Economics Exam Ideas for Theme 3 Flashcards
When was British rail nationalised?
What 2 parts.
1993 - national rail infrastructure (state-owned) and train operating companies
What are some key statistics in 2016-17 of the rail system in UK?
GDP…
Employment…
Passenger satisfaction with punctuality…
Subsidy…
- Contributes £10bn per annum of GDP
- Employs 216,000 people
- 77%
- £4.2 billion - government
What has happened to passenger revenue for the UK rail industry?
Grown in ordinary fares, season tickets, and all tickets
Government support fell after financial crisis what year?
2008/09 to 2016/17
Why nationalise the railway?
points countering:
Monopoly…
Consumer fares…
Profit flow…
Investment…
Rail network is a natural monopoly suited to state control to achieve economies of scale - however might experience DOS / X-inefficiency
Rail fares can be controlled to improve affordability for rail passengers - nearly half of all passengers fares are already regulated?
Profit flow direct to the tax payer rather than to shareholders of private train companies. - lead to a reduction in fares
State can direct investment into the network and borrow more deeply to fund it - however private TOCs have been investing heavily in new rolling stock and facilities
Case for private owned/run railways?
points countering:
Competition…
Efficiency…
Regulate fares
Competition on lines is more important than who owns the railways - allow more operators - rail system close to full capacity
Private sector firms are more likely to improve dynamic efficiency and avoid x-inefficiencies - however they can increase prices to relent consumer surplus
Possible to regulate more fares on services run by private train operating companies - even with regulation fares have climbed more than 120% since 1995.
The importance of economic efficiency with the railway industry?
Efficiencies…
- Productive efficiency
- operating costs
- capacity utilisation of the system - using up marginal spare capacity
- ability to benefit from economies of scale / avoiding DOS - Allocative efficiency
- ticket pricing - do prices reflect marginal costs of producing a service?
- effects of price discrimination on consumer welfare
- peak and off-peak pricing - Dynamic efficiency
- improvements to customer service
- reliability and safety of trains, frequency of services, customer service, information
What are the broader issues in this debate over state vs private?
Competitiveness, tourism... Expensive... Market failure... Control... Affordability...
- A successful UK rail industry is needed to sustain and improve the competitiveness / support tourism / regional economic balance
- UK rail network is expensive to run. Huge investment needed - unlikely that private sector can provide sufficient funds
- Market failure issues are also important. e.g positive externalities
- Much of the UK rail industry is already under state control /or direct regulation.
- Affordability of rail travel is a major issue although dynamic pricing cuts fares for many segments of the market e.g. student rail cards
Third degree price discrimination?
Advantages..?
Involves charging different prices of people.
- Allows firms to be able to increase revenue (able to stay in business)
- Increased investment (dynamic efficiency)
- lower prices for some
- manages demand (encourages people to travel at unpopular times)
Third degree price discrimination disadvantages?
- Higher prices for some (allocatively inefficient)
- Decline in consumer surplus- increased inequality
- Potentially unfair (those paying higher prices may not be representable of what the inelastic demand group are - increased poverty)