Educational Attainment - Ethnicity Flashcards
Key trends in educational attainment and ethnicity
- There are noticeable differences in the attainment of each group, according to the Attainment 8 scoring system. Minority ethnic groups, such as Chinese and Indian students, achieve much higher than other groups. In contrast, Black Caribbean and White students perform worse than their peers. Black African students however perform better than the latter groups, possibly explained by the differences in culture between the two groups of BC and BA.
- C & I = overachieve in comparison to peers, B = variation between A and C, Asian students = differences in Bangladeshi, Pakistani and Indian achievement. White students have only slightly higher achievement than black students (as a group) but this gap is closing.
Asian families and educational attainment
- Basit (2013) - Indian and Pakistani families have a culture of promoting educational capital to obtain social mobility
- Bhatti (1999) - Parents were more supportive of children’s education and hgh levels of interest in their children’s achievement
- Modood (2006) - suggests it is typical parental behaviour of all social classes, with W/C Asian families promoting staying on in education.
Chinese families and educational attainment
- Chinese students: Perform significantly higher than all other groups
- Francis (2007) - suggested that this is because of the high value placed on education by both parents and children regardless of social class, and the additional resources that are provided such as money and time that are given to students to help them achieve the goal of attending university
- Modood (2004) - parental cultural capital (economic capital and educational capital are equal in importance) is passed onto children from previous occupations pushes higher achievement. Parents invest in children so they look after them in old age, and this investment includes a very good education.
Black families and educational attainment
- An explanation for the differences in black achievement through parental support is that there is a greater support network of extended family and friends in black African families that promote educational achievement.
- Sewell - single parent families have created less parental support for black students (24% of black households are single parent, in comparison to 19% of mixed households and 10% of white households). The workload placed on mothers means that they cannot dedicate the time to support the education of their children; issues with this include the reliance on over generalisation, with the statistics showing that more BA families are single parent than BC families, but BA is on average higher than BC and white achievement.
- It also discounts the impact of working mothers on black girls, whose achievement is on par with their peers. It also assumes that most families in this ethnic group are W/C; however, Vincent et al (2011) suggested that black middle-class parents had high levels of interest in their children’s education. This suggests that internal factors are the issue with underachievement in some groups of black students.
Why do you need to be careful here?
There are differences in achievement between different black groups - BA achieve higher than average and higher than BC students
Intersectionality with attainment
- Black girls - achieve on par with other ethnic groups in – W/C families - this could be the exposure to role models and higher ambitions that boost their motivation to achieve.
- Class also interacts with ethnicity, with middle-class black families having more interest in their children’s education.
- In some cases, even lower class of C&I families overachieve compare to the middle class students of other ethnic groups.
Do not make generalisations by lumping different Asian cultures into one band of achievement - discuss variations in broad ethnic groups. White students do not achieve better than other ethnicities, and there are attainment gaps within different White groups.
Evaluations of these theories
- Intersectional nature of student’s experiences - class and gender impact achievement
- Some research (1960s and 70s) is dated and based on crude stereotypes and generalisations of ethnic groups, and because it is based on the first generation of migrants (Windrush generations) it does not help explain educational achievement in 2nd or 3rd generations who have been exposed to the norms and values of British society and socialised dually
- Despite the high achievements of some ethnic minority groups, there are still differences in life chances in society for Pakistani, Bangladeshi and black students in comparison to white, Chinese and Indian groups - e.g. unemployment, average earnings, representation at universities
What is ethnicity? + the doll test
Ethnic group - People who share a common history, customs and identity, as well as, in most cases, language and religion, and who see themselves as a distinct unit.
- The “doll test” is a psychological experiment designed in the 1940s in the USA to test the degree of marginalization felt by African American children caused by prejudice, discrimination and racial segregation (Clark and Clark).
- This impacts achievement as there are ingrained stereotypes that may impact ethnic identity and a personal interpretation of a student’s ability to achieve
Trends in attainment across ethnic groups
- Bangladeshi students are the ethnic group most entitled to Free School Meals.
- In all ethnic groups, W/C students underachieve in comparison to their non-FSM counterparts. However, even FSM Chinese students achieve higher than non-FSM students in all other groups, and so their achievement is different by class but they still generally as an ethnic group achieve at a certain point.
- 75% of students at Russell Group Universities are White students, with less than 5% being Black students. This shows that there is an ethnic bias in university opportunity, as despite White students underperforming in comparison to Chinese students, there are a disproportionate amount attending high class universities for their achievement level. White students are also more likely to achieve a 1st class degree than other ethnic groups.
- Chinese girls are the group with the highest achievement and attainment across all groups, with White British boys underachieving and having the lowest attainment of all groups.
External factors that affect the achievement of ethnic groups - Material deprivation
Strand (2015):
- Longitudinal study of 15,000 students in England
- Analysed the differences in attainment of various ethnic groups
- The attainment gap due to social class was twice as large as the biggest ethnic gap and six times as large as gender
- Other factors also need to be consider
External factors that affect the achievement of ethnic groups - Parental, Student and School factors
- Parental attitudes and behaviour were ‘significantly associated with attainment’. Parents expectations that students would continue their education after the age of 16 were particularly important as were providing a computer for their children and a private tutor.
- In general, ethnic minority parents were more likely than White British parents to have positive attitudes and behaviour towards education.
Strand -
Student factors - Strand divides student factors which encourage high attainment and risk factors which reduce attainment levels
1. High attainment - Resilience factors include a strong academic self-concept, a positive attitude towards school, planning for the future, hoping to continue education after age 16 and completing homework every evening, ethnic minorities were likely to have higher levels of resilience factors than White British students.
2. Risk factors include special educational needs, having been excluded from school (high for Black Caribbean students) extended absence from school (high for Pakistani students), truancy, involvement with police, welfare and social services, and overall risk factors were most likely found in White British groups. - School factors - In general, the quality of the school appeared to have only a moderate effect on educational attainment except in the case of Black Caribbean students where factors such as teacher’s expectations might make a difference.
- Ethnocentric curriculum
- Lupton (2004) argues that adult authority in Asian families is similar to that of school = respectful behaviour.
External factors that affect the achievement of ethnic groups - Class, gender and ethnicity
- White students attainment more affected by class than others.
- Ethnic subculture (negative and positive) play a part
- White w/c at the bottom for both genders. The gender gap is bigger in Black Caribbean and Bangladeshi students in favour of girls
- Modood (2004) - class affects White students more than other groups
External factors that affect the achievement of ethnic groups - Recent immigration
- Strand suggests that recent immigration may be a factor in explaining the relatively high performance of low-income minority ethnic groups compared to low income White working-class student.
- Strand 2008 - ‘More recent groups often see education as a way out of the poverty they have come from. By contrast, if you’ve been in a White working-class family for 3 generations, with high unemployment, you don’t necessarily believe that education is going to change that.’
- Multi-language students perform better than students who have English as a first language, motivation to work hard to get out of poverty
External factors that affect the achievement of ethnic groups - Ethnic group subcultures
- Parents from all social classes placed a very high value on education, as did their children. Working Class parents with little formal education were ‘passionately committed to providing their children with the opportunities they lacked’. Both middle and working class parents saw university as ‘a must’. All 80 students interviewed said they wanted to go to university.
- Parents invested considerable time, energy and money in their children. Monitored children’s progress; education was a ‘family project’. A family’s standing in the community was partly related to educational performance of their children, children appreciate their parents high expectations, encouragement and support - applied to both middle and working class.
- The high value placed on education is due to Chinese subculture. The high attainment of Chinese Students may be partly the result of their subculture.
- Evans - Street culture for White w/c is brutal and power games of intimidation exist; schools are places where this is further acted out through disruption where they gain status
- Louis Archer and Becky Francis (2007) - semi-structured interview with 80 14 to 16 year old British Chinese students, 30 Chinese parents and 30 Chinese teachers from London schools with Chinese students.
External factors that affect the achievement of ethnic groups - Cultural Capital
- Chinese and Indians have the largest proportion of middle-class members and the highest attainment. Their attainment may result in from having the largest amount of cultural capital.
- Many members of minority ethnic groups have more cultural capital than would be expected from their present class position. This may be because their jobs after migrating to the UK were lower in pay and prestige than their previous job.
- Bourdieu’s idea of of cultural capital may help to explain the educational attainment of some ethnic minority students.
- However Tarqid Modood (2004) states that those who have low cultural capital should not be achieving as much as they do.
Black-Caribbean achievement - The background and policies + key words
Marketisation - Schools are organised like a business
League Tables - Ranking of school results
Ethnocentrism - A belief that one culture is more superior than another
Institutional Racism - Racial prejudice and discrimination that are part of assumptions and operations of institutions
The background -
- 1980s-1990s; focus on Black Caribbean male ‘underachievement’
- Racism in schools - no policies were developed to address this
- Black subculture was said to be causing this underachievement
Policies -
- The focus is changing from the 1990s to help black achievement
- (2003) - Department of Education’s Aim High - African Caribbean Achievement Project
- This showed that students experienced lower expectations by schools and schools were asked to address this, although made no real difference to achievement levels at KS3 and KS4
- However, ethnocentrism continues National Curriculum, with black people being excluded almost entirely from the primary curriculum and only appearing as slaves or refugees in secondary