Economic Concepts Flashcards
A price ceiling that is below the market equilibrium price would be expected to result in which one of the following sets of effects on demand and supply?
Shortage Excess
If both demand and supply have traditional curves, a higher equilibrium price may be caused by which one of the following?
An increase in demand.
A higher equilibrium price (and quantity) would be caused by an increase in demand.
A city ordinance that establishes a price ceiling on rent may cause
the quantity of rental space demanded to exceed the quantity supplied.
Correct!
A city ordinance that freezes rent prices will cause the quantity of rental space demanded to exceed the quantity supplied. Specifically, a freeze in rental prices would cause the actual price charged (the controlled price) to be less than the equilibrium price, resulting in a shortage of rentable space. Since suppliers (landlords) are prevented from raising prices to an equilibrium level, they will cease to invest in rentable space, causing a shortage.
If the price for a good is fixed by government fiat below market equilibrium price, which one of the following will occur?
Excess demand.
If the price for a good is fixed by government fiat below market equilibrium price, an excess demand will result. Because the price that can be charged is limited (price ceiling), less supply will be provided, such that demand will exceed supply. There will be an excess demand.
What is the effect on the quantity of a commodity supplied relative to demand as a result of a government-mandated price ceiling or price floor?
Quantity Shortage Quantity Surplus
A price ceiling is a government-mandated maximum price that can be charged for a good or service. Rent controls, for example, establish the maximum price that can be charged for rent.
Price ceilings result in a lower price than would otherwise occur in a free market and cause the quantity of a commodity supplied to be less than would be demanded at a free market price.
Thus, a shortage exists as the difference between quantity supplied at the price ceiling and the greater quantity demanded at that price. A price floor is a government-mandated minimum price for a good or service. The minimum wage law, for example, establishes the minimum wage that can be paid to employees.
Price floors result in a higher price than would otherwise occur in a free market and cause the quantity of a commodity supplied to be greater than would be demanded at a free market price.
Thus, a surplus exists as the difference between quantity supplied at the price floor and the lesser quantity demanded at that price.
A project’s net present value, ignoring income tax considerations, is normally affected by the
Proceeds from the sale of the asset to be replaced.
The net present value approach is based on cash flows. Only the proceeds from sale of the asset to be replaced is a cash flow. The remaining alternatives are not cash flows, and do not cause cash flows to change when income tax effects are ignored. In the equipment replacement decision, the proceeds from the sale of the old asset (not its carrying value) increase the net present value of the replacement alternative.
Yarrow Co. is considering the purchase of a new machine that costs $450,000. The new machine will generate net cash flow of $150,000 per year and net income of $100,000 per year for five years. Yarrow’s desired rate of return is 6%. The present value factor for a five-year annuity of $1, discounted at 6%, is 4.212. The present value factor of $1, at compound interest of 6% due in five years, is 0.7473. What is the new machine’s net present value?
$181,800
The net present value of the new machine is determined as the present value of future cash inflows less the present value of the current costs of the machine. Net income is not relevant in computing the net present value. In this question, the cash inflow is $150,000 per year for five years. The present value of that inflow is $150,000 x 4.212 (the present value of an annuity for five years) = $631,800. The present value of the cost of the new machine is $450,000. Thus, the net present value of the machine is $631,800 - $450,000 = $181,800.
A corporation is considering purchasing a machine that costs $100,000 and has a $20,000 salvage value. The machine will provide net annual cash inflows of $25,000 per year and has a six-year life. The corporation uses a discount rate of 10%. The discount factor for the present value of a single sum six years in the future is 0.564. The discount factor for the present value of an annuity for six years is 4.355. What is the net present value of the machine?
$20,155
The net present value of the new machine is determined as the present value of future cash inflows less the present value of the current costs of the machine. The facts of this question contain two cash inflows: (1) the cash inflow of $25,000 per year for six years; and (2) the cash inflow from the salvage value of $20,000 at the end of the asset’s life. The present values of those inflows are $25,000 x 4.355 (the present value of an annuity for six years) = $108,875 and $20,000 x .564 (the present value of $1 discounted for six years) = $11,280, for a total of $108,875 + $11,280 = $120,155. The present value of the cost of the new machine is $100,000. Thus, the net present value of the machine is $120,155 - $100,000 = $20,155.
Salem Co. is considering a project that yields annual net cash inflows of $420,000 for years 1 through 5, and net cash inflow of $100,000 in year 6. The project will require an initial investment of $1,800,000. Salem’s cost of capital is 10%. Present value information is present below:
Present value of $1 for 5 years at 10% is .62.
Present value of $1 for 6 years at 10% is .56.
Present value of an annuity of $1 for 5 years at 10% is 3.79.
What was Salem’s expected net present value for this project?
($152,200)
The expected net present value for this project is $152,200. The calculation would be the net present value for the first 5 years using the annuity factor ($420,000 x 3.79) plus the present value for year 6 using the present value of $1 factor ($100,000 x .56), both subtracted from the initial investment to get the net present value. Thus, the computation would be $1,591,800 (which is $420,000 x 3.79) + $56,000 (which is $100,000 x .56) equals $1,647,800 (the present value of future cash inflows), subtracted from the present value of the initial investment of $1,800,000, resulting in a net present value of $152,200. In summary, the calculation is $1,800,000 - ($1,591,800 + $56,000) = $152,200, the expected net present value.
Net present value as used in investment decision-making is stated in terms of which of the following options?
Cash flow.
Net present value as used in investment decision-making is stated in terms of cash flow; specifically, in terms of the present value of cash flow. If the net present value of cash flow is zero or positive, an investment project is economically feasible.
Tam Co. is negotiating for the purchase of equipment that would cost $100,000, with the expectation that $20,000 per year could be saved in after-tax cash costs if the equipment is acquired. The equipment’s estimated useful life is 10 years, with no residual value, and would be depreciated by the straight-line method. Tam’s predetermined minimum desired rate of return is 12%. Present value of an annuity of 1 at 12% for 10 periods is 5.65. Present value of 1 due in 10 periods at 12% is .322.
Net present value is
$13,000
The computation of net present value (NPV) is:
NPV = Present value of cash inflows - Present value of cash outflows.
For the facts given, the calculation would be: NPV = ($20,000 x 5.65) - $100,000 = $113,000 - $100,000 = $13,000.
With positive NPV of $13,000, the decision should be to accept the project.
Smarti Co. has determined the following data in connection with its evaluation of a capital investment project:
Initial cost of project $75,000 Estimated periods benefited 10 years Estimated annual savings $15,000 Estimated residual value $ 5,000 Cost of capital 10% Smarti uses straight-line depreciation for capital investments of this type. Excerpts from present value tables showed the following:
Using the above information, which one of the following is the present value of total estimated future cash inflows and savings? (Ignore income taxes.)
$94,105
B is correct. The total present value is the sum of the present value of a series (annuity) of savings plus the present value of the one-time residual value. The calculation of these elements is:
PV of savings = $15,000 x PV of an annuity at 10% for 10 years
PV of savings = $15,000 x 6.145 = $92,175
PV of residual value = $5,000 x PV of $1.00 at 10% for 10 years
PV of residual value = $5,000 x .386 = $1,930
Total PV = $92,175 + $1,930 = $94,105
$94,105 = Present value of total estimated future cash inflows and savings.
The calculation of depreciation is used in the determination of the net present value of an investment for which of the following reasons?
Depreciation increases cash flow by reducing income taxes.
Determining the net present value of an investment is done by comparing the present value of the expected cash inflows (revenues or savings) of the project with the initial cash investment in the project (outflows). Since the amount of depreciation expense taken reduces taxes due, it reduces cash outflow by the amount of taxes saved. The present value of that saving enters into the determination of present values for net present value assessment purposes.
A company is considering two projects, which have the following details:
Project A Project B
Expected sales $1,000 $1,500
Cash operating expense 400 700
Depreciation 150 250
Tax rate 30% 30%
Which project would provide the largest after-tax cash inflow?
Project B because after-tax cash inflow equals $635.
The project with the largest after-tax [net] cash inflow would be project B, with a net cash inflow of $635. The net cash inflow would be computed as: $1,500 - $700 = $800 x (1 - .30) = $800 x .70 = $560 + ($250 x .30) = $560 + $75 = $635. The ($250 x .30) is the tax savings from the deductibility of the depreciation for tax purposes.
When estimating cash flow for use in capital budgeting, depreciation is
Utilized in determining the tax costs or benefit.
Depreciation may be used to determine the effect on tax costs or benefit from the recognition of depreciation expense for tax purposes. Specifically, depreciation expense recognized for tax purposes reduces taxable income and, therefore, the amount of tax paid (cash outflow).
In evaluating the economic feasibility of a capital project, the discount rate (or hurdle rate of return) must be determined in advance when using the:
Net present value method.
The net present value method of evaluating capital projects uses a discount rate (also called hurdle rate or cost of capital rate) to discount future cash flows (or savings) to their present value. Thus, the discount rate or hurdle rate must be established in advance of using the method.
The present value of future cash inflows (or savings) is then subtracted from the cost (present values) of the project.
If the net present value is positive, the project is economically feasible.