Education Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Heaton and Lawson (1996)

A

The Hidden curriculum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the Hidden/Patriarchal curriculum?

A

a form of socialisation where boys and girls are socialised into different gender roles. They see parallels between what happens in school to gender expectations in wider society (the hidden curriculum).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

5 Ways the Hidden curriculum operates

A
  • Through a patriarchal curriculum where lessons and subjects are gender specific despite the national curriculum in place
  • A lack of positive role models
  • Teachers expectations and attitudes
  • Through students, where girls are made to feel uncomfortable in certain spaces (Culley 1986)
  • Through books (Kelly 1987)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Heaton and Lawson Evaluation

A
  • the education system is increasingly resulting in female success and male underperformance. If this is a system designed to ensure men are in the top positions in society and women are marginalised into a domestic role, then it would appear to be failing.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Walby (1999)

A

Triple System Theory of Patriarchy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Triple Systems Theory

A
Walby believes that experiences of ethnicity and class complicate how we think about what it is to be female. Walby argues that to understand the issues women face, we need to understand them from three structures of power and difference 
- patriarchy, racism and capitalism.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Six ways women are exploited

A
  1. The patriarchal mode of production where women’s labour is exploited within the household by men.
  2. Patriarchal relations in paid work where women are segregated and paid less.
  3. Patriarchal relations in the state where the state operates in the interests of men rather than women.
  4. Male violence against women through rape, sexual, emotional and physical assault.
  5. Patriarchal relations in sexuality where women face double standards as their sexuality is viewed differently to men’s.
  6. Patriarchal relations within cultural institutions and the creation of masculine and feminine identities through the media, education and religion.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does Walby’s Triple Systems Theory link to education

A

Focus on the patriarchal relations within cultural institutions and the creation/socialisation of masculine and feminine identities through education.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Osler (2006)

A

Ethnicity, gender, and learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Osler pick up on?

A
  • schools have focused so much on boys, they have diverted attention from not only underachieving girls but from pupils disadvantaged by their class and/or ethnic background.
  • Schools have been set a target to ‘reduce school exclusions among boys and certain ethnic-minorities’. She points out that the current focus on boys’ exclusion (and underachievement) is masking a serious problem of exclusion and underachievement among girls, which is increasing at a faster rate than that of boys
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Osler on girls in school

A

African-Caribbean girls are often hailed as one of education’s success stories. Yet girls classified as African- Caribbean are more vulnerable to disciplinary exclusion than their white female peers. Despite this, mentoring schemes and other support systems are targeting Black boys. Furthermore, girls who are excluded from school are less likely than their male counterparts to access appropriate support or secure
places in pupil referral units or other alternative schemes. Osler sees this as their right to an education being denied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why doesn’t Osler claim herself as a Feminist?

A

her main argument is that we should move away from this ‘gender seesaw’ where schools focus on boys, then girls and then boys again. She reveals one of the problems with schools focusing solely on the group they perceive to be the most disadvantaged. She is able to show how class, gender and ethnicity can intersect and how this complicates the experiences girls have in school. That being said, the way she understands how class, gender and ethnicity intersect shows an element of intersectional feminist influence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Osler Evaluation

A

Useful as she is able to show how class, gender and ethnicity can intersect and how this complicates the experiences girls have in school.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Francis (1998)

A

Gender and Learning

Boy’s impairment on girl’s learning experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was Francis’ overview on education?

A

Despite boys underachieving in schools compared to girls, feminists like Becky Francis (1998) suggest that girls are still underachieving in school because of disruptive boys. Teachers may be so tied up with controlling boys, that girls don’t get the attention they deserve.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What study did Francis conduct?

A

In 2005 Francis carried out a study on ‘the impact of gender constructions on pupil’s learning and educational choices.’

17
Q

What did Francis’ study ‘the impact of gender

constructions on pupil’s learning and educational choices.’ in 2005 entail?

A
  • Observation was used to record classroom interaction and student behaviour during VCSE lessons.
  • She also carried out individual interviews with students.
  • The schools were all mixed-sex comprehensives with a large majority of working-class students. Approximately one third of the sample were from African-Caribbean origin, one third were White and one third from other ethnic groups.
  • The observation was conducted in English lessons (traditionally feminine subject) and Maths (traditionally masculine subject). A
    top set and lower set lesson were observed, so four observed in each school (12 observations in total). Each class had 3 lessons observed (36 observations in total).
18
Q

What did Francis’ study ‘the impact of gender

constructions on pupil’s learning and educational choices.’ in 2005 discover?

A

In terms of power, boys gained status by taking up ‘laddish’ or ‘class clown’ roles. In 8/12 classes observed, boys dominated the classroom interaction by being louder than girls, making greater use of the classroom space, shouting out questions and answers, being disruptive and/or taking up more of the teachers’ attention.
- However, the research also showed how the view of femininity as ‘sensible’ fits more easily with the qualities
required for educational success such as concentration and hard work. Francis perceived that their ambition for a good job and the need to compete with men was motivating them to perform well at school.

19
Q

Francis evaluation

A

A limitation of her classroom observations was an inability to faithfully record all the interaction, due to the sheer noise levels in some of the classes, however this can further proves her point on male disruption in lessons

20
Q

Sue Sharpe (1994)

A

Changing Aspirations

21
Q

What did Sue Sharpe study?

A

the attitudes of working-class girls in London

22
Q

What time periods did Sue Sharpe compare in her study of the attitudes of working-class girls

A

1970s and 1990s

23
Q

What did Sue Sharpe discover about the 70s in her study ?

A

In a 1976 survey, Sue Sharpe discovered that girls’ priorities were ‘love, marriage, husbands and children’ then followed by ‘jobs, careers’ – more or less in that order.

24
Q

What did Sue Sharpe find in the 90s survey

A

When the research was repeated in 1994, she found that their priorities had changed to ‘job, career and being able to support themselves’ above all other priorities.

25
Q

Sharpe Evaluation

A

Such changes have been demonstrated by other researchers such as Becky Francis.

26
Q

Kelly (1987)

A

Gendered Language in textbooks

27
Q

What was Kelly’s main focus ?

A

focused on a particular aspect of the patriarchal curriculum - gendered language in education

28
Q

Kelly Overview

A
  • women were invisible in science textbooks and dependent on men in Children’s books.
  • Teachers reflect patriarchal values when they are speaking about a group of people and tend to use masculine gendered pronouns
29
Q

Kelly Evaluation

A

Education is becoming a more female-dominated field (most teachers are women, an increasing number of managers are women because they are drawn from the available teachers)

30
Q

Culley (1986)

A

School teach girls to accept marginalisation

31
Q

According to Culley, how are girls marginalised in school?

A

Culley found that boys ‘colonise’ or take over spaces.
Examples of this are computer rooms and playgrounds.
Boys tend to play ball games centrally and the girls find themselves pushed to the edges.

32
Q

Culley evaluation

A

it is still clear that there is a glass ceiling and a gender pay gap so the education system might be creating lots of highly-qualified girls, they are still losing out to their male peers when it comes to top jobs and higher incomes. the education system largely normalises this and so even highly-qualified women often accept this as inevitable or normal. At the same time men are socialised to also consider this normal.