Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

JMS 220 > ECON MIDTERM > Flashcards

ECON MIDTERM Flashcards

1
Q

Law of supply

A

an increase in price leads to an increase in supply (and vice versa)
Function = Qs = f(P), reflects Marginal Private Cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Law of demand

A

an increase in price leads to a decrease in demand (and vice versa)
Function = Qd = f(P)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Market equilibrium

A

When quantity supplied = quantity demanded
Solved by equating both functions (Qs = Qd)
Maximizes consumer + producer surplus (but market failure exists)
Does not maximize Marginal External Cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Consumer surplus

A

difference between consumer’s willingness to pay and what price consumer actually pays
(area under demand curve)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Producer surplus

A

difference between producer’s willingness to supply and what price producer actually receives
(area above supply)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

total/economic/welfare/social surplus

A

consumer surplus + producer surplus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Market failures

A

inefficient distribution of goods due to other incentives, no equilibrium
To solve –> government intervention (taxes/subsidies)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Externalities

A
  • when actions of one individual (or firm) have direct, unintentional, and uncompensated effect on the well-being of other individuals or the profits of other firms
  • costs/benefits not reflected in market price → lead to inefficiency because private market participants do not account for the full social costs/benefits of their actions (ex. pollution)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Public goods

A

non-excludable + non-rival goods → lead to under-provision due to free-riders (ex. Clean air)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Goods spectrum

A

Non-excludable = you can’t be prevented from using the good
Excludable = I can be prevented from using a certain good
Non-rival = my consumption of the good does not limit anyone else’s quantity/quality of the good
Rival = me using a good reduces others’ availability/quality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Albedo effect

A

reflectivity of Earth’s surface → lower albedo (less reflection, more absorption) accelerates warming

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Tipping points/Feedback loops

A

threshold that triggers self-reinforcing changes in climate system (ice sheet melting increases absorption of carbon)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How do we know CO2 concentrations are caused by human activity?

A

Isotopic composition of carbon in atmosphere (shows an increase in emissions from burning of fossil fuels/industrial activities)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Different degree scenarios

A

At 1.5 C → all warm water coral reefs shrink and threatened to go extinct + permafrost thaw + food supply becomes unstable
At 2 C → wildfires + desertification (land cannot support vegetation)
At 3 C → ocean life suffers widespread losses + crops yields decline in tropical regions
At 4.5 C → (catastrophic) food supply suffers worldwide + ocean life losses in all ocean environments + wildfires even more severe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Climate sensitivity

A

The long term equilibrium temperature change as Co2 atmospheric concentration doubles from pre-industrial levels (estimates = 1.5-4.5) → how much will mean global temperature change if we double levels?
IPCC AR6 says 3, between 2-5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Emissions pathways

A

Different scenarios/trajectories of how the world might play out (future emissions/temperature increase)
SSPs (Shared Socioeconomic Pathways) → provide different narratives of global development, cooperation, and challenges alongside GHG emissions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Climate vs weather

A

Climate = the potential possibilities of what weather could be (long-term average of weather patterns)
Weather = the realization of one of those possibilities (short-term atmospheric conditions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Link between economic activity and emissions

A

economic growth –> Co2 emissions –> climate change –> economic impact –> environment policies reduce emissions –> economic growth…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

“getting off fossil fuels” supply theory

A

If fossil fuels become more scarce → supply decreases → drive up equilibrium and other alternatives will become more cost competitive
BUT technological improvements → supply/quantity increase (shift curve outwards)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

“getting off fossil fuels” demand theory

A

As more renewables are introduced, renewables price decreases + quantity increases → fossil fuels price decreases + demand increases

21
Q

Total costs of reducing GHG emissions

A

increase at an increasing rate

22
Q

Total benefits of reducing GHG emissions

A

increase at a decreasing rate

23
Q

Free riding

A

When you benefit from a good without having to pay for it (leads to under-provision in a competitive market)

24
Q

Coase theorem

A

In the case of an externality:
If:
Property rights are clearly defined
There are no transactions costs
There aren’t too many parties involved
Then:
Private parties will bargain to achieve the socially optimal solution

25
Q

measuring benefits for market goods

A

use market prices (willingness to pay)

26
Q

measuring benefits for non-market goods

A

revealed preference method = observing people’s behavior to infer valuation
stated preference method = survey what people are willing to pay

27
Q

Monetization of benefits

A

putting a value on environmental damages (key to having common measuring stick but where BCA gets attacked a lot)
+ measuring benefits is difficult but not including a benefit implicitly assumes that benefit is zero!

28
Q

Estimating costs

A

The Survey Approach
Involves asking polluters about their control costs
Drawback: people lie (no incentive to tell the truth)
The Engineering Approach
Using engineering information to estimate the technologies available and the costs of purchasing and using those technologies
The Combined Approach
Combining both survey and engineering approaches

29
Q

Value of Statistical Life (VSL)

A

metric used to quantify the benefits of reducing mortality risks (measured by estimating people’s willingness to pay for small reduction in mortality risk)
*Makes up the bulk of benefits usually
*NOT what you would pay to avoid certain death
*Can be measured empirically → evaluating trade offs individuals make when choosing to work in risky industries for higher wages

30
Q

Present value (PV or NPV)

A

adding up the discounted/future costs and benefits over time
formula = PV(benefits) - PV(costs)
PV(benefits) = bt/(1+r)^t
PV(cost) = ct/(1+r)^t

31
Q

Aggregate

A

total demand or total supply (adding up all individual data)

32
Q

Benefit cost analysis

A

analysis used to maximize net benefits (economic efficiency)
–> helps in choosing among alternatives (apply this in daily decision making + any major regulation requires this analysis)

33
Q

Criterion for BCA

A

Potential Pareto Improvement (PPI) (or Kaldor-Hicks criterion) → change in allocation of goods harms no one and benefits at least one person (no brainer)
Only adopt a project (vs. status quo) if net present value (NPV) of net benefits is positive → total benefits outweighs total costs

34
Q

Low discount rate

A

places more value in the future +
long term approach + trying to save future generations from high damages while impacting present policies more (ex. High carbon tax)

35
Q

High discount rate

A

places less value in the future + short term approach + trying to save the present population while letting future generations suffer from climate change damages (ex. Few climate regulations)

36
Q

Descriptive (opportunity cost) approach

A

alternative to discount rate –> investing resources according to real rates of return + discount rate should be determined by the opportunity cost of capital

37
Q

Prescriptive (normative) approach

A

alternative to discount rate –> unethical to discount the future generations (so use a low discount rate) but take into account that future generations will be wealthier
*distinguish between discount rates on goods vs. welfare of future people

38
Q

Social Discount Rate

A

prescriptive approach, using the Ramsey equation
pure rate of time preference + (elasticity of the marginal utility of consumption)(expected per capita growth rate of consumption)

39
Q

Uncertainty and discounting

A

It’s difficult to predict the future + interest rates could be different in the future + uncertainty in discount rate provides justification to use a lower discount rate

40
Q

Social Cost of Carbon (SCC)

A
  • MOST IMPORTANT NUMBER IN THIS CLASS
  • SCC is an estimate of the economic damages that would result from emitting one additional ton of CO2 into the atmosphere (Co2 = benchmark but other greenhouse gasses are included)
  • Used for: valuing the benefits of reducing climate change
  • Calculated using IAMs
    (Integrated assessment models = computer models that combine scientific and socioeconomic aspects of climate change to produce insights for decision making (3 main = DICE, FUND, PAGE))
41
Q

Damage functions

A

way to relate temperature to economic damages/GDP (Quadratic functions of global mean temperature)

42
Q

Top Down approach

A

using historical data to estimate broad relationships between temperature and economic output (macro, wide)

43
Q

Bottom Up approach

A

focusing on specific sectors/regions to estimate climate impacts (micro, zoomed in)

44
Q

Climate change is nonlinear because

A
  • Small temperature increase = huge disproportionate impact
  • Damages accelerate as temperature increases
    - Heterogeneous damages = effects of climate change vary across different groups/places
45
Q

Adapting to climate change

A

flattens the relationship between temperature and the outcome of interests

46
Q

current estimates (topdown/bottomup)

A

don’t take into account adaptations –> biased/incorrect (Ideal estimate takes into account full effect on welfare (benefit + cost of adaptation))

47
Q

Long difference approach

A

look at average temps/GDP growth from one past period and then average temps/GDP growth from now period (this captures adaptations but requires a lot of data)

48
Q

CARE (climate adaptive response estimation)

A

Compare San Diego to Imperial Valley → we can tell SD will turn into IV so we actually don’t need all this data we can just use what we already have
(accounts for intensive/extensive margins but not technological advances)

49
Q

Marginal Social Cost

A

MSC = MPC + MEC

JMS 220 (3 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions