Economics Flashcards
Economics
Economics is the study of how individuals and societies choose to allocate scarce resources, why they choose to allocate them that way, and the consequences of those decisions.
Scarcity
is sometimes considered the basic problem of economics. Resources are scarce because we live in a world in which humans’ wants are infinite but the land, labor, and capital required to satisfy those wants are limited. This conflict between society’s unlimited wants and our limited resources means choices must be made when deciding how to allocate scarce resources.
Factors of production
also called the factors of production; these are the land (natural resources such as minerals and oil), labor (work contributed by humans), capital (tools, equipment, and facilities), and entrepreneurship (the capacity to organize, develop, and manage a business) that individuals and businesses use in the production of goods and services.
agent
some entity making a decision; this can be an individual, a household, a business, a city, or even the government of a country.
incentives
rewards or punishments associated with a possible action; agents make decisions based on incentives.
rational decision making
an agent is “rational” if they use all available information to choose an action that makes them as well off as possible; economic models assume that agents are rational.
positive analysis
analytical thinking about objective facts and cause-and-effect relationships that are testable, such as how much of a good will be sold when a price changes.
normative analysis
unlike positive analysis, normative analysis is subjective thinking about what we should value or a course of action that should be taken, such as the importance of environmental factors and the approach to managing them.
microeconomics
the study of the interactions of buyers and sellers in the markets for particular goods and services
macroeconomics
the study of aggregates and the overall commercial output and health of nations; includes the analysis of factors such as unemployment, inflation, economic growth and interest rates.
economic aggregates
measures such as the unemployment rate, rate of inflation, and national output that summarize all markets in an economy, rather than individual markets; economic aggregates are frequently used as measures of the economic performance of an economy.
capital
When people use the word capital in everyday conversation, many people are referring to money or “financial capital.” In economics, capital is defined as the already-produced goods (tools, machinery, equipment, and physical infrastructure) that are used in the production of other goods or services. A robot on a car factory floor is defined as capital in economics; money you borrow to start your own business is not. The financial value of assets that raise revenue (the production that works so you don’t have to, you do nothing but own).
Production possibility curve
The curve created when I plot out how many berries I can get if I spend all my time and get 5 rabbits (0), how many I can get if I spend the amount of time it takes to get 4 rabbits and use the rest for berries (100). Etc. (also called a production possibilities frontier) a graphical model that represents all of the different combinations of two goods that can be produced; the PPC captures scarcity of resources and opportunity costs.
Production possibility frontier
Everything on the production possibility curve and down is possible. The frontier is optimal. Beyond the frontier is impossible.
(implicit) Opportunity cost
The value of the best (non-monetary) option lost when making a decision. The amount of berries I give up by trying to get one more rabbit. the value of the next best alternative to any decision you make; for example, if Abby can spend her time either watching videos or studying, the opportunity cost of an hour watching videos is the hour of studying she gives up to do that.
Increasing opportunity cost
If I don’t kill any rabbits, I can pick 300 berries per day. If I kill one rabbit, my opportunity cost is only 20 berries because that first rabbit is slow and close. If I want a second rabbit though, I will have to give up an additional 40 berries. My opportunity costs are increasing because the rabbits lake longer and longer to get. The graph bows out from the origin.
Decreasing opportunity cost.
The curve is concave to the origin. I am getting better and better at catching rabbits, so I give up less and less berries for each one.
Constant opportunity cost.
Every additional rabbit I catch, I give up the same amount of berries. Straight line on a graph.
Efficient
When the production level is right on the production possibility frontier. the full employment of resources in production; efficient combinations of output will always be on the PPC.
Growth
When you attain a point that is impossible on the PPC as it stands originally through obtaining more land, capital, labor, better technology, better ways of combining all of the above.
Inefficiency
the underemployment of any of the four economic resources (land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurial ability); inefficient combinations of production are represented using a PPC as points on the interior of the PPC.
Contraction
a decrease in output that occurs due to a lack of resources that used to be available, not just an inefficient use of them, but a reduction in everything that made the PPC possible. In a graphical model of the PPC, a contraction is represented by moving to a point that is further away from, and on the interior of, the PPC.
Productivity
(also called technology) the ability to combine economic resources; an increase in productivity causes economic growth even if economic resources have not changed, which would be represented by a shift out of the PPC.
Comparative advantage
When your opportunity cost for producing one plate is only 1/3 of a cup compared to your competitor who’s opportunity cost for producing one plate is 3 cups, you have a comparative advantage in plate production. It doesn’t mean you actually produce more plates (absolute advantage), it is just that you have the capacity to give up less cups than your competitor when you do produce plates.
