Education Acts Flashcards
Forster education act 1970
Created primary schools in Britain for all children aged 5-11 to ensure a better educated workforce so Britain could remain strong in industry and manufacturing on the world stage
Butler education act 1944
- education began to be shaped by meritocracy
- created secondary schools and tripartite system - students allocated to one of 3 schools based on ability done through 11+ exam
- grammar, secondary modern and technical
The comprehensive system 1965
- aimed to overcome class divide and make education more meritocratic
- catchment areas
- streaming
What’s the problem with the comprehensive system?
Children living in expensive catchment areas have the opportunity to attend the best schools and more white m/c students attending as their parents have the cultural capital to check league tables and economic stability to move if need be. Continued to reproduce class inequality
Education reform act 1988
- introduced by thatchers conservative government to increase competition between schools (by doing so, standards would increase)
- introduced principle of marketisation and national curriculum so schools can be easily compared.
Marketisation
Schools encouraged to compete against each other and act more like private businesses rather than institutions under the control of local government
Examples of marketisation
League tables, ofsted report, open enrolment, parentocracy
Parentocracy
Miriam David - rule by parents. Schools increasingly run like businesses, all attempting to attract the most parents to send their children to that school
How has marketisation helped and hindered education?
Schools now have an incentive to raise standards and keep improving, as a result standards of education improve, benefiting all pupils. However, Witty and Ball argue marketisation reproduces class based inequalities
Who identified cream skimming and silt shifting?
Bartlett and Le Grand
Cream skimming
M/c pupils get the best education, schools that do well in league tables are attractive to parents and in high demand. These schools can be selective over which pupils they take as they are over subscribed, only recruiting m/c high achieving pupils to ensure they keep doing well in league tables
Silt shifting
Schools that do badly in league tables/ofsted reports enter a spiral of decline as they lose potential pupils to better schools and therefore cannot be selective over the pupils they select. They end up taking less able pupils, with parents perceiving these as sink schools resulting in w/c pupils getting a poorer education
Formula funding
Whitty argues popular schools get more funding, meaning they can afford better resources/better qualified teachers. Schools reputation grows and can attract savvy m/c parents, meaning they can cream skim more able pupils and avoid taking less able pupils who damage schools results, called silt shifting
Who identified privileged skill choosers, disconnected local choosers, semi skilled choosers?
Gerwitz
Privileged skill choosers
- professional m/c parents using th eir cultural + economic capital to gain educational capital for their children
- manipulates the system to get the best school