EBDM Flashcards
[PP]
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are generally agreed to provide the highest level of medical evidence.
Explain the main difference between systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
- Systematic review
= research method to select and review multiple studies - Meta-analyses
= statistical analyses that combine results from different studies
[PP]
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are powerful research methods.
Define a systematic review and a meta-analysis.
- Systematic review
= gathers all available empirical research by using clearly defined, systematic methods (with pre-specified eligibility criteria)to obtain answers to a specific question (by providing an explicit and objective summary of evidence) - Meta-analysis
= statistical process of analysing and combining results from several similar studies
[PP]
The quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses depend on the selected studies. Provide three reasons for this.
- Eligibility criteria
- The quality and reproducibility of each study included will influence the results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses - Internal validity criteria
- Inclusion of individual studies with biases will influence systematic reviews and meta-analyses, e.g. publication bias - Internal validity criteria
- Improper assessment of quality of evidence/results in the included studies will lead to misleading results in systematic reviews and meta-analyses
[PP]
Give three reasons why systematic review and meta-analysis may not be appropriate if individual studies are too heterogeneous. (3 marks)
- SR and MA are used to combine results from different studies for the same clinical question; however, if they are too heterogeneous, it may mean the studies were answering different clinical questions (e.g. different definition of disease, different intervention & outcome)
- Different study designs (e.g. RCTs are negative, cohort studies are positive)
- Different populations => confounding factors / effect modifiers (e.g. studies with Western population are positive, studies with Eastern population are negative)
[PP]
A meta-analysis contains a forest plot that shows the adjusted estimates for the association of face mask use with viral infection causing COVID-19, SARS, or MERS.
Interpret the overall adjusted Odds ratio of 0.15 and its statistical significance.
Odds ratio of 0.15: when wearing a face mask, the chance of getting infection is 15% of not wearing a face mask.
Odds ratio < 1 => exposure is associated with a lower odds of outcome
[PP]
What kind of bias can be reduced by blinding of the subjects?
Information bias
[PP]
What kind of bias can be reduced by allocation concealment?
Selection bias
[PP]
A recent, single-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted to investigate the use of cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) to treat dementia. It reported that:
“At the post-test (26 weeks), there were no differences between the CST and TAU (treatment as usual) groups in the outcomes of cognition (mean difference [MD] = -0.55, 95% Cl -2.00 - 0.90; p=0.45) and self-reported QoL (quality of life) (MD = -0.02, 95% Cl -1.22 - 0.82; p=0.97) for people with dementia.”
Explain and interpret the 95% Cl for the outcome of cognition.
95% confidence interval (CI) means it is 95% confident that the true difference lies between -2.00 and 0.90. However, since the 95% CI crosses null value of 0, there is no statistically significant difference in cognition between CST and TAU groups
=> X find evidence to support the effectiveness of CST in improving cognitive function compared to TAU
[PP]
An epidemiological study aims to correlate the average per capita consumption of red and processed meat in different countries across the world to their incidence of pancreatic cancer. What type of study design is it?
A. Case-control study
B. Cohort study
C. Cross-sectional study
D. Ecological study
D
[PP]
Mrs. Chan, a 64-year-old clerk, recently went to a medical checkup. Her bone mineral density T-score was found to be -2.0 and therefore met the diagnostic criteria for osteopenia. As a result, Mrs. Chan became worried and asked whether she would have a higher risk of dying.
Formulate an answerable clinical question using the PICO format. (4 marks)
P: middle-aged Chinese women
I: with osteopenia
C: without osteopenia
O: mortality
[PP]
Mrs. Chan, a 64-year-old clerk, recently went to a medical checkup. Her bone mineral density T-score was found to be -2.0 and therefore met the diagnostic criteria for osteopenia. As a result, Mrs. Chan became worried and asked whether she would have a higher risk of dying.
Name one patient-oriented outcome (apart from dying) that Mrs. Chan might also care about. (1 mark)
Quality of life
Disability
Pain
Costs of intervention
[PP]
You are covering a busy medical ward overnight and you are informed by a nurse that by accident a patient has been given the wrong dose of insulin. Instead of administering 35 units of insulin the patient has received 55 units. The patient’s blood glucose is reading 1.0 mmol/L.
What kind of medical error is this? (1 mark)
Treatment error
[PP]
You are covering a busy medical ward overnight and you are informed by a nurse that by accident a patient has been given the wrong dose of insulin. Instead of administering 35 units of insulin the patient has received 55 units. The patient’s blood glucose is reading 1.0 mmol/L.
