Ed Flashcards
(1) Two most common tectonic settings for volcanos:
- Mid-ocean ridges.
• These divergent plate margins represent the dominant form of volcanism on Earth. The mid-ocean ridge system extends ~65,000 km and produces around 80% of the Earth’s magma output (Crisp, 1984).
• The magma erupted – Mid Ocean Ridge Basalt (MORB) – is remarkably uniform in composition over time and space. This is because the mantle conditions under which the melting occurs are similar everywhere, and because the magma only has to travel through a thin, compositionally uniform crust to erupt, giving it little opportunity to evolve through differentiation or assimilation.
• MORB has a fairly low viscosity on eruption and is relatively poor in volatiles.
• Eruptions also typically take place at a few kilometres’ depth in the oceans.
• Together, these factors mean that mid-ocean ridge volcanism is largely characterized by gentle effusion, with pillow lavas the primary eruptive deposit. - Convergent plate margins.
• The bulk of sub-aerial volcanism occurs at convergent plate margins, above subduction zones.
• Subduction zone volcanism is more varied than mid-ocean ridge volcanism.
• The magma often has to ascend through tens of kilometres of compositionally diverse crust, allowing ample opportunity for it to evolve through differentiation and assimilation; consequently the composition of the erupted magma, the styles of eruption, and the nature of the landforms produced, are all very diverse.
(1) The third tectonic setting
a) Rifting.
• This is cognate with mid-ocean ridge spreading and is, perhaps, not properly identified as truly ‘intra-plate’.
• It may be related to the extension of a mid-ocean ridge onto continental crust, or it may be related to the development of a new spreading centre.
• Examples include the East African Rift, and the Rhine Rift in western Germany.
b) Hot-spot volcanism.
• Most true intra-plate volcanoes are related to a ‘hot spot’ – a temporally persistent mantle melting anomaly which may last for tens of millions of years.
• It is generally, but not universally, accepted that these hot spots occur where hot, upwelling mantle plumes impinge on the base of the lithosphere.
• Hot spots can produce spectacularly voluminous eruptions, creating Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs). These may be basaltic (e.g. the flood basalts of the Deccan Plateau in India) or silicic (e.g. Yellowstone) depending on the maturity of the plume and the lithosphere on which it impinges.
(1) Global trends of volcanic settings
- Largest volcanic system – MOR system – main system of volcanic output
- Only small fraction of magma is extruded, mostly is added to crust to produce new crust
- Continental rift zones have different compositions as they mix with crustal material – MOR have no crust to react with
- Much more production at hotspots due to higher initial temp and decompression melting – Hawaii
- Subduction – dehydration melting – over water = island arc – over land = volcanic arc – larger more complex at volcanic arc due to interactions with crust
(1) Plutonic vs Volcanic
- Plutonic = what is added to crust (intruded)
- Volcanic (erupted) is extruded onto surface
- Much more magma is intruded and is extruded
(1) Volcanos and human populations
- Part of the reason for this association is that volcanoes can induce orogenic precipitation, and their eruptive products weather to produce nutrient rich soils, hence volcanic regions often provide good conditions for agriculture.
- There are also a number of volcanoes near low-lying coastal areas, which are often sites of large urban centres.
- As a result of these factors, nearly 10% of humans live within 100 km of a historically active volcano; nearly 12.5% within 100 km of a volcano that has been active in the Holocene (Small and Naumann, 2001).
(1) Plinian example and its height
Pinatubo, Philippines
June 15th 1991 (composite)
• The eruption was violently explosive, and most of the magma was finely fragmented to produce ash. The ash and gas rose in a lofting plume called a Plinian column, which reached to a height of around 35 km.
• This is well above the tropopause, such that much of the ash and gas was injected into the stratosphere.
• This is very important for atmospheric distribution of the eruptive products for two reasons:
o 1) most of what we consider as weather occurs in the troposphere and there is no rain in the stratosphere to wash out eruption products;
o 2) strong stratospheric winds can disperse eruptive products over a very wide area - jet streams in stratosphere – can carry around world
• Consequently, satellites tracked the ash cloud from the eruption circling the globe several times. The SO2 injected into the stratosphere caused global temperatures to drop by around 0.5°C for the next two years.
(1) Strombolian eruption
Produces mainly gas – almost no lava
(1) Surtseyan eruptions
Surtseyan eruptions are submarine, hydrovolcanic and highly fragmented
(1) Issues of eruption descriptors?
- Firstly, each descriptor can cover a wide range of scales of eruption. The difference between a ‘small’ Plinian eruption, and a ‘large’ Plinian eruption can be very important, particularly for the hazard posed to surrounding communities.
- Secondly, what features are used to classify the eruption? The presence of a lofting, buoyant column of ash and gas could be diagnostic of a Plinian eruption – but how can this be applied to eruptions that were not observed?
- Thirdly, the descriptors may be too vague for some purposes.
(1) Semi-quantitive classification:
qualitative descriptors on a more quantitative footing.
• For example, plotting the degree of fragmentation (percentage of material of ash size) against the area covered by ash. T
• his scheme has the advantage that it can be readily applied to un-observed eruptions from the geological record, as long as there is adequate preservation of deposits. This is essential, because (as we shall see shortly) very large eruptions are rare, and so we must rely on the geological record to study them.
• However, this scheme is far from perfect. For example, it doesn’t capture eruptions that do not produce fragmental material – where would a Pelean eruption plot? Or a unit within a flood basalt province?
