Easements, Licenses, and Covenants Flashcards
Easement:
The grant of a non-possessory property interest that entitles its holder to some form of use or enjoyment of another’s land, called the servient tenement.
The land that is subject to the easement is the servient estate, whereas the land that benefits from an easement on a servient estate is the dominant estate.
Easements by Grant:
An affirmative easement gives another the right to use the land for a specific purpose.
There are no specific language requirements necessary to grant an easement so long as the explicit grant clearly evidences the intent to grant the easement.
Easement by Reservation:
Created when a grantor conveys land but reserves an easement right in that land for his own use and benefit (and not for a third party).
Easements Appurtenant:
Easements are presumed to be appurtenant (i.e., tied to the land) unless there are clear facts to the contrary.
The benefits of an easement must correspond directly to the use and enjoyment of the possessor of the dominant estate (two parcels of land must be involved).
Easements In Gross:
If it was granted to benefit a particular person or commercial gain (as opposed to the land).
Only one parcel is involved (the servient tenement).
Express/Affirmative Easements & Types:
Arises when it is affirmatively created by the parties in a writing that is in compliance with the Statute of Frauds.
- Prescription
- Implication
- Necessity
- Grant
- Estoppel
Easements by Necessity:
An easement by necessity is generally created only when property is virtually useless (e.g., landlocked) without the benefit of an easement across neighboring property
Both the dominant and servient estates must have been under common ownership in the past and the necessity must have arisen at the time that the property was severed and the two estates were created.
The scope of an easement by necessity is limited to the nature and extent of the necessity, and is determined by the parties’ conduct.
Easement by Implication:
If an easement was previously used on the servient estate by an earlier owner, the court may find that the parties intended the easement to continue if the prior use was continuous, apparent (open and obvious), and reasonably necessary to the dominant land’s use and enjoyment (distinguish from an easement by necessity, which requires strict necessity).
Easements may also be implied without an existing use in a conveyance of lots sold in a subdivision with reference to a recorded plat or map that details streets leading to lots
Individuals who buy lots have an implied easement to be able to get to their lots that does not expire even if a public easement held by the city or county is vacated in the future.
A court will not grant an easement by implication if the petitioner has another reasonable means of accessing the property.
Quasi-Easement:
Because an owner cannot have an easement on his own land, this is considered a “quasi” easement.
The scope of a quasi easement is determined by the prior use that gave rise to the easement, but can change over time if the changes are reasonably foreseeable at the time of conveyance.
Easements by Prescription:
Easements can be obtained by prescription similarly to the way land can be acquired by adverse possession.
There must be continuous, actual, open, and hostile use for the statutory period (or 10 years).
Unlike adverse possession, the use need not be exclusive (such as a public easement to access a beach).
The scope of an easement by prescription is limited to the nature and extent of the adverse use.
Easements by Estoppel:
Good faith, reasonable detrimental reliance on permission by a servient estate holder may create an easement by estoppel to prevent unjust enrichment.
Distinguish this example from easement by prescription, which requires that the use be hostile (i.e., no permission was given).
To prove an easement by estoppel, there must be permission to use the property, plus detrimental reliance on that permission.
Negative Easements (Restrictive Covenants):
Prevents the owner from using land in particular ways.
To be valid, a negative easement must be expressly created by a writing signed by the grantor and it is typically recognized only in relation to restricting use of light, air, support, or stream water from an artificial flow (only appurtenant).
No natural or automatic right to a negative easement.
Easement Appurtenant (Transfer):
An easement appurtenant is transferred with the land to which it relates.
Consequently, the benefit is transferred automatically with the transfer of the dominant estate, and the burden likewise is transferred automatically with the transfer of the servient estate.
Easement in Gross (Transfer):
Traditionally, an easement in gross could not be transferred, but most courts now look to the intent of the parties to determine whether the parties intended only the holder of the easement in gross to enjoy the right, in which case it is not transferable, or whether the parties intended the holder to be able to transfer it.
Easements in gross are not divisible without the consent of all parties holding an interest.
A non-exclusive easement may not be divided up, but an exclusive easement may be.
However, the division of an exclusive easement in gross is subject to the one-stock rule.
Under this rule, the use that the transferees make of the easement collectively is limited by the use that the transferor made of the easement (i.e., his “stock”).
Commercial easements in gross are transferable and assignable.
Easement Terminations:
END CRAMPSS
- Estoppel
- Necessity
- Destruction
- Condemnation
- Release
- Abandonment
- Merger (Unity of Ownership)
- Prescription
- Severance
- Sale to a Bona Fide Purchaser