What would you do? (4 marks)
IV dextrose to correct hypoglycaemia
Monitoring of condition (e.g. blood glucose level) until stable
Report the situation to senior for follow-up
Document the error in medical record
Explain and apologise to the patient
[PP]
Name the BEST study design for answering questions about prognosis. (1 mark)
Prospective cohort study
[PP]
Ms. Wong, a 70-year-old piano teacher, is suffering from chronic low back pain. Although she is troubled by the pain, she is most worried about whether she can continue to teach piano as it is her only source of income. She asks you about her prognosis.
Formulate an answerable clinical question on prognosis using the PICO format. (4 marks)
P: Elderly Chinese women
I: With chronic low back pain
C: Without chronic low back pain
O: Prognosis (e.g. functional ability including working, quality of life)
[PP]
Observational studies show that high consumption of salted fish is positively associated with increased risk of nasopharyngeal cancer.
What type of observational study design using primary data would provide the highest level of
evidence of this association? (1 mark)
Prospective cohort study
[PP]
Suggest two patient-oriented outcomes in observational studies relevant to patients with
nasopharyngeal cancer. (2 marks)
Mortality
Morbidity
Quality of life
[PP]
Explain lead-time bias (1 mark) and how it may distort the evaluation of effectiveness of
cancer screening. (1 mark)
Lead-time: time between detection by screening and usual diagnosis
Lead-time bias: apparently improved survival time with no change in time from disease onset to death
-> make screening seemingly prolong survival
[PP]
A meta-analysis of 9 clinical trials compared outcomes of bariatric surgery and non surgical treatment among patients with obesity and type II diabetes. Patients that received surgery had a higher remission rate of diabetes compared to non-surgically treated patients (relative risk 20.1 with a confidence interval of 2.1 to 109.4), but the heterogeneity of the combined study results was high (I2 = 97%). Reading the forest plot, you realise that studies that used adjusted gastric band had a lower relative risk compared to other bariatric surgery techniques. What is recommended to perform to deal with the high heterogeneity in this meta-analysis? A. Egger test B. Fixed-effect model C. Funnel plot D. Subgroup analysis
D
Egger test: assess publication bias, test of asymmetry of funnel plots predicting discordance of results in meta-analysis
Fixed-effect model: statistical regression model, estimate effect of intrinsic characteristics of a data set (e.g. genetic factors) which are not directly observable, DV change but IV no change
Funnel plot: scatter plot, effect estimates on horizontal axis, study size on vertical axis, assess publication bias
[PP]
A new drug to treat acute migraine attacks in adults proved complete pain relief among 35% of the patients compared to 10% among patients receiving placebo. What is the number needed to treat with the new drug to prevent a migraine attack? A. 2 B. 4 C. 25 D. 40
B
NNT = 1/ARR
ARR = 0.35 - 0.1 = 0.25
[PP]
An epidemiological study aims to correlate the average per capita consumption of red and processed meat in different countries across the world to their incidence of pancreatic cancer. What type of study design is it? A. Case-control study B. Cohort study C. Cross-sectional study D. Ecological study
D
Unit of observation: individual VS group
Cross-sectional analysis: generate prevalence, X incidence
[PP]
Prevention includes a wide range of activities aiming at reducing risks or threats to health. Prevention activities are typically categorised in three levels. What is the aim of tertiary prevention? A. To reduce complications of disease B. To reduce incidence of disease C. To reduce overdiagnosis D. To reduce prevalence of disease
A
Primary: reduce incidence
Secondary: prevent progression, reduce overdiagnosis
Reduce prevalence: due to cure or death, can occur at secondary or tertiary levels
[PP]
In a clinical trial, 60 patients were assigned to the treatment group, 120 patients were assigned to the control group. By the end of the trial, 6 patients died among the 60 patients in the treatment group, and 24 died among the 120 patients in the control group. What is the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) to prevent one death? A. 1 B. 2 C. 10 D. 20
C
Absolute risk reduction = 0.1
[PP]
Multiple diagnostic tests are often required in clinical settings to diagnose a disease or a condition. Multiple tests can be performed in parallel or in series. In parallel testing, two or more tests are performed at the same time. When the tests results are negative, parallel testing helps to ‘rule out’ a disease aided by which of the following? A. Decrease in negative predictive value B. Increase in positive predictive value C. Increase in the sensitivity D. Increase in the specificity
C
Parallel testing: increase SN and NPV, but may increase false positives
Serial testing: increase SP and PPV, but may increase false negatives