Education Flashcards
What external factors create differences in educational achievement for ethnic groups
1) Language of parents
2) Family structures and support
3) Material Deprivation
Language of parents - an external factor causing differences in educational achievement for ethnic groups
Ethnic minority parents are less likely to have adequate language skills. This puts them at a disadvantage when helping children with homework or applying for schools, or dealing with external agencies and teachers. Bowker says a lack of standard English creates a huge barrier to UK education
HOWEVER, The Swann Report suggests that language differences had little impact on educational achievement because most minority ethnic children have similar language skills as native speakers.
Family structures and support - an external factor causing differences in educational achievement for ethnic groups
Dysfunctional family types can be to blame for underachievement of ethnic groups. MURRAY - African - Caribbean loan parenthood is to blame because lack of male role models and single mothers means child isn’t adequately socialised
HALL - Impact of slavery means black culture has lost its language, religion and ancestry. Therefore the black community are much less likely to integrate and assimilate with white middle class groups. - ‘The Culture of Resistance’
HOWEVER, this theory essentially blames the victim for their underachievement.
Material deprivation - an external factor causing differences in educational achievement for ethnic groups
Most ethnic minority groups live in poverty, meaning they suffer from the disadvantages the working class face. E.g. A lack of room in the house, lack of peace and quiet, lack of nutritious diets, etc. 15% of ethnic groups live in over crowded homes. Pakistani and Bangladeshi are 3 times more likely than whites to be in the poorest 1/5 of the population
What internal factors create differences in educational achievement for ethnic groups
1) Labelling
2) Pupil identities
3) Pupil responses
Labelling - an internal factor causing differences in educational achievement for ethnic groups
Racialised expectations: Gilbourn and Youdell say teachers are quick to discipline black pupils over others for similar behaviour. Teachers misinterpret black pupil behaviour and see them as anti - authority.
Pupil identities - an internal factor causing differences in educational achievement for ethnic groups
Archer: teachers often define pupils by stereotypical ethnic identities which often lack the favoured ideal pupil characteristics. It leads to negative labelling. Students who challenge the stereotypes get treated more harshly. Ideal pupil identity - white, heterosexual, middle class, achieving success through meritocracy. Demonized pupil identity - Black/white, culturally deprived, underachiever, unintelligent.
Pupil responses - an internal factor causing differences in educational achievement for ethnic groups
Failed coping strategies - MIRZA: highlights how some pupils aren’t able to develop coping strategies when faced with teacher racism and labelling. Black girls avoided teachers by being selective about who they asked for help. They would also get on with their own work without participating in lessons. This puts them at a disadvantage by restricting their opportunities, therefore causing underachievement.
How can teaching and learning in schools affect educational experiences of minority ethnic groups
The ethnocentric curriculum: Schools occupy this curriculum which focusses on the dominant culture, like white British in the UK. It fails to provide positive role models for ethnic minority groups.
Teacher labelling: Chinese pupils who are quiet, hardworking and passive are socialised in this way. Teachers see their success as ‘wrong’ because they haven’t achieved their success through natural individual ability, meaning they could never legitimately occupy the identity of an ideal pupil. HOWEVER, not all students will fall victim to the self - fulfilling prophecy.
How has globalisation had an influence on educational policies
1) League tables: they compare achievement between different countries, and the UK is showing poor results so there is pressure to improve. (PISA) - a league table that is an international testing programme that compares standards.
2) Growth of internet: allows for new ways to access information and testing. Some schools have policies on home - based learning.
Educational policies that have raised achievement for all and raised standards and improved equality of educational opportunity
1) Parentocracy
2) New labour government policies
3) Conservative liberal democratic policies
4) Formula funding
5) Cultural/ economic capital
6) Policies on ethnicity
How has parentocracy raised standards and improved equality
Publication of exam league table increases parental choice. Power shifts from producers (teachers and schools), to consumers, (parents). Parents are able to look at exam results and see which school suits their child best based on their ability. This encourages competition between schools and so it raises their standards and they have to act like businesses.
HOWEVER: Ball argues that parentocracy is a myth, as not all parents have the ability to take advantage of the education system since they don’t have the cultural capital, (working class parents).
How have new labour government policies raised standards and improved equality
Policies such as educational maintenance allowances (EMAs), which are bursaries given to lower - income students to encourage them to take up post - 16 qualifications. Labour government wanted to reduce inequalities between middle class and working class pupils.
HOWEVER: Labour government contradicted their policies to reduce inequalities for working class pupils as they raised tuition fees which will deter lower income students from going to university.
How have conservative liberal democrat policies raised standards and improved equality
Introducing academies and free schools. Academies able to access funding directly from the government, giving them control over their curriculum. Free schools improved standards by allowing parents and teachers to change things they were unhappy with.
HOWEVER: Free schools only benefit those from highly educated social backgrounds, maintaining social inequality. Free schools also criticised for being divisive and lowering standards.
How has formula funding raised standards and improved equality
The more students a school has, the more money they will get. Therefore popular schools will have more money to spend on highly trained teachers and high quality activities. Less popular schools won’t be able to do so as they’ll have less money, meaning they won’t be able to compete as they have lower standards and won’t be able to compete with their rivals. The strong competition generates higher standards among schools
HOWEVER: Competition - orientated schools usually suffer from segregation among pupils from different social backgrounds.
How has cultural/economic capital raised standards and improved equality
Privileged - skilled choosers are middle class parents who posses cultural and economic capital which allows them to take advantage of the application process and have the money to pay for travel to and from school or even relocate near the school they want their child to go to. Disconnected - local and semi - skilled choosers lack the knowledge and resources which rids their children of opportunities.
HOWEVER: Even though the education market has claimed to increase equality and choice for parents, middle class parents are the only ones who are able to take advantage of the education market, whilst the working class can’t.
How have policies on ethnicity raised standards and improved equality
Multi-cultural education (MCE) aims to promote the achievements of children from ethnic groups by valuing all cultures in the curriculum. Purpose of MCE is to raise the self-esteem of of ethnic pupils which was done in hope to raise their achievement.
HOWEVER: MCE picks out stereotypical features of cultures for the sake of inclusivity and fails to tackle institutional racism.
List sociological contributions to our understanding of the role of education in society
1) Social solidarity (Functionalism)
2) Role allocation (Functionalism)
3) Meritocracy (Functionalism)
4) The correspondence principle (Marxism)
5) The ideological state apparatus (Marxism)
6) The myth of meritocracy (Marxism)
How does the education system provide social solidarity
The education system transmits society’s’ culture (norms and values) from one generation to the next. Through history lessons students are instilled with a sense of shared heritage and community, so it reinforces social solidarity which society needs to function according to Durkheim
HOWEVER: Marxists argue that the education system in a capitalist society transmits ruling class ideology, as opposed to shared values.
How does the education system provide role allocation
Davis and Moore say that when schools assess pupils’ aptitudes and abilities, it helps match students to the job they’re best suited. Also, inequality is necessary to ensure that the most important roles in society go to the most talented people. Higher rewards are offered to those in more skilful jobs, so students compete for them.
How does the education system provide meritocracy
Parsons argues that pupils earn their status through the education system, as in the family it is ascribed to you. E.g. An older son and younger daughter may be given different rights/duties because of differences in age and gender. The education system allows individuals to achieve their status, since their own effort will determine their success. Schools are meritocratic because everyone must surpass the same ‘pass’ mark in exams and they are all judged against the same standards. - Everyone has the same opportunity to prove their ability
HOWEVER: There is plenty of evidence to suggest that equal opportunity in the education system doesn’t exist. For example, achievement is greatly influenced by class background rather than ability.
How does the education system create a correspondence principle
What students learn in school via the hidden curriculum corresponds to what future employers need. E.g. Passive subservience of pupils to teachers - passive subservience of workers to managers. Acceptance of hierarchy in schools - acceptance of hierarchy in the workplace. Motivation created by external rewards in school and at work. E.g. Students put up with the boredom of lessons to get grades at the end, whilst workers put up with exploitation and tedium at work to get wages at the end of the month.
HOWEVER: Some pupils rebel, they don’t simply passively accept authority.
How does the education system provide an ideological state apparatus
School create a false consciousness and ‘controls people’s minds’. It presents capitalist system as just and inevitable through state apparatuses such as the education system. Alternative systems are presented as unrealistic and state institutions encourage pupils to passively accept their future work roles and create a passive subservient workforce. There is no need to use repressive state apparatuses since the ideological state apparatus does its job well enough to avoid rebellion and revolution
HOWEVER: Postmodernists will argue that the education system reproduces diversity, not inequality
How does the education system provide the myth of meritocracy
Schools teach pupils that everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed. People believe that if they fail it is due to their own lack of ability or hard work. However, pupils aren’t taught the truth which is that working class pupils face disadvantages in the education system as a result of their social background. Therefore they will accept lower paid jobs later in life.
HOWEVER: Marxist perspectives are deterministic - not every working class pupil fails via the education system.