(1) Quantitative classification
- The most widely used quantitative classification for eruptions is the Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI).
- This is a discrete scale that uses volume of tephra produced and eruption column height to assign a numerical value between 0 and 8 to an eruption.
- The scheme has been very widely adopted, but it, too, has limitations.
- The chief amongst these is that it only captures explosive eruptions – i.e. those that produce tephra and/or an eruption column. A further limitation is that it assumes a link between eruptions that have a very high flux (hence a tall column) and those that produce abundant tephra.
(1) Magnitude vs Intensity
Magnitude = log10(mass erupted in kg) − 7
Intensity = log10(mass eruption rate in kg/s) + 3
- Both scales are logarithmic, such that the mass of eruptive products from a magnitude 6 eruption is 10x greater than from a magnitude 5 eruption. The magnitude is closely related to VEI – you can approximate VEI by rounding the magnitude to the nearest integer.
- Calculating both the magnitude and the intensity of an eruption allows greater discrimination among different types of eruption. the simple relationship between intensity and magnitude implicit in the VEI does not hold universally. Low magnitude eruptions may still have high intensity if they are very short (e.g. the Halemaumau explosions). On the other hand, low intensity eruptions may still achieve relatively large magnitude if they are very long-lived (e.g. some lava-dome forming eruptions).
(1) Problems with the record of eruptions over time
- Loss of small eruptions in the record through subsequent resurfacing, or erosion.
- These same processes will introduce greater uncertainties on older eruption deposits.
- The uncertainty on eruption age is generally greater for older eruptions.
- The very largest eruptions are very rare, making those data less statistically meaningful.
- It can be hard to distinguish lots of small eruptions from one large eruption, particularly far back in the geological record.
(2) Modelling of surface and atmospheric transport processes is a more mature discipline than modelling of subsurface processes. There are at least three reasons for this:
- 1) eruptive products are the primary agents of hazard;
- 2) transport process are important in many disciplines and have been intensively studied;
- 3) the physical processes that mediate dispersal can be observed directly.
(2) Of these three, the first provides the motivation, the second means that there is much that can be borrowed from other disciplines, and the third allows for effective validation of the accuracy of the models. Developing models of subsurface processes is more challenging for two main reasons:
- 1) the processes cannot be observed directly;
2. 2) magma has extremely complex behaviour that has not yet been fully characterized.
(2) Models of subsurface processes fall into two categories.
- The first includes models that link monitoring signals – seismicity, gas emission, ground deformation, etc. – to physical processes in the subsurface. These models can be extremely useful in supporting the interpretation of monitoring data.
- The second category of models have the grander aim of modelling eruptions themselves, usually focussing on processes that operate in the volcanic conduit (the subvolcanic ‘plumbing system’) that links the shallow reservoir to the vent.
(2) Consider what eruption products can tell us about the eruption that produced them
- Vesical size – bubble size and gas content
- Hydrous minerals = how wet of a magma = how explosive it was – melt inclusions
- Texture – cooling history + vesicles
- Composition = type of eruption = tectonic setting + viscosity
- Type of product + main product
- Mineral diffusion to determine residence time in magma chamber – know how long until an eruption from a recharge event
(2) Coke and mentos
- Surface energy from scratches on mentos – nucleation site – gives activation energy for bubbles to form – coke is above its saturation point before hand and gas is forced out after activation energy reached
- Bubbles have to rise through liquid to burst – when bubbles form there is a volume change – a race for bubbles to rise before time runs out and liquid stops rising
- Relate to explosive eruptions–
- Bubbles don’t have enough time to rise through liquid and burst – bubbles are small. Liquid is rising very fast and liquid is viscous
(2) A simple conceptual physical model of volcanic eruptions
- Silicate melt, containing dissolved volatile species (primarily H2O and CO2) is stored in a crustal magma reservoir.
- The magma becomes supersaturated and bubbles nucleate and grow.
- The growth of bubbles causes the density of the magma to drop, driving ascent of the magma.
- Ascent promotes further growth of bubbles through exsolution and decompression – this positive feedback drives and sustains the eruption.
- Under certain conditions, the growth of the bubbles may become so energetic that it leads to fragmentation of the magma.
(2) Liquid saturation at depth
- At depth liquid is undersaturated
- Something will cause magma to become supersaturated – one cause is rising magma – bubbles will nucleate – crystals forming cause a nucleation site – bubbles decrease density – decompression occurs – bubbles rise faster – run away effect
- Viscosity = magma is more viscous than water – lowest is 10Pa/s – magma can break apart in a brittle way unlike water – if it is stretched too fast (fast rising bubble) it begins to act as a solid and cracks
(2) Volcanoes as syphons
- The pressure in the crustal magma reservoir is largely controlled by the weight of the overlying country rock – we can say that the reservoir is lithostatically pressurized.
- A column of magma will rise up a conduit leading from the reservoir until it reaches a height at which the ‘magmastatic pressure’ at the base of the conduit is in equilibrium with the reservoir pressure.
- The magmastatic pressure is controlled by the density of the magma and the height of the magma column: 𝑃 = 𝜌 𝑔h (neglecting atmospheric pressure). The 𝑚 magma reservoir pressure is controlled by the density of the country rock and the depth of the reservoir:
- Reservoir is lithostatically pressurized – from overburden of rocks
- Height of magma in conduit is balanced by pressure in reservoir
- Density of the magma is greater than the column of rock
- Lavas are full of vesicles – these fill with water so the density is lower