EDPNA PRACTICE EXAM Flashcards
To be disability insured for Title II Disability benefits an individual must,
Have worked 5 out of the last 10 years and paid into the system.
At the fourth step of the sequential evaluation process, if a claimant has the residual functional capacity to perform his/her past relevant work, then,
A finding of not being disabled is made, and the analysis stops there at step four.
Yes, in the context of the Social Security disability sequential evaluation process, if at step four it is determined that a claimant has the residual functional capacity (RFC) to perform his past relevant work (PRW), then the claimant is found to be not disabled, and the analysis concludes at that step without proceeding to step five1. The sequential evaluation process is designed to stop at the step where a determination can be made. If the claimant cannot perform PRW, or if there is no past relevant work, then the evaluation proceeds to step five.
A new client contacts you on 5/16/21 about assisting him in filing an appeal. His initial denial notice is date‐stamped 3/1/21, but he indicates that he did not receive the notice until 4/4/21. He kept the envelope in which the notice was mailed, and the postage date was 3/31/21. You:
c. assist him in filing an immediate appeal, requesting that the appeal be considered timely filed since he can prove he did not receive the notice within five days of its date‐stamp.
- An individual is applying for Title II Disability benefits with a 1/1/2013 onset date, who earned 4 quarters of coverage each year in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012, would have the following date last insured for benefits,
December 31, 2017
The Date Last Insured (DLI) is indeed the last day of the quarter in which a claimant meets the insured status for disability or blindness. However, if the individual has a consistent work history and has earned 4 quarters of coverage each year from 2008 to 2012, the DLI would extend beyond the onset date of 1/1/2013 due to the “20/40” test. This test requires 20 quarters of coverage within the last 40 quarters. Since the individual has earned coverage for each year from 2008 to 2012, they would have coverage extending beyond 2013.
The correct DLI would be the last day of the quarter in which the claimant’s insured status expires, which could be December 31, 2017, if they did not earn any more quarters of coverage after 2012. The Social Security Administration uses the individual’s work history to determine the DLI, and the “20/40” test is a common method for this calculation.
Imagine you have a big jar of cookies. To be allowed to take a cookie, you need to have put at least 20 cookies into the jar over the last 10 years. The 10 years is like the jar, and the 20 cookies are like the work you’ve done.
In the Social Security system, the “cookies” are like the work credits you earn when you work and pay Social Security taxes. The “jar” is the last 40 quarters, which is like the last 10 years. You need to have earned at least 20 work credits (cookies) within the last 40 quarters (10 years) to be eligible for disability benefits.
So, if you’ve worked enough to earn those 20 credits in the last 10 years, you can “take a cookie” – which means you can get disability benefits if you need them. If you haven’t put enough cookies in the jar, you can’t take one out, which means you wouldn’t be eligible for the benefits. It’s a way for the Social Security Administration to make sure people have worked recently enough and long enough to qualify for disability benefits
5 full consecutive months will be served as a waiting period on Title II claims during which time you were disabled. Once you have served a 5‐month waiting period on a claim, no 5 month waiting period is required on a subsequent allowed claim as long as that subsequent claim is filed within how many years of the month you again became disabled?
5 years.
For a Social Security Title II claim, once you have served a 5-month waiting period on a claim, you are not required to serve another 5-month waiting period on a subsequent allowed claim as long as that subsequent claim is filed within 5 years of the month you again became disabled. This is because the Social Security Administration recognizes the initial waiting period and allows a grace period for re-filing if your disability recurs. The 5-year timeframe provides a window during which you can file a new claim without needing to wait an additional 5 months, assuming your disability continues or recurs within that period. This policy is designed to streamline the process for individuals who have recurring disabilities and need to reapply for benefits.
The rule regarding not having to serve another 5-month waiting period for Social Security Title II benefits if a subsequent claim is filed within 5 years of the month you again became disabled is found in the Social Security Administration’s rulings. Specifically, it is mentioned in SSR 82-52. This ruling explains that entitlement to benefits can begin after the 5-month waiting period in Title II claims, or with the first full month of disability in a no-waiting period case, as long as the current disability began within 5 years of a previous period of disability ceasing. This provision is designed to help those who have recurring disabilities and need to reapply for benefits.
All of the following information is used in determining the claimant’s alleged onset of disability for the purposes of their disability claim:
a. The date they last worked due to their medical condition.
b. The date their disability prevented them from earning SGA.
c. The date their medical records reflect a severe impairment which interferes with their ability to earn SGA.
d. The date which begins a 30‐day break from earning above SGA after which claimant either had UWA(s) or earnings below SGA.
“UWA(s)” stands for Unsuccessful Work Attempts. In the context of Social Security, a UWA is when someone tries to work but has to stop or reduce their work to below Substantial Gainful Activity (SGA) level within 6 months because of their disability or because special conditions that allowed them to work are removed. Basically, it’s like giving work a try but not being able to keep it up because of a disability. This doesn’t stop someone from being considered disabled for Social Security benefits. If someone has a UWA, it means they tried to work but couldn’t keep it up, and it helps Social Security decide when their disability started.
A homeless 30‐year‐old claimant moves in with his mother and then files an application for SSI disability benefits. His mother, who receives a $4,000.00 per month pension, is allowing him to live with her for free, and paying for his food. The claimant will:
A homeless 30‐year‐old claimant moves in with his mother and then files an application for SSI disability benefits. His mother, who receives a $4,000.00 per month pension, is allowing him to live with her for free, and paying for his food. The claimant will:
a. have his benefit reduced by one‐third, as he receives in‐kind support.
a. have his benefit reduced by one‐third, as he receives in‐kind support.
