Education Flashcards
Functionalism - 3 functions of Education - help society?
- Teaches skills needed in work & by economy2. Sifts & Sorts people for appr. jobs = allocation function3. Secondary socialisation, passing on core values
Funcationalists? (3)
DurkheimDavis & MooreParsons
Durkheim - education? (2)
Passes on norms & values - to integrate individuals into society = Helps to create social order based on cohesion & value consensus
Parsons? (2)
Schools pass on a universal value of achievement Ed. selects children into appr. roles - meritocratic + agree with Durkheim & n/vs
Davis & Moore? (3)
Ev. society sorts its members into diff. positions There’s rules for how ed. does this - “principles of satisfaction”= Has to be system of unequal rewards to motv. people to train for top pos’tions
Functionalist perspective? (2)
Meritocratic - when social rewards allc’d by talent/effort than pos. born intoTal+Motv+Equ Opp - quals & high pos. in society
Marxists believe:How? (3)
Ed. legitimises inequality through ideology1. Prepares child for world of work by giving skills & values they’ll need2. Justifies inequality3. Passes on ruling ideology that supports capitalism
Marxists? (4)
AlthusserBowles & GintisWillis Bourdieu
Althusser: (2)
Sees ed as part of “ideological state apparatus” - Tool of capitalism - used to pass on belief that society is fair=> docile & obedient workforce
Bowles & Gintis: (3)(2)
Correspondence between pupil experiences of school & adult work:Hierarchy in bothMotivated by grades to do boring w - work rewards with paySchool/work reward subservience/following rulesHidden curriculum - hw/punctuality = prepares people for work + meritocracy = myth used to blame indv. for not succeeding
Willis
Ed doesn’t turn out an obedient workforce - some kids form an anti-school subculture & cope with school/work by mucking
Bourdieu
Middle class get to top because of cultural capital - lang/skills/knwledge/attitudes
Criticisms of functionalism (3)
Evd. of differential achievement in terms of class/gender/ethn = suggests ed’s not meritocraticEd. doesn’t prepare people for work e.g. lack of eng. grads = ed. failing to prod what employers/eco needsDoesn’t explain conflict
Criticisms of Marxists (2)
Assumes people are passive victims - exg how much w.c studs are socialised into obedience (Willis)Most people, aware of inequality
Similarities between functionalist & marxist views (2)Difference:
Ignore social interactionBoth say ed. has huge impact on indv & close link with eco & workInequality:Marxists -> ed. helps to maintain/make people accept inequalityFuncts -> ed passes on value of meritocracy/lets people better themselves