Economics Flashcards
2.1 Currency Exchange Rates: Understanding Equilibrium Value
– calculate and interpret the bid–offer spread on a spot or forward currency quotation and describe the factors that affect the bid–offer spread
– identify a triangular arbitrage opportunity and calculate its profit, given the bid–offer quotations for three currencies
– explain spot and forward rates and calculate the forward premium/discount for a given currency
– calculate the mark-to-market value of a forward contract
– explain international parity conditions (covered and uncovered interest rate parity, forward rate parity, purchasing power parity, and the international Fisher effect)
– describe relations among the international parity conditions
– evaluate the use of the current spot rate, the forward rate, purchasing power parity, and uncovered interest parity to forecast future spot exchange rates
– explain approaches to assessing the long-run fair value of an exchange rate
– describe the carry trade and its relation to uncovered interest rate parity and calculate the profit from a carry trade
– explain how flows in the balance of payment accounts affect currency exchange rates
– explain the potential effects of monetary and fiscal policy on exchange rates
– describe objectives of central bank or government intervention and capital controls and describe the effectiveness of intervention and capital controls
– describe warning signs of a currency crisis
Notation Conventions: In the CFA curriculum, foreign exchange rates are quoted in price/base terms. These quotes indicate the number of units of the price currency that must be exchanged for one unit of the base currency.
For example, in a USD/EUR quote, USD is the price currency and EUR is the base currency. A quote of USD/EUR 1.25 should be interpreted as “One euro buys 1.25 US dollars.”
In the FX spot market, trades typically settle in two days, known as T+2 settlement. Participants are provided with both bid and offer prices:
1- Bid rate: The rate at which the counterparty (e.g., a dealer or market maker) is willing to buy the base currency. This is the rate you, as a trader, can sell the base currency to the counterparty.
2- Offer (or ask) rate: The rate at which the counterparty is willing to sell the base currency. This is the rate you, as a trader, can buy the base currency from the counterparty.
The offer price is always higher than the bid price, providing compensation to the counterparty offering the quote. The party requesting the quote has the flexibility to transact at either the bid or the offer price provided by the dealer.
FX quotes are typically expressed to four decimal places, with the fourth decimal place referred to as a “pip.” For example, if the USD/EUR rate increases from 1.2000 to 1.2005, we can say that it has gone up by 5 pips.
Bid-offer spreads are usually smaller in the interbank market.
The size of the bid-offer spread for a currency pair is influenced by several factors:
1- Interbank Market Spread:
– Highly liquid pairs like USD/EUR have lower spreads due to high liquidity, while less commonly traded pairs have higher spreads due to lower liquidity.
2- Time of Day:
– Liquidity is highest when the London and New York markets overlap.
– Liquidity is lowest in the late afternoon (New York time) after London closes and before Tokyo opens.
3- Market Volatility:
– Events such as geopolitical tensions or market crashes increase spreads due to heightened risk.
4- Size of the Transaction:
– Larger transactions often face wider spreads because they are harder for dealers to offset.
5- Dealer-Client Relationship:
– Dealers may lower spreads for clients to secure additional business.
– Clients with poor credit may face wider spreads due to increased risk.
Two arbitrage constraints influence the bid-offer quotes provided by dealers in the interbank FX market:
1- Direct Bid-Offer Constraint:
– Dealer bid ≤ Interbank offer
– Dealer offer ≥ Interbank bid
If this condition is not met, dealers could exploit the opportunity by buying from the cheaper source (interbank) and selling to the more expensive source (clients).
2- Cross-Rate Constraint:
– Dealer cross-rate bid < Interbank implied cross-rate offer
– Dealer cross-rate offer > Interbank implied cross-rate bid
This ensures that cross-rate arbitrage opportunities are eliminated by aligning dealer and interbank implied rates.
JPY/EURoffer
Explanation and Triangular Arbitrage:
1. Compute the rate to sell JPY and buy EUR:
The objective is to calculate the JPY/EUR offer rate using the interbank quotes provided:
EUR/USD: 0.7325 / 0.7327 (bid/offer)
JPY/USD: 76.64 / 76.66 (bid/offer)
The JPY/EUR offer rate is calculated as:
(JPY/USDoffer) × (USD/EURoffer )
JPY/EURoffer=(JPY/USDoffer)×(USD/EURoffer)
Since the USD/EUR offer is the inverse of the EUR/USD bid, calculate:
USD/EURoffer
= 1 / EUR/USDbid = 1 / 0.7325 = 1.3654
USD/EURoffer=1/EUR/USDbid=1/0.7325=1.3654
Substitute the values:
JPY/EURoffer
= 76.66 × 1.3654 = 104.65
JPY/EURoffer=76.66×1.3654=104.65
This is the interbank offer rate to sell JPY and buy EUR.
- Dealer Quote and Arbitrage Opportunity:
The dealer quotes a JPY/EUR bid-offer rate of 104.67 / 104.69.
– The interbank JPY/EUR offer rate is calculated as 104.65 (from Step 1).
– The dealer’s bid rate is 104.67, which is higher than the interbank offer rate, creating an arbitrage opportunity.
To execute the arbitrage:
1- Buy EUR in the interbank market at 104.65 JPY/EUR (interbank offer rate).
2- Sell EUR to the dealer at 104.67 JPY/EUR (dealer bid rate).
Profit per unit of EUR:
Profit = Dealerbid − InterbankofferProfit
= 104.67 − 104.65 = 0.02 JPYperEUR.
Conclusion:
By purchasing EUR for 104.65 JPY in the interbank market and selling it to the dealer for 104.67 JPY, a triangular arbitrage generates a profit of 0.02 JPY per EUR traded.
1- Bid rate: The rate at which the counterparty (e.g., a dealer or market maker) is willing to buy the base currency. This is the rate you, as a trader, can sell the base currency to the counterparty.
2- Offer (or ask) rate: The rate at which the counterparty is willing to sell the base currency. This is the rate you, as a trader, can buy the base currency from the counterparty.
Example with JPY/EUR (104.67 / 104.69):
Bid (104.67): You can sell EUR and receive JPY at this rate.
Offer (104.69): You can buy EUR and pay JPY at this rate.
Therefore, buying it for less than the dealer is willing to pay for.
Forward exchange rates are typically quoted in points, which represent the difference between the forward exchange rate and the spot exchange rate.
1- Points Calculation:
– Points are scaled based on the number of decimal places in the spot quote.
– Example:
— If a rate is quoted to four decimal places, 51 forward points is equal to 51 / 10 000 = 0.0051.
— If a rate is quoted to two decimal places, 7 forward points is equal to 7 / 100 = 0.07.
2- Customized Contracts in the FX Market:
– The FX market operates over-the-counter (OTC), allowing participants to customize contracts.
– Non-standard maturities may require dealers to use linear interpolation to determine rates.
– Example: A rate for a 3.5-month contract can be calculated as the midpoint between the 3-month and 4-month rates.
Ex:
Spot (USD/EUR): 1.0766 / 1.0768
Three months: -15.3 / -14.7
Buy EUR forward against the USD in three months, what would be the rate? :
1.0768 + (-14.7 / 10 000) = 1.07533
The value of a forward contract is zero at inception but can be positive or negative at later dates. A forward contract is closed by entering into an offsetting forward contract. When calculating the mark-to-market value, discounting is required to the settlement date.
Notation Conventions: In the CFA curriculum, foreign exchange rates are quoted in price/base terms. These quotes indicate the number of units of the price currency that must be exchanged for one unit of the base currency.
For example, in a USD/EUR quote, USD is the price currency and EUR is the base currency. A quote of USD/EUR 1.25 should be interpreted as “One euro buys 1.25 US dollars.”
Forward Premium : F f/d > S f/d
Forward Discount : F f/d < S f/d
Exchange rate movements are influenced by several factors:
1- Long Run versus Short Run:
– Long-term equilibrium values act as anchors for exchange rates, but they are generally poor predictors of short-term fluctuations.
2- Expected versus Unexpected Changes:
– In efficient markets, prices and rates reflect current consensus expectations.
– Exchange rates are most influenced by unexpected new information; expected changes have minimal impact.
3- Relative Movements:
– Exchange rates are driven by relative movements among countries rather than absolute changes in isolation.
! We must accept that no single model can accurately forecast exchange rates in all circumstances. A model that works well for a given currency pair over one period may not be a reliable predictor for other pairs
International Parity Conditions
Explain relationships between economic variables across countries in an ideal world. Key parity conditions include:
1- Covered Interest Rate Parity
2- Uncovered Interest Rate Parity
3- Forward Rate Parity
4- Purchasing Power Parity
5- International Fisher Effect
These conditions provide expectations for:
– Expected inflation differentials
– Interest rate differentials
– Forward exchange rates
– Current spot exchange rates
– Expected future spot exchange rates
However, real-world factors like transaction costs and imperfect information ensure that these conditions do not always hold.
Covered Interest Rate Parity : Ensures that two risk-free investment options for an investor with one unit of domestic currency provide the same returns, preventing arbitrage opportunities.
The two options are:
1- Invest domestically at the domestic risk-free rate.
2- Invest abroad:
– Convert the domestic currency to the foreign currency.
– Invest at the foreign risk-free rate.
– Use a forward contract to lock in the exchange rate for converting the proceeds back into domestic currency.
In practice, covered interest rate parity generally holds, as arbitrageurs quickly eliminate price discrepancies in efficient markets.
Assumptions:
– CIRP holds under the following conditions:
No transaction costs in the market.
Domestic and foreign money market instruments are equivalent in terms of:
– Liquidity.
– Maturity.
– Default risk.
Uncovered Interest Rate Parity (UIP) suggests that the following two options should provide the same expected return:
1- Invest at the domestic risk-free rate.
2- Convert to the foreign currency, invest at the foreign risk-free rate, and later convert back to the domestic currency at the prevailing spot rate.
Unlike covered interest rate parity, no forward contract is used to lock in a conversion rate in Option 2, making it an unhedged investment. A risk-neutral investor would be indifferent between the two options if UIP holds.
Key Implication of UIP:
– Any difference between the foreign and domestic risk-free rates should be offset by expected changes in the exchange rate:
Foreign risk-free rate - Domestic risk-free rate = Expected percentage change in the exchange rate.
– If the foreign risk-free rate is higher than the domestic rate, the foreign currency is expected to depreciate relative to the domestic currency (i.e., the future spot exchange rate will increase).
Practical Considerations:
– If UIP holds, the current forward exchange rate would be an unbiased predictor of the future spot rate.
– However, UIP tends to hold better over long-term horizons and is less reliable for predicting exchange rates over short- and medium-term periods.
– This allows investors to potentially profit by overweighting higher-yielding currencies.
Uncovered Interest Rate Parity (UIP) :
if - id = % Change in Se f/d
Se f/d : Spot expected foreign-domestic rate
That is, if the foreign risk-free rate is higher, the foreign currency will weaken relative to the domestic currency (i.e., the S f/d rate will increase).
Forward Rate Parity:
Definition:
– Forward rate parity states that forward exchange rates are unbiased predictors of future spot exchange rates.
– This means that while forward rates may sometimes overestimate or underestimate the future spot rate, they should, on average, match the future spot rate over time.
Implications:
– If both covered and uncovered interest rate parity hold, then forward rates would be accurate predictors of future spot rates.
– This would align with the relationship between forward rates, spot rates, interest rate differentials, and expected spot rate changes.
Practical Observations:
– Forward contracts ensure covered interest rate parity generally holds, eliminating arbitrage opportunities.
– However, uncovered interest rate parity rarely holds due to the lack of an arbitrage mechanism.
– As a result, forward rates are generally poor predictors of future spot rates, especially in the short run.
Forward Rate parity :
F f/d = Se f/d
Forward rates are generally poor predictors of future spot rates, at least in the short run.
Purchasing power parity (PPP) is based on the law of one price, which states that identical goods should have the same price. There are several versions of PPP.
Purchasing Power Parity (PPP):
1- Absolute Version of PPP:
– States that the equilibrium exchange rate is based on the ratio of prices in one country relative to another:
Exchange rate = Price level of foreign country / Price level of domestic country.
– Assumes frictionless markets with no transaction costs or trade barriers.
– In reality, factors such as costs and the inability to trade certain goods often prevent absolute PPP from holding.
2- Relative Version of PPP:
– Recognizes that changes in exchange rates are driven by changes in price levels.
– The percentage change in an exchange rate is approximately equal to the difference between the foreign and domestic inflation rates:
% Change in exchange rate ≈ Foreign inflation rate - Domestic inflation rate.
– If the foreign country’s inflation rate is higher, its currency will weaken relative to the domestic currency.
3- Ex Ante Version of PPP:
– Focuses on expected changes in exchange rates and inflation:
Expected % Change in exchange rate ≈ Expected foreign inflation rate - Expected domestic inflation rate.
– Countries with persistently high inflation can expect their currencies to depreciate over time.
4- Practical Observations:
– Real exchange rates tend to mean-revert over the long run, driving nominal exchange rates toward PPP equilibrium values.
– However, significant deviations from PPP can occur in the short run due to market inefficiencies or other factors.
Absolute : S f/d = ( Pf / Pd ) –> [Prices foreign and domestic]
Relative : % Change in S f/d = approx = Foreign Inflation - Domestic Inflation
Ex-ante : % Change in Se f/d = approx = Expected Foreign Inflation - Expected Domestic Inflation
Combining Interest Rates, Inflation, and Exchange Rates (Fisher Effect and Parity Conditions):
1- Fisher Effect:
– The nominal interest rate is composed of the real interest rate and expected inflation:
Nominal interest rate = Real interest rate + Expected inflation.
2- Real Domestic-Foreign Interest Rate Differential:
– The nominal interest rate differential can be adjusted for expected inflation to determine the real interest rate differential:
Real interest rate differential = Nominal interest rate differential - Inflation rate differential.
3- Real Interest Rate Parity:
– If uncovered interest rate parity and ex ante purchasing power parity (PPP) hold, the real interest rate parity condition applies:
Real interest rate differential = 0.
– Under this condition, the real yield spread between domestic and foreign countries is zero.
4- International Fisher Effect:
– If real interest rate parity holds, the international Fisher effect will also hold:
Nominal interest rate differential = Expected inflation rate differential.
5- Practical Limitations:
– Both the international Fisher effect and real interest rate parity assume currency risk is uniform across all countries.
– This assumption does not hold in practice, especially for emerging markets, which have higher currency risk. Adjustments must be made to reflect these differences.
i = r + E[Inflation]
if - id = (rf - rd) + (E[Foreign Inflation] - E[Domestic Inflation] )
rf - rd = (if - id) - (E[Foreign Inflation] - E[Domestic Inflation] )
If uncovered interest rate parity and ex ante PPP hold;
rf - rd = % Change Se f/d - % Change Se f/d = 0
Thus,
if - id = (E[Foreign Inflation] - E[Domestic Inflation] )
Inflation and Currency Depreciation:
It’s true that higher inflation in a country tends to weaken its currency in the long run. This happens because:
1- Higher inflation reduces the purchasing power of the currency.
2- Export goods become less competitive, and investors might seek stronger currencies elsewhere.
However, in this example, purchasing power parity (PPP) explains how exchange rate movements offset inflation differentials to maintain parity between countries.
Why Does Currency Depreciation Offset Inflation?
When inflation in Mexico (5%) is higher than in Canada (3%):
1- PPP suggests that the exchange rate should adjust.
The Mexican peso (MXN) depreciates relative to the Canadian dollar (CAD).
This depreciation reflects the inflation differential of 2%.
2- Depreciation “equalizes” the inflation effect:
Although Mexican goods are more expensive domestically due to inflation, the weaker peso makes them cheaper for foreigners (like Canadians) in relative terms.
This depreciation restores the balance in purchasing power between the two currencies, offsetting the inflation gap.
Inflation weakens a currency domestically, but depreciation in the foreign exchange market compensates for this weakness internationally by adjusting the exchange rate. This ensures that goods and services remain comparable across countries, consistent with PPP.
Parity Conditions and Their Linkages
1- Covered Interest Rate Parity (CIRP):
– States that the nominal interest rate spread between two countries equals the percentage forward premium or discount of the exchange rate.
– This relationship holds because of arbitrage opportunities using forward contracts.
2- Uncovered Interest Rate Parity (UIP):
– States that the nominal interest rate spread equals, on average, the expected percentage appreciation or depreciation of the spot exchange rate.
– This is an unhedged condition and relies on expectations about future spot rates.
3- Link Between CIRP and UIP:
– If both covered and uncovered interest rate parity hold, the forward exchange rate would act as an unbiased estimate of the future spot exchange rate.
Ex Ante PPP and the Fisher Effect
1- Ex Ante Purchasing Power Parity (PPP):
– States that the expected change in a spot exchange rate equals the expected difference between domestic and foreign inflation rates.
– This focuses on the inflation differential as a driver of currency value changes.
2- Fisher Effect:
– States that the nominal yield spread (difference in interest rates between two countries) equals the expected difference in inflation rates between those countries.
3- Link Between Ex Ante PPP and Fisher Effect:
– If both conditions hold, the expected change in the spot exchange rate would equal the nominal yield spread.
– This means that inflation differences and interest rate differences both align to explain exchange rate movements.
Implications if All Key Parity Conditions Hold
If all key parity conditions (covered interest rate parity, uncovered interest rate parity, ex ante PPP, and the Fisher effect) hold, then:
1- Expected changes in the spot exchange rate would equal:
– The forward premium or discount (%).
– The nominal yield spread between countries.
– The difference between expected national inflation rates.
2- Implication for Investors:
– If these conditions held perfectly, there would be no consistent arbitrage opportunities or profits to be earned from currency movements.
– Exchange rates would adjust fully to reflect differences in inflation, interest rates, and forward rates, leaving no mispricings to exploit.
Yes, in essence, if ex-ante PPP and the Fisher effect both hold, they together imply uncovered interest rate parity (UIP). Here’s why:
1- Ex-Ante PPP:
– The expected change in the spot exchange rate equals the expected inflation rate differential between two countries:
%ΔS ≈ πf - πd
2- Fisher Effect:
– The nominal yield spread between two countries equals the expected inflation rate differential:
if - id ≈ πf - πd
3- Uncovered Interest Rate Parity (UIP):
– UIP states that the nominal interest rate spread equals the expected change in the spot exchange rate:
if - id ≈ %ΔS
Linkage:
When ex-ante PPP and the Fisher effect both hold, the inflation rate differential drives both the expected change in the spot exchange rate and the nominal yield spread.
This alignment ensures that the nominal interest rate spread (from Fisher) is equal to the expected change in the exchange rate (from UIP).
Assumption of Uncovered Interest Rate Parity (UIP):
– Key Relationship:
In a country with a higher interest rate, its currency is expected to depreciate.
This depreciation offsets the higher returns from the higher interest rate, ensuring no excess profits can be earned.
– Implications:
If UIP holds, there is no incentive to shift capital from one country to another simply because of interest rate differentials.
Extra returns from investing in high-interest-rate countries are offset by corresponding currency depreciation.
Uncovered Interest Rate Parity and the FX Carry Trade
1- Uncovered Interest Rate Parity (UIP):
– High-yield currencies are expected to depreciate, offsetting any gains from higher interest rates.
– However, studies show that high-yield currencies often do not depreciate as much as UIP predicts, particularly in the short term.
2- FX Carry Trade:
– The carry trade exploits UIP’s failure to hold.
– Strategy:
– Take a long position in a high-yield currency.
– Take a short position in a low-yield currency (borrow at a lower rate and invest at a higher rate).
– Profitability depends on two factors:
– The high-yield currency not depreciating by the expected percentage.
– Returns being sufficient to cover the borrowing costs of the low-yield currency.
3- Performance of the Carry Trade:
– During low volatility:
– Generates a steady stream of small gains.
– During market turbulence (“flight to quality”):
– Investors flock to safe-haven currencies, causing large losses for carry trades.
– This results in a negative skew with a fat left tail in the distribution of returns, meaning rare but extreme losses.
For carry trading to be profitable, the high-yield currency must not depreciate by the percentage that would be expected if uncovered interest parity held. Additionally, the returns must be sufficient to cover the interest that is charged to borrow the low-yield currency.
Relationship Between Current Account, Capital Account, and Exchange Rates
1- Role of Accounts in Economic Activity:
– Current account: Reflects real economic activity, such as trading goods and services (exports/imports).
– Capital account: Captures investment and financing activity, including cross-border financial flows.
2- Linkage Through Exchange Rates:
– Decisions about trading goods/services differ from investment decisions, but exchange rates align these activities.
– Persistent current account deficits (more imports than exports) often lead to currency depreciation, as the current account deficit must be offset by a capital account surplus (financial inflows).
3- Drivers of Exchange Rate Movements:
– Over the short- and intermediate-term, exchange rate movements are primarily driven by investment/financing decisions, rather than trade.
Reasons:
– Prices of real goods and services adjust slowly, while exchange rates and asset prices adjust quickly.
– Production adjustments for real goods/services take time, whereas financial flows can be reallocated rapidly.
– Investment/financing decisions involve funding current expenditures and reallocating assets within portfolios.
– Expected exchange rate movements strongly influence investment/financing decisions.
Current Account Imbalances and the Determination of Exchange Rates
1- The Flow Supply/Demand Channel:
It suggests that countries with persistent current account surpluses tend to see their domestic currency appreciate, while deficit countries experience depreciation. However, as a currency strengthens, it eventually reduces export competitiveness and weakens the country’s terms of trade.
– The degree of exchange rate response depends on:
— The initial trade gap (difference between imports and exports).
— The sensitivity of prices and demand for imports and exports to currency fluctuations.
– Empirical Observations:
— Companies in deficit countries often limit price increases to maintain market share, which delays full adjustment to currency fluctuations.
— This adjustment lag can take several years to fully materialize.
2- The Portfolio Balance Channel:
This channel explains that current account imbalances shift financial wealth from deficit nations to surplus nations. Countries with persistent trade deficits must borrow to finance these imbalances, and over time, investors may reduce their holdings of deficit nations’ debt. This reduction in demand for debt puts downward pressure on the currencies of deficit countries.
3- The Debt Sustainability Channel:
Current account deficits lead to growing foreign debt, which cannot be sustained indefinitely due to the existence of potential debt limits. When these limits are reached, currencies face downward pressure. Conversely, surplus countries accumulate foreign currency assets, which creates upward pressure on the long-run equilibrium value of their currency.
Capital Flows and the Determination of Exchange Rates
Global Financial Integration and Exchange Rates
1- Global Financial Integration:
Global financial integration has significantly increased the ease of moving capital across borders, resulting in volatile exchange rates, interest rates, and price bubbles. Capital flows into emerging markets, though substantial, often end abruptly, causing severe economic disruption.
2- One-Sided Capital Flows and Carry Trades:
One-sided capital flows can persist for long periods, creating opportunities for positive excess returns in carry trading strategies. Governments in high-yield markets may implement tighter fiscal policies to stabilize prices and achieve sustainable economic growth, which can increase the long-run equilibrium value of the currency.
– Sticky positive excess returns are partly explained by the gradual responses of monetary policymakers to changing conditions.
Equity Market Trends and Exchange Rates : The relationship between equity markets and exchange rates is unstable and influenced by changing market conditions.
– In the United States, the correlation between domestic equity returns and the US dollar is highly variable over short periods but tends to zero in the long term.
– Since the 2008 financial crisis, this correlation has generally been negative. Investors flock to the US dollar as a safe haven during “risk-off” periods and exhibit the opposite behavior when taking on more risk.
Debt Sustainability Channel
The Debt Sustainability Channel describes how current account imbalances impact the financial wealth of deficit and surplus nations:
1- Deficit Nations:
– Persistent current account deficits require borrowing from surplus nations.
– There is a limit to how much debt can be sustainably borrowed.
– If the debt becomes too large, the country may need to print money to repay it, leading to:
— Depreciation of the currency’s long-run equilibrium value.
2- Surplus Nations:
– Countries with persistent current account surpluses accumulate financial wealth by lending to deficit nations.
– These countries can expect their currency’s value to appreciate over time as the long-run equilibrium adjusts upward.
1- Capital Mobility
This refers to how easily financial capital (money for investments) can move between countries.
Mobile Capital:
– Capital can move freely across borders with little or no restrictions (e.g., in developed economies with open financial systems).
– Investors can quickly reallocate funds to take advantage of higher interest rates in other countries.
Immobile Capital:
– Capital movement is restricted by factors such as government regulations, capital controls, or underdeveloped financial markets (e.g., in some emerging or developing economies).
– Investors cannot easily move money abroad, even if foreign interest rates are more attractive.
2- Sensitivity to Interest Rate Differentials
This refers to how strongly investors respond to differences in interest rates between countries.
Sensitive to Interest Rate Differentials:
– Investors are highly responsive to even small changes in interest rates.
– If domestic rates rise relative to foreign rates, there will be large capital inflows as investors chase higher returns.
– If domestic rates fall, capital outflows occur as investors seek better returns abroad.
Insensitive to Interest Rate Differentials:
– Investors are less responsive to interest rate differences.
– Other factors (e.g., exchange rate stability, political risk, or transaction costs) may outweigh interest rate considerations when deciding where to invest.
– Even if interest rates are higher in one country, investors might not move their capital due to these non-interest-related concerns.
Combined Implications in the Context of Monetary and Fiscal Policy:
Mobile and Sensitive Capital Flows:
– Capital moves freely and responds strongly to interest rate changes.
– Policies that increase interest rates (e.g., restrictive monetary or expansionary fiscal) attract significant foreign capital inflows, leading to currency appreciation.
Immobile or Insensitive Capital Flows:
– Capital does not move easily or does not react strongly to interest rate changes.
– Policies that raise interest rates are less effective in attracting foreign capital, so they are more likely to result in trade imbalances (e.g., increased imports) and downward pressure on the domestic currency.
The Mundell-Fleming Model
The Mundell-Fleming model assumes an economy operates below capacity, enabling output to increase without triggering inflation. The model examines the effects of monetary and fiscal policies on interest rates, economic activity, capital flows, and exchange rates.
1- Expansionary Monetary Policy:
– Effect on Interest Rates: Lowers interest rates, increasing investment and consumption.
– Effect on Capital Flows: Lower interest rates prompt capital outflows as investors seek higher yields abroad.
– Effect on Currency: Flexible exchange rates result in downward pressure on the domestic currency.
2- Expansionary Fiscal Policy:
– Effect on Output: Boosts government spending and output.
– Effect on Interest Rates: Raises real interest rates.
– Effect on Currency:
— If capital flows are highly sensitive to interest rate differentials, the domestic currency appreciates as higher rates attract foreign investors.
— If capital flows are insensitive, the domestic currency depreciates because increased imports are not offset by capital inflows.
Mundell-Fleming Model and Capital Mobility
The Mundell-Fleming model describes how the interaction of fiscal and monetary policies affects exchange rates, depending on the degree of capital mobility.
High Capital Mobility (Common in developed economies):
1- Expansionary Fiscal Policy:
– The currency’s movement is ambiguous due to competing effects of higher interest rates (currency appreciation) and increased imports (currency depreciation).
2- Restrictive Fiscal Policy:
– The domestic currency depreciates as lower government spending reduces interest rates and capital inflows.
3- Expansionary Monetary Policy:
– The domestic currency depreciates as lower interest rates encourage capital outflows.
4- Restrictive Monetary Policy:
– The domestic currency appreciates as higher interest rates attract capital inflows.
Low Capital Mobility (Common in emerging markets):
1- Expansionary Fiscal Policy:
– The domestic currency depreciates as increased imports outweigh limited capital inflows.
2- Restrictive Fiscal Policy:
– The currency’s movement is ambiguous due to trade flow effects and restricted capital movement.
3- Expansionary Monetary Policy:
– The currency’s movement is ambiguous due to the balance of trade and capital flow effects.
4- Restrictive Monetary Policy:
– The domestic currency appreciates due to reduced imports and increased demand for the domestic currency.
Monetary Models of Exchange Rate Determination
The Monetary Models focus on how monetary policy affects exchange rates through price levels and inflation, assuming fixed output.
Key Models and Assumptions:
1- Pure Monetary Approach:
– Assumes purchasing power parity (PPP) holds at all times.
– A 5% increase in price levels due to expansionary monetary policy leads to a 5% devaluation in the domestic currency.
– Shortcoming: PPP does not hold in the short and medium terms, limiting the model’s real-world applicability.
2- Dornbusch Overshooting Model:
– Recognizes short-term price stickiness and long-term PPP adherence.
– Mechanism:
— An increase in the money supply reduces interest rates, prompting capital outflows as investors seek higher returns abroad.
— The domestic currency initially overshoots by depreciating below its long-run PPP equilibrium level.
— Over time, the exchange rate appreciates back to PPP, as domestic prices adjust and the economy stabilizes.
Dornbusch Overshooting Model Summary:
Short Run:
– Assumes domestic prices are inflexible in the short term.
– An increase in the nominal money supply decreases domestic interest rates.
– Lower interest rates lead to capital outflows as investors seek higher yields abroad.
– The domestic currency depreciates below its new long-run PPP equilibrium level due to the short-term rigidity of prices.
– This overshooting effect reflects the immediate adjustment of exchange rates to maintain uncovered interest rate parity.
Long Run:
– As domestic prices adjust, domestic interest rates rise to align with the long-term equilibrium.
– The domestic currency appreciates toward its new long-run equilibrium value, consistent with the pure monetary model.
– In the long term, PPP holds, and the exchange rate stabilizes at the level implied by the increased money supply and higher domestic prices.
The increase in interest rates will trigger currency appreciation. Foreign investors will flock to the higher rates and thus increase the demand for the currency. But in the long run, the government debt will increase the risk and lead to currency depreciation.
The Portfolio Balance Approach
The Portfolio Balance Approach highlights the long-term consequences of fiscal imbalances, which are not accounted for in the Mundell-Fleming model. Persistent fiscal deficits lead to an increasing supply of government debt, and investors require adequate compensation to hold this debt, achieved through:
1- Higher Interest Rates: Investors demand higher returns to compensate for the growing debt risk.
2- Currency Depreciation: An immediate depreciation can generate gains from subsequent appreciation.
3- A Combination of Both Effects: Balancing higher interest rates with currency movements.
Short-Run vs. Long-Run Effects of Expansionary Fiscal Policy:
– Short Run:
— Real interest rates rise, leading to currency appreciation.
— Foreign investors are attracted by higher returns, increasing demand for the domestic currency.
– Long Run:
— Persistent fiscal deficits increase government debt, raising concerns over sustainability.
— Investors may expect the central bank to monetize debt, creating inflationary pressures.
— Currency depreciation becomes more likely as long-term risks materialize.
Ultimately, countries with persistent deficits will see their currencies decline over the long term, even if expansionary fiscal policies initially trigger appreciation. Investors will only hold such debt if interest rates are sufficiently high or positive future currency movements are anticipated.