In the scenario described, the claimant will have his Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefit reduced by one-third because he is receiving in-kind support from his mother. This is because the Social Security Administration (SSA) considers in-kind support and maintenance as income when determining SSI benefit amounts. In-kind support includes food and shelter that someone else provides for you. Since the claimant’s mother is providing both food and shelter, this is counted as in-kind support.
The section of the law that supports this is found in the SSA’s official explanation of how living arrangements affect SSI benefits. Specifically, the SSA’s policy states that if you live in another person’s house and pay less than your fair share of food or housing costs, your SSI benefits may be reduced. This is known as the one-third reduction rule. The SSA uses this rule to ensure that the SSI benefit amount reflects the claimant’s actual need for assistance, taking into account the support they receive from others.
A claimant with severe mental impairments is awarded disability benefits but is deemed incapable of managing his own funds. His sister is appointed as his representative payee, and Social Security has requested that she provide documentation of how she is spending the claimant’s money on his behalf. The sister has failed to respond, and another relative has anonymously advised Social Security that she has a “drinking problem.” SSA will likely:
d. require the sister to come into the local Social Security office to receive the
claimant’s monthly benefit check, so that a determination of her accounting and fitness to continue as the claimant’s representative payee can be made.
require the sister to come into the local Social Security office to receive the
claimant’s monthly benefit check, so that a determination of her accounting and fitness to continue as the claimant’s representative payee can be made.
Into which education category does a person who obtained a 7th grade through 11th grade level of formal education generally fall?
Limited Education.
A person who has obtained a 7th grade through 11th grade level of formal education generally falls into the Limited Education category in the context of Social Security Disability eligibility evaluation. This means they have basic reasoning, arithmetic, and language skills, but not enough to perform most of the more complex job duties needed in semi-skilled or skilled jobs.
The law and regulation section that supports this classification is found in 20 CFR 416.964, which outlines the four categories of education used to evaluate an individual’s education level during the disability determination process. This categorization helps in assessing the vocational factors at step 5 of the sequential evaluation process when determining disability.
A client comes to you asking for representation for their Title II claim for benefits due to chronic heart failure. In reviewing the claimant’s medical records, you see that recent medical evidence shows your client has diastolic failure with left ventricular posterior wall plus septal thickness of 2.7 cm and an enlarged left atrium of 4.3 cm with normal elevated ejection fraction during periods of stability. The record also shows that your client has experienced three episodes of acute congestive heart failure within the last year. Does your client’s chronic heart failure meet a Listing?
No, because their impairment does not meet or medically equal the requirements for both subsections A and B of the appropriate Listing.
No, because their impairment does not meet or medically equal the requirements for both subsections A and B of the appropriate Listing.
The client’s chronic heart failure does not meet a Listing because their impairment does not meet or medically equal the requirements for both subsections A and B of the appropriate Listing. According to Social Security’s Listing 4.02 for chronic heart failure, to meet the listing, an individual must satisfy both part A and part B despite receiving prescribed treatment.
Part A typically requires documented evidence of severe limitation of activities due to symptoms such as angina, syncope, or congestive heart failure. Part B usually requires specific findings on medical tests, such as imaging or exercise testing, that show the heart’s inability to pump enough blood to meet the body’s needs.
In this case, while the client has experienced episodes of acute congestive heart failure and has certain measurements indicating heart issues (like the enlarged left atrium and septal thickness), there is no indication that these findings meet the specific criteria outlined in both subsections A and B of Listing 4.02. Therefore, the client’s condition does not meet the requirements for a Listing based on chronic heart failure.
What is NOT true about the basic definition of disability?
What is NOT true about the basic definition of disability?
a. Has the ability to do any substantial gainful activity.
Note: The claimant must not have the ability to do any substantial gainful activitiy.
What is true about unskilled work?
a. The work needs little or no judgment to do simple duties.
b. The work can be learned on the job in a short period of time.
c. A person does not gain work skills by doing unskilled jobs.
d. All of the above.
Unskilled work refers to jobs that require little or no judgment to perform simple duties, and these tasks can typically be learned on the job in a short period of time. Additionally, while performing unskilled work, a person does not gain the work skills that are usually associated with semi-skilled or skilled jobs. Therefore, the correct answer is d. All of the above. Unskilled work is characterized by its simplicity and lack of requirements for advanced training or specialized skills
Which statement is true about disabled widows’ benefits?
a. The deceased must have been fully insured at the time of their death. (404.335 (a))
- The following would be a situation that requires the use of a fee petition to obtain
representative fee,
d. The representative told the claimant that their fee was pro bono but changed their mind and decided after the case was approved to charge a fee for services.
Under Vocational Considerations, if we find that you can no longer do the kind of work you have done in the past, consideration will then be given to your residual functional capacity, age, education and work experience to determine whether you can do other work. By other work we mean:
Jobs that exist in significant numbers in the national economy.
Res Judicata would apply if,
The claimant misses the appeal deadline and files a new claim with the same onset date as the prior claim with all the same issues and facts being considered.
Res Judicata is a legal principle that prevents a claim from being re-evaluated if it has already been judged on the same issues and facts. In the context of Social Security claims, Res Judicata would apply in the situation described in option b. If a claimant misses the appeal deadline and files a new claim with the same onset date and all the same issues and facts as the prior claim, the Social Security Administration (SSA) can deny the new claim on the basis of Res Judicata. This is because there are no new facts or evidence to warrant a different decision, and the SSA aims to avoid redundant evaluations of the same claim.
The SSA’s Program Operations Manual System (POMS) outlines the application of Res Judicata in GN 03101.160, stating that if a new application is filed with the same issue by the same party and no new facts or evidence, the application may be denied on this basis1. This policy helps maintain the efficiency of the claims process by preventing repetitive reviews of identical claims.