Specialization
If you specialize in your area of comparative advantage and focus only on making plates, you can make 30 plates every day, but you won’t be getting any cups. If you wanted one cup, you’d have to give up 3 plates. But your competitor has a comparative advantage in cups. If he specializes only in making cups, he can make 30 per day, but he won’t have any plates. If he wanted just one plate, he’d have to give up 3 cups.
Gains of trade
The ability of two agents to increase their consumption possibilities by specializing in the good in which they have comparative advantage and trading for a good in which they do not have comparative advantage
If you make 30 plates a day if you don’t spend any time on cups and you trade at a rate of one plate per one cup with someone who can make 30 cups per day if they don’t spend any time on plates, then your combined efforts will be mutually beneficial since normally, without your trade partner, the cup would cost you 3 times more and your plate would cost them three times more. This can boost you to a new PCC in combination with the partner previously unattainable.
For example, because it has an abundance of maple trees, Canada can produce maple syrup at a very low opportunity cost in relation to avocados, a fruit for which its climate is less suited.
Mexico, on the other hand, with its ample sunshine and warm climate. can grow avocados at a much lower opportunity cost in terms of maple syrup given up than Canada.
Equilibrium
a state in which all economic forces (such as supply and demand) are totally balanced.
● In the state of equilibrium, benefits would be maximized for both consumers and producers (I am paying exactly what I want to pay for things and I am receiving the prices for my goods that I am asking for).
● In Smith’s theory, there is little room for government involvement in the management of the economy.
● Ex. $3.00 for a cup of coffee at a coffee shop. Smith would characterize this as the invisible hand at work. The coffee is worth more to you, the consumer, than those 3 dollars, and the owner of the shop, the producer, valued your 3 dollars (way) more than the cup of coffee. You’re both getting something out of this deal.
Free Market Economy
● Adam Smith advocated for what we today call a free market economy. A free market economy is one in which Individuals can freely pursue their own benefit through being both a consumer and a worker. Smith believed that economic benefits in a society would spread out to everyone. For example, when a consumer purchases something, it helps a producer, who in turn might hire another worker.
Absolute advantage
Given the same amount of inputs as a competitor, you are able to produce more of a given product than that competitor. But even if you have an absolute advantage in both plates and cups over a competitor, it is still better for you to specialize in what you have a comparative advantage in (cups) and trade with someone who has a comparative advantage in plates. Both of you will be able to attain the previously unattainable as long as you trade at a rate that is less than both of your opportunity costs.
diminishing marginal utility
- Another way to think of marginal benefit is to consider the satisfaction that a consumer gets from each subsequent addition. One ring would make the consumer very happy, while a second ring would still make her happy, just not as much. The lessening of appeal for additional consumption is known as diminishing marginal utility
Marginal benefit
I just rented a DVD and I don’t really have time to watch 2, but if the price is below a certain point for the second one, I’ll rent a second one. That point is the marginal benefit)
Marginal benefits are the maximum amount a consumer will pay for an additional good or service.
- The marginal benefit generally decreases as consumption increases
- Marginal benefit usually declines as a consumer decides to consume more and more of a single good.
Marginal cost
(grading the last few papers is way faster than the first few)
- The marginal cost of production is the change in cost that comes from making more of something
- The purpose of analyzing marginal cost is to determine at what point an organization can achieve economies of scale
- Producers consider marginal cost which is the small but measurable change in the expense to the business if they produce one additional unit.
- The workers learn how to move from one task to the next quickly, and the factory can produce more shoes per hour. As more footwear is made in the same specified period, the cost of the factory is further distributed over more shoes, and their cost per unit falls. Also, the cost of materials could go down, as well, as more shoes are made and the materials are purchased in bulk, decreasing the marginal cost
Economies of Scale
If a company has captured economies of scale, the cost to produce a product declines as the company produces more and more of it. When your factory gets to the point that increasing production does not require a corresponding increase in cost, meaning, assuming you keep your prices the same, your profits begin to increase exponentially since every new item is produced at a cost lower than the previous item. Adam Smith said this will best happen through division of labor so that each worker becomes more and more specialized in what he does, more and more efficient. Producing more but getting paid the same, or even getting paid more, but not so much more as to produce diseconomies of scale.
Explicit opportunity cost
Explicit opportunity costs are often the easier of the two to calculate, because these are costs that involve the company spending money. A firm may have a million dollars available but is faced with the opportunity to increase advertising or pay down debt. Both cost a million dollars, but one would probably have greater utility for the firm than the other. If the firm needs to sell more goods, they would likely choose to increase advertising. Thus, the explicit opportunity cost is the amount that they could have spent paying down debt