Education Flashcards
What is Smith and Noble’s study about?
-SOCIAL CLASS: MATERIAL DEPRIVATION
-material factors, such as a family income, have a huge impact upon the achievement of working class pupils. A poverty-penalty exists to prevent working class pupils from fulfilling their potential. Working-class pupils therefore face huge ‘barriers to learning’.
What are the two examples for external factors (home) explaining social class differences in educational achievement?
1) Material Deprivation
2) Cultural Deprivation
What are two evaluation points for Smith and Noble and one contemporary example?
-they overly generalise. They have been accused of presenting a deterministic view of the relationship between material deprivation and underachievement.
-measures are now in place to tackle material disadvantages. e.g. pupil premium, schools receive around £1000 for every eligible pupil.
-a contemporary example is children from middle class homes will have averaged an additional 7 days a month studying at home, compared to their poorer peers.
What is Callender and Jackson’s study about?
-SOCIAL CLASS: MATERIAL DEPRIVATION
-did analysis of questionnaire responses. Found that working class students are 5x less likely to apply for university. Fear of debt was the most significant reason given.
-they argue that higher education is a privilege for the elite.
What is an evaluation point for Callender and Jackson’s study?
-Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party pledged to scrap tuition fees in the run-up to the 2019 General Election, partly due to the fact that they disadvantage low-income, working class students from studying at university.
-THIS SHOWS THAT THIS IS A SIGNIFICANT ISSUE
What is Barry Sugarman’s study about?
-SOCIAL CLASS: CULTURAL DEPRIVATION
-there is a lower class subculture in society that working class pupils are often born into and become a part of. These result in a self-imposed barrier to success.
-these involve fatalistic values (wc students feeling they lack control over their future), immediate gratification (seeking immediate pleasures and rewards), collectivism (prioritising friendships and socialising).
What is an evaluation for Barry Sugarman’s study?
-Sugarman is accused of imperialism. He is accused of making value-judgments about working class people.
What is Bernstein’s study about and what is one evaluation point for this?
-SOCIAL CLASS: CULTURAL DEPRIVATION
-he examined a specific component of cultural deprivation, speech and language use. He identified the two main types of ‘speech code’.
-restricted speech code: informal, short, simple (WC)
-elaborated speech code: formal, good vocab (MC)
-government policy provides support for Bernstein’s views, schools are encouraged to promote oracy skills and literacy across curriculum.
What is Pierre Bourdieu’s study about and what is one evaluation point for this?
-SOCIAL CLASS: CULTURAL DEPRIVATION
-he researched what middle class parents and their children possess/have. It is the cultural capital (knowledge of the education systems) of middle class parents that help their children to succeed in school. He uses the concept habitus in referring to the typical ‘ways of doing things’. Middle class habitus includes a healthy, pro-education socialisation from an early age.
-determining a person’s cultural capital is very subjective, it is a difficult concept to operationalise (simplify).
What is Gill Evans study about and what is an evaluation point for this? (EVALUATES CULTURAL DEPRIVATION ARGUMENT)
-spent 1.5 years conducting field work on a working class council estate, Found that in most cases, parents did care about their child’s education. They just weren’t as skilled in knowing how to help their children at home.
-perhaps the parents Evans spoke to told her what she wanted to hear, so that they looked good in her eyes, social desirability effect.
What is Bathmaker et Al’s study about and what is an evaluation point for this?
-SOCIAL CLASS: SOCIAL,CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC CAPITAL
-based on the findings from a longitudinal study, involving a group of working class students at Bristol’s two universities, they looked at the relationship between cultural, social and economic capital.
-they found clear evidence that middle class students go to university ‘better equipped’ for success, but importantly they built upon their advantages while studying their courses.
-he found that middle class students recognise how to use their social capital to organise and arrange relevant work experience to ‘add value’ to their degree.
-rather than university providing a means to ‘balance up’ the unequal playing field between working class and middle class students, it helped to widen social class differences in achievement.
-a sample of students from Bristol in south-west England may not be entirely representative of students across the rest of the country
What are examples of internal factors explaining social class differences in educational achievement?
-1) Teacher labelling
-2) setting and streaming
-3) pupil subcultures
What is Dunne and Gazeley’s study (Labelling process) about?
-negative teacher labelling is the single most important cause of working class pupils’ underachievement. Teachers were found to normalise working class underachievement. A self-fulfilling prophecy of underachievement often results, where working class pupils internalise negative labels attached to them. Middle class pupils are seen to be hard-working and committed to their studies acting as a ‘halo effect’ and they are considered ‘ideal pupils’
-LABELLING PROCESS:
-labelling takes place, based upon stereotypes.
-a Master Status forms, as some labels stick.
-The label is internalised, a self-fulfilling prophecy.
-pupil subcultures form, as pupils who are labelled gravitate to each other.
What are two evaluation points for Dunne and Gazeley?
-only used nine secondary schools in England, sample was relatively small, may not have been a representative sample.
-could be seen as deterministic and many of the evidence used is based on judgements, rather than hard evidence.
What does setting and streaming and what is a contemporary example that shows this?
-‘setting’ refers to where pupils are grouped according to their ability in a particular subject.
-‘streaming’ is where pupils are put into broadly similar ability groups across all their subjects.
-evidence suggests that decisions about which set/stream a pupil is put into can be influenced by social class stereotypes that teachers hold.
-a contemporary example is a BBC news article in 2017 drew attention to the controversy surrounding the grouping of children by ability from Reception at primary school.
What is Jo Boaler’s study about?
SOCIAL CLASS: SETTING AND STREAMING (internal)
- Boaler conducted a study of students aged 13-16 in maths in two secondary schools.
-School A was taught in mixed ability classes. No particular social class differences in achievement were found.
-School B involved use of setting. Students felt that the set they were in determined how teachers regarded their ability.
-one student from ‘School B’ felt as if it was a ‘psychological prison’
What is pupil subcultures?
-negatively labelling pupils can lead to the formation of deviant pupil subcultures.