Educational policies affecting gender and ethnicity Flashcards
Tripartite system
11* exam
Girls had to get higher score than boys to get in to grammar school (boys-80%) (girls-90%)
Although it gave them the opportunity to go to grammar school or university
National curriculum
Made things equal for girls for the first. time as they were now doing the same subjects as boys
GIST (Girls into science and technology)
This involved female scientists visiting schools, non-sexist career advice and learning materials that reflected equality
WISE (Women into science and engineering)
Encouraged girls to get involved with subjects traditionally aimed at boys
Introduction of coursework
Made it easier for girls to compete as they were more conscientious and put more effort it
Extra writing classes for boys at primary school
Grants were given to primary schools to help boys with their literacy, so they could push up their SAT results
Reduction of coursework
Meant girls no longer had an advantage over boys
Evaluation of policies that affect different genders
There is still a divide in terms of education achievement with girls outperforming boys at all stages of education.
GIST and WISE lead to increase in girls taking ‘male’ subjects however other factors such as: gendered subject images, career opportunities, identity and teachers still play a significant role in keeping these as male subject areas.
Critics argue that focus and money spent on policies to improve boys achievement is further penalising girls positions in education
Assimilation- (you became the same as another group) (1960’s/1970’s)
To help ethnicity minority students to fit in with British culture e.g. to learn english language and norms and values
what was the social inclusion policy
involved detailed monitoring of exam results by ethnicity. Schools had a legal duty to promote the race relations act. Saturday schools were introduced in the black communities and help was given learning english as a second language
Multi cultural education policies
aimed to value all cultures in the school curriculum, thereby raising minority pupils self esteem and achievement
Direct evaluation of policies that affect ethnic minorities
- Some groups at risk of underachieving. Critics argue poverty or racism could be the real cause of their underachievement
- Marketisation policies such as parentocracy had a negative effect on some ethnic minorities as they couldn’t ‘play the system’
- Multicultural education has been criticised as mere tokenism and fails to tackle institutional racism