Economics Exam Ideas for Theme 3 Flashcards

1
Q

When was British rail nationalised?

What 2 parts.

A

1993 - national rail infrastructure (state-owned) and train operating companies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are some key statistics in 2016-17 of the rail system in UK?
GDP…
Employment…
Passenger satisfaction with punctuality…
Subsidy…

A
  1. Contributes £10bn per annum of GDP
  2. Employs 216,000 people
  3. 77%
  4. £4.2 billion - government
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What has happened to passenger revenue for the UK rail industry?

A

Grown in ordinary fares, season tickets, and all tickets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Government support fell after financial crisis what year?

A

2008/09 to 2016/17

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why nationalise the railway?
points countering:

Monopoly…
Consumer fares…
Profit flow…
Investment…

A

Rail network is a natural monopoly suited to state control to achieve economies of scale - however might experience DOS / X-inefficiency

Rail fares can be controlled to improve affordability for rail passengers - nearly half of all passengers fares are already regulated?

Profit flow direct to the tax payer rather than to shareholders of private train companies. - lead to a reduction in fares

State can direct investment into the network and borrow more deeply to fund it - however private TOCs have been investing heavily in new rolling stock and facilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Case for private owned/run railways?
points countering:

Competition…
Efficiency…
Regulate fares

A

Competition on lines is more important than who owns the railways - allow more operators - rail system close to full capacity

Private sector firms are more likely to improve dynamic efficiency and avoid x-inefficiencies - however they can increase prices to relent consumer surplus

Possible to regulate more fares on services run by private train operating companies - even with regulation fares have climbed more than 120% since 1995.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The importance of economic efficiency with the railway industry?

Efficiencies…

A
  1. Productive efficiency
    - operating costs
    - capacity utilisation of the system - using up marginal spare capacity
    - ability to benefit from economies of scale / avoiding DOS
  2. Allocative efficiency
    - ticket pricing - do prices reflect marginal costs of producing a service?
    - effects of price discrimination on consumer welfare
    - peak and off-peak pricing
  3. Dynamic efficiency
    - improvements to customer service
    - reliability and safety of trains, frequency of services, customer service, information
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the broader issues in this debate over state vs private?

Competitiveness, tourism...
Expensive...
Market failure...
Control...
Affordability...
A
  1. A successful UK rail industry is needed to sustain and improve the competitiveness / support tourism / regional economic balance
  2. UK rail network is expensive to run. Huge investment needed - unlikely that private sector can provide sufficient funds
  3. Market failure issues are also important. e.g positive externalities
  4. Much of the UK rail industry is already under state control /or direct regulation.
  5. Affordability of rail travel is a major issue although dynamic pricing cuts fares for many segments of the market e.g. student rail cards
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Third degree price discrimination?

Advantages..?

A

Involves charging different prices of people.

  • Allows firms to be able to increase revenue (able to stay in business)
  • Increased investment (dynamic efficiency)
  • lower prices for some
  • manages demand (encourages people to travel at unpopular times)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Third degree price discrimination disadvantages?

A
  1. Higher prices for some (allocatively inefficient)
  2. Decline in consumer surplus- increased inequality
  3. Potentially unfair (those paying higher prices may not be representable of what the inelastic demand group are - increased poverty)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly