Easements Flashcards
Definition of an easement
Property rights annexed to land - incorporeal hereditaments, whereby one landowner enjoys rights over the land of a neighbour
What 3 stage process do you need to identify an easement
- is it capable of being an easement. 2. Has it been acquired as of right. 3. What’s the effect on third parties
What case shows whether something’s capable of being an easement
Ellenborough Park: 1. There must be a dominant and servient tenement at the time of the grant. 2. There must be different owners. 3. The easement must accomodate the servient land (not just the owner). 4. Must lie in grant
What case shows that the dom and serv tenements must be identifiable at the time of grant
London & Blenheim estates - dominant land was not sufficiently identified
When was a right a licence only because it benefited the owner, not the land
Hill v Tupper - pleasure oats on a canal
When was an advert on a neighbouring property an easement because it benefited the land
Moody v Steggles - land was a purpose-built pub
When was an easement only for the identified dominant tenement, not for land lying beyond
Peacock v Custin
What does “must lie in grant” mean
Grantor and grantee must have legal capacity (an estate in land). Must be defined and definable (subject matter sufficiently clear)
View not capable of being the subject matter of a grant
William Alfred’s case
TV signal not capable of constituting an easement
Hunter v Canary Wharf
Airflow not sufficiently clear subject matter
Bryant v le Fevre
Airflow to a defined aperture IS sufficiently capable of being a grant
Cable v Bryant
The right to store coal in a defined area of a shed does not amount to exclusive possession
Wright v Macadam
Storage in a neighbour’s cellar woudl amount to exclusive possession - easement not recogmised
Grigsby v Melville
Use of a shared loo = easement, not exclusive possession
Miller v Emcer Products