Crime and Deviance: Theories Flashcards
-Functionalism -Sub-cultural -Marxism
What is the main functionalist theory on crime and deviance?
-for functionalists, explanations for why crime occurs can be found by examining society, rather than other factors such as ethnicity and gender.
-The vast majority of people in society are law-abiding, whereas criminals are a minority.
-effective socialisation combined with effective social control ensures that crime rates remain relatively low, and that society is essentially a healthy place to be a part of.
What is Hirschi’s “Control Theory” about (FUNCTIONALIST)?
-The stronger a person’s social bonds, the less likely they are to commit crime. These bonds include: attachment to institutions (family and school), commitment to our roles and responsibilities, involvement in our commitments and a belief in morality.
-most criminals lack strong bonds in the above ways, which explain why committing crime and other deviant acts are more likely for them.
What is an evaluation and a contemporary example for Hirschi’s theory?
-Is crime always committed by those with weak social bonds? There are many white-collar crimes committed by middle-class offenders who have strong social bonds.
-Footballer, Wayne Rooney was prosecuted for drink-driving in 2017. This contradicts Hirschi’s argument in that Rooney does not lack strong bonds to others and society.
What is Durkheim’s theory on value consensus + boundary maintenance(FUNCTIONALIST)?
-Durkheim believed that society is held together by people agreeing to, and buying into a value consensus.
-As Durkheim said, positive social change often begins with some form of deviance. Value consensus should be firm, but not so firm that it prevents change for the better taking place.
-According to Durkheim, crime re-affirms the boundaries of the collective conscience. For example, when a horrific crime occurs, people are drawn together to express their outrage. This restrengthens the common bonds that people share with one another and therefore, acts as a form of boundary maintenance.
What is a contemporary example for Durkheim’s theory on boundary maintenance?
-In New Zealand (2019), terrorist shootings at mosques left 51 people dead. It was committed by a white supremacist. Needless to say, these attacks shocked the world, resulting in Muslims and non-Muslims alike united in grief for those who were lost.
What is an evaluation for Durkheim’s theory on value consensus + boundary maintenance?
-Isn’t crime a symptom of social solidarity having broken down?
-Despite Durkheim’s claim that some crime re-affirms the boundaries of the ‘collective conscience’, it could be argued that terrorist attacks such as that seen in Paris are actually a reflection of social solidarity having broken down.
What is Durkheim’s theory on crime being functional in providing jobs?
-Crime provides jobs for people in society. Without crime, there would be no prison staff, no judges, no criminal lawyers etc…
-High unemployment is dysfunctional for any society, and an absence of the thousands of jobs relating to crime and justice would make this worse. This can cause anomie.
What is Durkheim’s theory on crime having a deterrence function?
-open court rooms and punishments have a deterrence function.
-members of the public are able to sit in the viewing gallery of court rooms. This is so that each and every member of society can see that the CJS is fair, and that those guilty of committing crime are suitably punished. This is important, since a healthy CJS is essential in allowing the public to have faith in it.
-A wider deterrence function also exists, however. All members of the public see what happens to somebody who commits crime, it is hoped that they too are reminded about what the boundaries of acceptable and unacceptable behaviour are. Again, this creates boundary maintenance.
What is an evaluation for Durkheim’s argument on crime having a deterrence function?
-Deterrence is only effective in cases where the offender has planned their crimes. For those who act upon impulse, deterrence is ineffective. Furthermore, there is a high rate of recidivism (re-offending) among those who have spent much time in prison, which arguably shows that even the toughest punishments don’t have the desired deterrence effect.
How does restorative justice punishment support the argument of crime having a deterrence function?
-there are restorative justice punishments such as community sentences. Community sentences involve offenders tidying parks, building community facilities etc..
-This helps offenders to re-integrate back into society and allows the public to see that the offenders values aren’t that different from their own.
-This acts as a deterrence function as it can cut re-offending rates and can allow social solidarity to be restrengthened following crime.
What is a contemporary example on restorative justice punishments?
-a successful example of restorative justice at work relates to ex-offender, Peter Woolf who formed a restorative justice punishment inspired charity called ‘Why Me?’. Peter Woolf points out that that it was facing the reality that his actions have consequences on the lives of others that became a turning point in his life, resulting in him being determined to put his past behind him. This example supports functionalist views that crime should always bring about a healing benefit to individuals and society.
What is Kingsley Davis’ theory and an evaluation(FUNCTIONALIST)?
-prostitution can benefit institutions like the family. He claims that pornography can be a means of allowing men to channel their sexual frustration in a way that prevents them from committing sexual offences. Prostitution, he claims, acts as a safety valve for the family in promoting its stability in society.
-However, this theory is considered to be far-fetched, and an insult to women in particular. Kingsley-Davis is accused of being highly irresponsible in putting his views forward and he receives little support even from fellow functionalists.
What is Durkheim’s view on when crime becomes dysfunctional for society and what is a contemporary example for this?
-crime only becomes a problem for society when it spirals out of control. Too much crime is, therefore, unhealthy, and leads to anomie (social chaos).
-In 2003, President Saddam Hussain of Iraq was toppled from power through a combination of revolution by the Iraqi people and an American-led invasion. As his regime collapsed, so did law and order leading to many crimes.
-The breakdown of social control made Iraq’s problems worse in many ways and is an example of anomie.
-However, Durkheim also points out that having low crime rates may not be a good thing as it could be an indication that society is not in a healthy place, as people don’t have very much meaning that there is little for others to take off them in criminal ways.
What is are two evaluations about Durkheim including one from a Marxist perspective?
-Durkheim’s study doesn’t explain individual criminality.He is accused of taking a highly positivist approach in examining crime on a larger-scale. He ignores the finer details about why a person commits crime, while another does not, despite both having a relatively similar relationship to others in wider society.
-Durkheim overlooks the flaws within the CJS processes. Marxists accuse Durkheim of overlooking how social class bias underpins the CJS. It is the poor who experience crime the most, and it is the poor who are unfairly punished the most too. Rather than strengthening social solidarity, the CJS uses criminal behaviour to strengthen inequalities that capitalist societies such as Britain are founded upon.
What is Robert Merton’s theory?
-as a functionalist, Merton also saw society itself as the main cause of crime. He explored how the USA has such a high crime rate, and how American values are ultimately behind this.
-The ‘American Dream’ underpins core values in the USA. It encourages everybody to work hard to achieve personal success.
-The legitimate meansof doing this include hard work at school, and hard work in a chosen career. For working class Americans, the ‘dreams’ can seem remote and unachievable. Strain is felt as wc people attempt to achieve the dream legitimately, yet are quickly pulled back by their wc roots. This can result in anomie, resulting in responses among others.
What are the three responses Merton claim that working class Americans give in response to anomie?
-conformity:vast majority of wc Americans continue to pursue the goal (American dream) and the legitimate means of achieving it.
-innovation: some Americans by-pass the legitimate means of achieving the ‘dream’ and use crime as a ‘quick fix’. Bank robbery, drug dealing for example can result in a person becoming wealthy so long as they don’t get caught.
-retreatism: the goal of the ‘dream’ is abandoned, as is the legitimate means of achieving it. A person may ‘drop out’ of society and become addicted to drugs, for example.
What is a contemporary example regarding Merton’s theory?
-Hatton Garden Safe Deposit Company: 2015an underground safe deposit company was burgled in a raid. The value of goods stolen was totalled around £200 million. This type of crime, although having taken place in London, demonstrates what Merton meant by the way in which innovation in response to anomie can propel a person from ‘rags to riches’ in the way that the American dream encourages.
What is a positive and negative evaluation for Merton’s theory?
-Merton ignores crime that have no financial gain. He fails to make sense of non-utilitarian crimes such as vandalism, graffiti etc… This limits the extent to which Merton’s research can be applied to a full range of crimes.
-Merton’s theory does help to make sense of Britain’s lower crime rates. The British welfare state helps to provide financial assistance to the very poorest. America has no equivalent, explaining why innovation through crime as a means of accessing wealth is something criminals in America find themselves tempted by.
What are functionalist subcultural theories?
-they explore why people fail to share mainstream values and collectively behave in ways that are deviant.
What is Albert Cohen’s theory?
-Cohen agrees with Merton that young, wc boys share the main goals of success- to achieve the ‘American Dream’.
-However, as the effects of cultural deprivation take place, they realise the legitimate means are closed off from them.
-Negative labelling adds to this, resulting in status frustration and a situation where wc boys end up rejecting society’s mainstream goals, and thus replacing them with alternative ones. This is the beginning of delinquent subcultures and gang-related crime, of which the USA has a big problem.
How does Cohen challenged Merton’s theory?
-Cohen challenged Merton for assuming crime is financially motivated. Instead, crime is a means of gaining much desired status that is achieved by the recognition that non-utilitarian crime provides for gang members. Status and respect become substitute goals, providing wc boys in company of others, a means of achieving something. This collective response challenges Merton’s claim that crime is typically something that individuals commit.
What is an evaluation for Cohen’s theory?
-Why don’t all people from wc backgrounds experiencing status frustration respond in criminal ways? Even if Cohen’s research is true, it is unclear why delinquency in gang-contexts is the particular response that some people engage in, whereas the overwhelming majority of people do not.
What is Cloward and Ohlin’s theory?
-Cloward and Ohlin also challenge Merton’s Strain Theory. They argued that although Merton adequately explained deviant behaviour as a response to the legitimate opportunity structure, he didn’t look into the different ways in which people innovate in order to bypass the usual means of achieving success.
-Cloward and Ohlin found that there was different forms that gang-related deviance can take, and how the physical environment gangs find themselves in can influence the crimes that occur.
What are the three types of subcultures/gangs that Cloward and Ohlin found?
-criminal subculture: there are established patterns of crime, and young men are able to learn the ‘tricks of the trade’ from older criminals. This provides an illegitimate opportunity structure to criminal success. Modern examples of these are lucrative drug-dealing gangs.
-conflict subcultures: these usually form in the transition zone of cities, where the absence of social structures means that organised criminal gangs are largely absent. Instead, groups of young people ‘ hang around’, committing pointless acts of violence to gain ‘status’ and ‘respect’.
-retreatist gang: consists of young people getting drunk, taking drugs and ‘hang about’ bored. Similar to Merton’s ‘retreatist’ response to anomie, but instead Cloward and Ohlin provide a group response to this feeling.