Education Flashcards

1
Q

Human capital theory

A
  • Private returns (income) to education. Positive correlation
  • Still depends on quality of education
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Signalling theory

A
  • Schooling = signal (to show that you have skills). NOT necessarily a way to acquire valuable skills.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How does signalling theory work?

A
  • Problem: information asymmetry between employer and job candidate
  • During the interview, the employer does not know the candidate’s productivity. E hires C blindly (lottery)
  • At time +1, the employer hires another C or not based on the SAME CV if the C proved to be productive (statistical discrimination, not taste-based discrimination)
  • For a C, certain characteristics cannot be changed, but education can.
  • Students chose to study if the costs to acquire this signal are less than the wage potentially earned.
  • Therefore, schooling is only a SIGNAL.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Implications of human capital theory and signalling theory?

A

Increase in education for all is associated with:
HCT: GDP increases
Signaling theory: GDP stays the same

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How to calculate? Empirical impact of education: micro studies

A

Estimate (for a bunch of individuals i):
Log(Wage i) = a + b * School i + c *Experience i + d * Experience i 2
- All studies find a b between 0.05 and 0.15 so:
- 1 more year of education brings between 5% and 15% more salary
- Strongest correlation in the US. Weakest in Sweden.
- Low impact in OECD/high income countries (many years of schooling, low rates of return.) High impact in Sub-Saharan/low income Africa (fewer years of schooling give very high returns).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Problem of microstudies?

A

Econometric problems:

  • reverse causality
  • omitted variable bias:
    1) abilities
    2) entrepreneurial spirit
    3) curiosity
  • measurement error:
    1) authors use qty of education (number of years)
    2) but what matters is quality

Solutions?

  • Control for other factors (but what is ability?)
  • Use twins
  • use randomised experiments
  • use natural experiments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Angrist et al. (1991) experieme nt

A

Impact of month of birth in education?

2 laws worth considering:

1) you must be 6 yrs old on the 1st of January of the year you start school
2) the minimum legal age to stop is 16

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Examples of Angrist et al. experiment:

A
  • A born Feb 1990: A can start in Sep 1996
  • B born Dec 1989: B can start in Sep 1995

If both drop out at 16 yrs old:

  • A can stop Feb 2006: 9 yrs, 5 months of schooling
  • B can stop Dec 2005: 10 yrs, 2 months of schooling

Conclusion:
A and B similar individuals, but B gets 10 months more schooling

Results?
- compare wage of A and B: 1 more year brings 7% increase in salary (only valid for USA when students drop out at 16)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Problems with micro studies in measuring impact of education?

A
  • We’re only measuring private returns, not social returns
  • Maybe social returns more than private if positive externalities for society:
  • Peer effect
  • Technological progress
  • Decrease in crime
  • Informed political decisions
  • Decrease in fertility
  • Improvement in health
  • Increase in labour force participation
  • Maybe social returns less than private if education is just a signal (Spence, 1973)
  • Social returns can only be captured by macro studies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Estimates (for a bunch of countries i) on a macro-scale:

A

Log(Yi )= a + b * School i
This will capture direct and indirect effects of S (society) on Y
(income)

Problems?

  • Reverse causality
  • OVB (good policies)
  • Measurement error of S
  • Measurement error across countries (not the same methodology)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Conclusion midway education lecture?

A
Micro studies:
\+ = good identification strategy
- = does not measure externalities (social returns)
Macro studies:	
\+ = measure externalities
- = no identification strategy
But both give results: 1 year -> 5,15% wage, GDP
Education matters for growth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Camera study Duflo et al. (2005)

A
  • Rural India
  • Teacher absenteeism of 44%
  • Intervention in 60 (randomly) out of 120 schools:
  • Give a camera to teachers
  • Teachers have to take 1 picture with all students at the beginning of the day, and 1 at the end
  • Date and time is written on these pictures (not possible to tamper with the system)
  • A valid day: a day with these 2 pictures
  • 1 valid day=50 Rs (=6$)
  • Wage may vary between 500 Rs And 1300 Rs
  • In other schools, wage = 1000 Rs

Researchers organized surprise visits to measure absenteeism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly