality whereas labour targeted disadvantaged schools.
Free Schools
Set up by parents, teacher organisations or businesses.
- improve educational standards -> takes control away from state -> gives power & opportunities to create schools if unhappy with local.
- Critics claim free schools are socially divisive -> lower standards -> Sweden’s International Ranking has fallen since introduction.
Privatisation of education
- Privatisation involves transfer of public assets (school) to private companies -> trend has grown towards privatisation-> education becomes source of profit.
- Private companies earn very high profits from ^ activities
- Local authorities have to agree to these agreements -> lack offending from government.
Policies on gender
-19th century -females largely excluded from higher education -> tripartite system (girls had to achieve higher marks than boys) -> to obtain a grammar school place.
Policies on ethnicity
Multicultural education police (1980s & 90s) -> promote achievements of children from EM groups -> by valuing ALL cultures -> increasing self esteem.
However - Stone(S)claims black pupils do not fail for lack of self esteem, rather racism.