EC132 Flashcards
3 characteristics that set firms and markets apart
FIRMS
Centralised decision making
Coordination via communication
Personal interaction
MARKETS
Decentralised decision making
Coordination via prices
Anonymous interaction
What is a transaction cost?
A cost to using the market itself
The Fundamental Problem of Exchange
A merchant has cargo and wants to trade to consumers using an agent.
If he trusts the agent, then the agent can sell the cargo and return the revenue, and get paid a wage.
BUT a rational agent might reason differently: since the revenue must exceed the wage, then why not keep all the revenue and never return to the merchant?
BUT a rational merchant realises this and will not trust the agent with his cargo.
What is a cooperation problem?
Individual’s incentives not aligned with the group
Examples of cooperation problems
Price cutting
Advertising
Innovation and product adoption
Overfishing
Drug use in sports
Stockpiling nuclear weapons
Studying on EC132
Grade inflation
What is a coordination problem?
A situation in which the interests of agents coincide, while the aim is to try to reach an outcome in which those interests are satisfied.
Examples of coordination problems
Product differentiation
Trading and specialisation
Bank runs
Competing standards
Coordinating hiring decisions
Crossing the road en-masse
Main differences between cooperation and coordination problems
Cooperation problems:
Conflict between best individual outcome and mutual benefit
Cheating is the major concern
Not always strategic
Coordination problems:
Many feasible mutually beneficial outcomes
Coordination is the major concern
Heavily strategic
Spot contract
Immediate and one-off transaction using established market prices and terms of trade
Advantages of spot contracts
Best for simple transactions where both parties know what they’re getting
No further commitment on both sides
Low transaction cost
Easily and widely implementable
Classical contracts
Legally enforceable contract detailing specific terms of exchange. Long-term and often with finite length.
Advantages of classical contracts
Desirable for long term transactions
Provides what-if contingencies
Prevents opportunism
Can incentivise mutually beneficial investments
Why are classical contracts so important for firms?
UNCERTAINTY IS COSTLY TO MANAGE
-Changing input prices and suppliers
-Hiring new employees
PREVENTS OPPORTUNISM (CHEATING)
-Downstream buyers not paying
-Suppliers sending lower quality goods
-‘Hold-up’
Relational/implicit contracts
Unwritten codes of conduct sustained by the value of future relationships. Roles may be informally defined but no explicit ‘terms’. Long term with no fixed end point.
Examples of a relational contract in a classical contract
Discretionary bonuses / promotions
-Usually on the basis of qualitatively assessed performance
-Can be based on tasks not anticipated/included in classical contract
-Contingent on company performance
Pros of relational contracts
Can incentivise non-contractible outcomes
Does not require legal enforcement
Flexible
Cons of relational contracts
Limited applicability
Open to abuse of power
Exposed to cultural misunderstandings
Cons of classical contracts
High transaction cost
Some things are non-contractible
Require strong legal institutions
Cons of spot contracts
Can lead to short-term opportunism
Difficult to encourage long-term investment
Exposed to price volatility
What is the problem with performance related pay?
Noise, much higher risk for employees
Manipulation of performance metrics
Focus on measurable tasks encourages the employees to neglect other non-measurable tasks (e.g. Teachers only teaching students to pass exams)
What does it mean by a firm being a ‘nexus of contracts’?
Spot contracts between firm and customers
Classical contracts between firms and suppliers
Relational contracts between employees
New incentive problems created by firms
Shirking
Empire building
Lobbying for company resources
5 solutions to coordination problems
Commitment
Authority
Delegation
Convention
Reputation
What does a manager do to solve coordination problems?
Coordinate (set goals and objectives, communicate)
Lead (establish conventions)