EBP in math Flashcards

1
Q

Language and communication disorders may interfere with students’ functioning when they are expected to read, write, and discuss ideas about mathematics

A

Montague (1996)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  • Use of schematic diagrams to map important information related to a particular problem type
  • Highlight schematic relations in the problem to facilitate translation and solution
  • Semantic relations in a problem
A

Jitendra, Hoff, & Beck (1999)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  • Cognitive strategy instruction involves - (a) systematic and direct explanations and/or verbal descriptions of the performance of a task; (b) verbal modeling, questioning, and demonstrations by the teacher of the steps and processes in the routine; (c) systematic prompts and cues to use the processes, strategies, and procedures; and (d) cognitive modeling using “think aloud”
  • Cognitive strategy instruction EBP – Horner et al. (2005) and Gersten et al. (2005) standards
A

Swanson (1999)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  • Mnemonic instruction - Effect size of 1.62

* Effect sizes of various studies show mnemonic instruction largest and most consistent use in special education

A

Scruggs & Mastropieri (2000)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  • CRA first involves the use of concrete materials that develop into representational and eventually abstract thought
  • EBP as identified by Bouck et al. (2017) using CEC standards
A

Witzel, Mercer, & Miller (2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Emphasis on reading and phonological processes in identification and treatment of learning disabilities has increased

A

Mastropieri, Scruggs, Davidson, & Rana (2004)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  • Invivo instruction
  • Systematic instruction
  • Numerous opportunities to respond
  • EBPs for teaching math to students with severe intellectual disabilities using Horner et al.’s (2005) standards
A

Browder, Spooner, Ahlgrim-Delzell, Harris, & Wakeman (2008)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  • Cognitive strategy instruction (for mathematical problem solving) – Focuses on metacognition or self-regulation
  • EBP for students with learning disabilities using Horner et al.’s (2005) standards and Gersten et al.’s (2005) standards
A

Montague (2008)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  • Mnemonic strategy instruction (positive evidence exists for using mnemonics to teach essential content vocabulary)
  • Learn and remember new and important information through mnemonic device that purposefully connects new information to information already familiar to student
  • Select vocabulary, create mnemonics, incorporate in instruction, plan systematic and spaced review
A

Ricommini, Sanders, & Jones (2008)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  • Constant time delay
  • Errorless learning procedure
  • Picture and word recognition skill
  • EBP according to Horner et al.’s (2005) standards
A

Browder, Ahlgrim-Delzell, Spooner, Mims, & Baker (2009)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  • Explicit instruction produced significant effects
  • Visual representations - Representation of problems as a strategy
  • Illustrate solutions for mathematical problems, models
  • Sequencing
  • Verbalization
  • Feedback
A

Gersten et al. (2009)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Computer aided instruction (CAI)

A

Seo & Woo (2010)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  • Identified EBPs for teaching students with severe intellectual disabilities, reference Browder et al. (2008) – Systematic instruction, invivo instruction, numerous opportunities to respond
  • EBPs for students with significant disabilities as identified by previous reviews
A

Courtade, Test, & Cook (2014)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  • Students often demonstrate difficulty in successfully using representations to express math thinking – a representation needs to be understood for it to be useful
  • Presence of multiple representations may be counterproductive – difficulty choosing and switching as needed
  • Explicit guidance to select appropriate representation and effectively use the representation to visualize data in the problem
  • Representation of problems as a strategy met Gertsen et al. (2005) EBP standards for students with LD & MD
  • EBP for students with math difficulties and learning disabilities based on Gersten et al.’s (2005) EBP standards
A

Jitendra, Nelson, Pulles, Kiss, & Houseworth (2016)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  • CRA is graduated instructional sequence
  • Transition from solving mathematical problems with concrete objects to representational drawings to solving problems without any support abstractly
A

Agrawal & Morin (2016)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  • CRA instructional framework

* EBP for students with learning disabilities based on CEC standards

A

Bouck, Satsangi, & Park (2017)

17
Q
  • Anchored instruction
  • Schema based instruction
  • Technology
  • EBPs for teaching mathematics to students with disabilities based on EBP standards set by NTACT
A

National Technical Assistance Center on Transition (2018)

18
Q
  • Schema based instruction
  • Distinguish between three types of word problems
  • SBI as a potentially evidence-based practice (not enough total participants across methodologically sound participants)
  • Potential EBP according to CEC EBP standards
A

Cook, Collins, Morin, & Riccommini (2019)

19
Q
  • Systematic instruction (prompting)
  • Technology Aided Instruction
  • Graphic organizers
  • Manipulatives (concrete and virtual)
  • Explicit instruction (supports and scaffolds)
A

Spooner, Root, Saunders & Browder (2019)