Education Flashcards
Heaton and Lawson (1996)
The Hidden curriculum
What is the Hidden/Patriarchal curriculum?
a form of socialisation where boys and girls are socialised into different gender roles. They see parallels between what happens in school to gender expectations in wider society (the hidden curriculum).
5 Ways the Hidden curriculum operates
- Through a patriarchal curriculum where lessons and subjects are gender specific despite the national curriculum in place
- A lack of positive role models
- Teachers expectations and attitudes
- Through students, where girls are made to feel uncomfortable in certain spaces (Culley 1986)
- Through books (Kelly 1987)
Heaton and Lawson Evaluation
- the education system is increasingly resulting in female success and male underperformance. If this is a system designed to ensure men are in the top positions in society and women are marginalised into a domestic role, then it would appear to be failing.
Walby (1999)
Triple System Theory of Patriarchy
Triple Systems Theory
Walby believes that experiences of ethnicity and class complicate how we think about what it is to be female. Walby argues that to understand the issues women face, we need to understand them from three structures of power and difference - patriarchy, racism and capitalism.
Six ways women are exploited
- The patriarchal mode of production where women’s labour is exploited within the household by men.
- Patriarchal relations in paid work where women are segregated and paid less.
- Patriarchal relations in the state where the state operates in the interests of men rather than women.
- Male violence against women through rape, sexual, emotional and physical assault.
- Patriarchal relations in sexuality where women face double standards as their sexuality is viewed differently to men’s.
- Patriarchal relations within cultural institutions and the creation of masculine and feminine identities through the media, education and religion.
How does Walby’s Triple Systems Theory link to education
Focus on the patriarchal relations within cultural institutions and the creation/socialisation of masculine and feminine identities through education.
Osler (2006)
Ethnicity, gender, and learning
What did Osler pick up on?
- schools have focused so much on boys, they have diverted attention from not only underachieving girls but from pupils disadvantaged by their class and/or ethnic background.
- Schools have been set a target to ‘reduce school exclusions among boys and certain ethnic-minorities’. She points out that the current focus on boys’ exclusion (and underachievement) is masking a serious problem of exclusion and underachievement among girls, which is increasing at a faster rate than that of boys
Osler on girls in school
African-Caribbean girls are often hailed as one of education’s success stories. Yet girls classified as African- Caribbean are more vulnerable to disciplinary exclusion than their white female peers. Despite this, mentoring schemes and other support systems are targeting Black boys. Furthermore, girls who are excluded from school are less likely than their male counterparts to access appropriate support or secure
places in pupil referral units or other alternative schemes. Osler sees this as their right to an education being denied.
Why doesn’t Osler claim herself as a Feminist?
her main argument is that we should move away from this ‘gender seesaw’ where schools focus on boys, then girls and then boys again. She reveals one of the problems with schools focusing solely on the group they perceive to be the most disadvantaged. She is able to show how class, gender and ethnicity can intersect and how this complicates the experiences girls have in school. That being said, the way she understands how class, gender and ethnicity intersect shows an element of intersectional feminist influence.
Osler Evaluation
Useful as she is able to show how class, gender and ethnicity can intersect and how this complicates the experiences girls have in school.
Francis (1998)
Gender and Learning
Boy’s impairment on girl’s learning experience
What was Francis’ overview on education?
Despite boys underachieving in schools compared to girls, feminists like Becky Francis (1998) suggest that girls are still underachieving in school because of disruptive boys. Teachers may be so tied up with controlling boys, that girls don’t get the attention they deserve.