East Anglia - Why the hunts ended? Flashcards
What are the 3 paragraphs for why the East Anglia Hunts ended?
- Growing cost
- Re-establishment of traditional authority
- Role of John Gaule
What evidence is there for the growing cost?
- Imprisonment was expensive (3 pence, per person, per day)
- Fees demanded by Hopkins (cost of him staying, 20 shillings per case)
What RC is there for the growing cost?
- Poor from civil war (inflation)
- Ship tax and weekly assessment
What was the impact of the growing cost?
- People stopped convicting subjects due to price
- John Stearne hunting ended (debts to him not paid back)
What was the link of growing costs?
- Witch hunting was no longer the priority
- Society’s attitudes were declining
What evidence is there for the re-establishment of traditional authority?
- 1646 Charles surrendered and East Anglia safe receive Assize court
- Royal gentry returned
What RC is there for the re-establishment of traditional authority?
- Church lost influence and were weak under Charles
- Trials were held by local magistrates
What was the impact of the re-establishment of traditional authority?
- Judges able to move around -> witches began to be acquitted
- People not as fearful as they once were (no need for scapegoats)
- 1646, 9 people pleaded not guilty
What link is there for the re-establishment of traditional authority?
- Changing social attitudes -> less support
- Influence from authorities cause sudden change
What evidence is there for the role of John Gaule?
- 1646, ‘Select cases of conscience touching witches and witchcraft’ :
Criticised methods of Hopkins/ Stearne
Witch hunters becoming idolatrous - Believed people’s own sins were to blame not witchcraft
What RC is there for the role of John Gaule?
Hopkins/ Stearne were liked due to speed and efficiency
What was the impact for the role of John Gaule
- Led to Hopkins being questioned
- Convinced authorities hunts were not needed
What link is there for the role of John Gaule?
- Tell us about the importance of Hopkins (death helped)
- Not widely accepted, not a widespread impact
- Changing attitudes among authorities