1- Expansionary Monetary Policy:
Mechanism: Central banks lower interest rates to stimulate economic growth.
Impact on Interest Rates:
– Reduced interest rates make borrowing cheaper, encouraging investment and consumption.
– Lower rates lead to capital outflows as investors seek higher yields elsewhere, causing downward pressure on the domestic currency.
2- Restrictive Monetary Policy:
Mechanism: Central banks raise interest rates to combat inflation or slow an overheated economy.
Impact on Interest Rates:
– Higher interest rates increase the cost of borrowing, reducing investment and consumption.
– Capital inflows increase as foreign investors are attracted by higher yields, causing upward pressure on the domestic currency.
3- Expansionary Fiscal Policy:
Mechanism: The government increases spending or lowers taxes, leading to higher aggregate demand.
Impact on Interest Rates:
– Rising budget deficits push up real interest rates due to increased government borrowing.
– If capital flows are mobile and sensitive to interest rate differentials:
— Higher interest rates attract foreign capital, leading to currency appreciation.
– If capital flows are immobile or insensitive:
— Foreign capital inflows are limited, and increased imports create downward pressure on the currency.
4- Restrictive Fiscal Policy:
Mechanism: The government reduces spending or raises taxes to curb deficits and control inflation.
Impact on Interest Rates:
– Reduced borrowing needs lower interest rates, making credit more affordable.
– Lower rates may decrease capital inflows, potentially weakening the domestic currency if investors seek better returns abroad.
Fiscal and Monetary Policy Combinations:
1- Expansionary Fiscal Policy & Expansionary Monetary Policy:
– Both policies aim to stimulate the economy, leading to an increase in aggregate demand.
– Higher aggregate demand drives up imports, worsening the trade deficit.
– The domestic currency depreciates due to increased demand for foreign goods and capital outflows caused by lower interest rates.
2- Expansionary Fiscal Policy & Restrictive Monetary Policy:
– Fiscal policy boosts aggregate demand through increased government spending or tax cuts.
– Monetary policy raises interest rates, which attracts foreign capital inflows.
– The domestic currency appreciates due to higher interest rates, but aggregate demand may remain high, sustaining a trade deficit.
3- Restrictive Fiscal Policy & Expansionary Monetary Policy:
– Fiscal policy reduces aggregate demand through government spending cuts or tax increases.
– Monetary policy lowers interest rates, stimulating investment and consumption.
– Imports may rise due to higher aggregate demand from monetary stimulus, causing a trade deficit and currency depreciation.
4- Restrictive Fiscal Policy & Restrictive Monetary Policy:
– Both policies aim to reduce aggregate demand, slowing down economic activity.
– Reduced aggregate demand lowers imports and improves the trade balance.
– The domestic currency may appreciate as interest rates rise and aggregate demand declines.
Capital Flows: Benefits and Risks
Benefits of Capital Inflows:
– Supplement domestic savings to finance domestic investment.
– Support economic growth by providing additional funds for productive activities.
Risks of Capital Inflows:
– Can create asset price bubbles and lead to overvaluation of the domestic currency.
– Abrupt reversals of inflows can trigger market crashes and economic instability.
Motivations Behind Capital Flows:
1- Pull Factors:
– Attract foreign investors due to domestic conditions like:
— Sound economic policies.
— Lower inflation.
— Privatizations or improved fiscal positions.
— Financial market liberalization.
2- Push Factors:
– External conditions that push investors abroad, such as:
— Low domestic interest rates.
— Desire to diversify portfolios and seek higher yields.
Managing Capital Flows:
– Policymakers implement measures to avoid destabilizing inflows and outflows:
— Impose restrictions on repatriating investments.
— Tax currency transactions to limit speculative capital movements.
— Central banks can intervene in the foreign exchange market by selling domestic currency to prevent excessive appreciation.
Objective of Policy Measures:
– Prevent large, destabilizing capital inflows that can result in severe outflows, leading to economic crashes.
Capital Controls and Exchange Rate Interventions
Capital Controls:
– Economists traditionally opposed capital controls, arguing they distort global trade and finance.
– However, institutions like the IMF now recognize that limited capital controls can have net benefits:
– Prevent asset price bubbles.
– Allow central banks to maintain independent monetary policy without being pressured by surging capital flows.
Currency Interventions:
– Governments and central banks directly intervene in currency markets to influence exchange rates.
– Effectiveness varies by market type:
– Emerging Markets:
– Interventions are more effective because government trading accounts for a larger share of currency market activity.
– Developed Markets:
– Interventions are less impactful due to the vast size and liquidity of currency markets.