Economics of Discrimination Flashcards
Wages may differ by other factors that may not be associated with productivity differences. What are these factors
- sex
race/ethnicity - age
- sexual orientation
When we discuss discrimination. What are labour market factors
- sex
- race/ethnicity
- age
- sexual orientation
- they do not affect productivity, but may affect wages
When we discuss discrimination. What are non-market factors?
- education, location etc.
- they may be related to market factors and do affect wages
e.g., lower-quality schools for Black people
How do you solve market factors
Policies that make labour market discrimination (sex, race/ethnicity, age, sexual orientation) more costly
How do you solve non-market factors?
Adopt policies to correct non-market discrimination or the causes for the difference in non-market factors (education, location, etc.
What is the equation for Employer Discrimination?
MP’ = MP - d
MP - true marginal product of workers (female or male)
MP’ - perceived marginal product for women
d - Euro value of the marginal disutility to the employer of hiring a female worker instead of a male worker. Measures the employer’s taste of discrimination.
Assume men & women are equally productive.
Discriminatory employers act as if men are more productive than women by including the “cost” to themselves of employing women.
Because wage equals marginal product, the employer will act as if the wage of a female worker is: Wf = W(1+d).
What is d called in the discrimination equation?
d is called the discrimination coefficient.
- what the employer would pay to avoid hiring a female worker
- discrimination is something that must be purchased, and the price is d.
Assuming initially that all employers are identical (they all value discrimination - men over women)
Female workers receive lower wages because employers discount women’s productivity.
Wm = MP while Wf = MP - d (benefit to employers - cost)
Wm = Wf + d > Wf
d = gender wage gap
- women are hurt by discrimination
- the discrimination will persist
- in equilibrium employers will be indifferent between hiring female workers and paying the Wf and hiring male workers and paying them Wm
What happens in markets where employers are identical and have the same d:
- Women are hurt by discrimination
- The discrimination will persist
- In equilibrium employers will be indifferent between hiring female workers and paying them Wf and hiring male workers and paying them Wm
Now suppose that employers differ in the size of d
- d is distributed across employers. Some have high d; for some, d = 0
- Equilibrium value of Wm and Wf in the market - and, thus, d - will be a function of the distribution of d among employers and the number of women seeking a job
In the end, there will be an equilibrium value of d and therefore an equilibrium value of Wm and Wf (Wm = Wf + de) - Call this equilibrium value de
- If de is positive, then Wm>Wf
- If there are enough employers with d=0:
- Wm = Wf
de = 0 - gender wage gap - There is no market discrimination
How does an individual employer behave?
di is the discriminatory coefficient for an individual employers.
- If di<de then the employer will only hire women because Wf(1+di)<Wm (they are profit maximizing, thus they choose the lower: Wf (1 + di).
- If di>de then the employer will only hire men because Wf(1+di)>Wm (they are profit maximizing, thus they choose the lower: Wm).
- If di = de then the employer will hire either men or women.
If de = 0, proportion of men and women hired would be equal.
They’re going to chose what is cheaper.
If it’s cheaper to hire men with d factored in for wage for women, they hire men.
What does employer discrimination theory predict?
Theory predicts most employers will employ only men or only women; very few firms where men & women work together. - same wages but still see segregation.
Is this true?
- There is a fair amount of firm-level segregation by sex
- May be other reasons why men and women tend to work in different firms
- Much less employer segregation by race
Key take away from employer discrimination?
- Firms that employ women will be more profitable - they are using the right amount of workers relative to skills
- Profit of the firm will vary with the owner’s discrimination coefficient
With employer discrimination, how in theory should discrimination be removed from the market?
-> because firms employing female workers are more profitable, they should grow faster and take over the more discriminatory firms
->grow faster and put the other firms out of business
-> buy out the other firms
-> In the end the least discriminatory firms should be the only firms that survive.
Is this what we see?
-> Firms with more women earn higher profits
-> Little differential in firm growth or failure
What do we assume for employee discrimination?
- Assume that men do not like working with women
- Assume that men and women are perfect substitutes in production
If a male worker works with a female worker, he requires a wage premium:
Wm = Wm + d, if he works with women Wm = Wm
Will an employer ever hire both men and women?
No - firms want to maximise profits paying men a higher wage to work with women does not help their profits.
with employee discrimination we should observe perfectly segregated firms - male firms and female firms
What is the observed wage differential in the market with employee discrimination?
The observed wage differential in the market will be 0
Wm = Wf
Employee discrimination between complementary factors - what are we assuming?
production workers and supervisors are complementary factors in production
- Assume men don’t want to be supervised by a women
-> male production workers must get paid more money if they are supervised by female supervisors
- Assume women don’t mind who they are supervised by or who they supervise i.e. male production workers
It is a super simple workforce:
consisting of just production workers + supervisor workers
What will the employer do in the case where men don’t want to be supervised by women?
- Not employee female supervisors supervising male production workers
- female workers will only supervise female workers
- if there are fewer women in the market than men, this will limit the opportunity for female workers
In equilibrium female and male supervisors and female and male workers will be paid the same wage - this reduces the number of supervisor positions compared to if there was no discrimination
What happens in the production and supervisor workers where women are not given supervisor roles as men do not want to be supervised by them?
- there is unequal average pay not unequal wages
average wage of women < average wage of men because fewer women will supervise - even though men and women are paid the same when you’re averaging across two groups and the share (women in supervisor roles compared to men) is different in both groups there is a wage gap
- this could account for why women are more likely to work in lower paying, lower skill occupations
What are the three sources of discrimination
- employee
- employer
- customer/consumer
What do we assume in customer discrimination?
Assume male customers do not like to purchase goods or services from female business owners or female workers
Assume males have lower utility when they buy a good from a female business owner then when they buy the good from a male business owner
-> More likely in retail and service firms
What is the equation for how men behave in consumer discrimination?
Pf = Pm (1 + d)
where Pf is the price of the good from a female owned business,
Pm is the price of the good from a male owned business and d is the discrimination coefficient
What is the result of consumer discrimination?
Fewer women will own businesses
What can customer discrimination lead to?
Women and men having different jobs
- less likely to have female workers work with customers-> they could be working in the back on accounts/ in the stock room