Easements Flashcards

1
Q

Definition of an easement

A

Property rights annexed to land - incorporeal hereditaments, whereby one landowner enjoys rights over the land of a neighbour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What 3 stage process do you need to identify an easement

A
  1. is it capable of being an easement. 2. Has it been acquired as of right. 3. What’s the effect on third parties
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What case shows whether something’s capable of being an easement

A

Ellenborough Park: 1. There must be a dominant and servient tenement at the time of the grant. 2. There must be different owners. 3. The easement must accomodate the servient land (not just the owner). 4. Must lie in grant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What case shows that the dom and serv tenements must be identifiable at the time of grant

A

London & Blenheim estates - dominant land was not sufficiently identified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When was a right a licence only because it benefited the owner, not the land

A

Hill v Tupper - pleasure oats on a canal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When was an advert on a neighbouring property an easement because it benefited the land

A

Moody v Steggles - land was a purpose-built pub

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When was an easement only for the identified dominant tenement, not for land lying beyond

A

Peacock v Custin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does “must lie in grant” mean

A

Grantor and grantee must have legal capacity (an estate in land). Must be defined and definable (subject matter sufficiently clear)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

View not capable of being the subject matter of a grant

A

William Alfred’s case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

TV signal not capable of constituting an easement

A

Hunter v Canary Wharf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Airflow not sufficiently clear subject matter

A

Bryant v le Fevre

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Airflow to a defined aperture IS sufficiently capable of being a grant

A

Cable v Bryant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The right to store coal in a defined area of a shed does not amount to exclusive possession

A

Wright v Macadam

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Storage in a neighbour’s cellar woudl amount to exclusive possession - easement not recogmised

A

Grigsby v Melville

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Use of a shared loo = easement, not exclusive possession

A

Miller v Emcer Products

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Car parking between 8am and 6pm on an industrial = exclusive possession - no easement

A

Batchelor v Marlow

17
Q

Car parking can be an easement subject to 2 provisos

A

Moncrieff v Jamieson: Necessary for the comfortable use and enjoyment of land and no undue burden for servient owner

18
Q

An easement can’t oblige the servient landowner to spend money

A

Jones v Price

19
Q

Look to the intention of the parties to see whether they meant it to be a licence or an easement

A

IDC v Clark: Deed referred to the grant of a licence

20
Q

3 ways that an easement can be acquired

A
  1. Express grant/reservation. 2. Implied grant/reserbation. 3. Presumed grant/reservation
21
Q

Legal requirements for express grant

A

Deed + Registration

22
Q

Requirements for equitable grant of an easement

A

Writing

23
Q

Ways which an easement can be implied

A
  1. Neccessity 2. Common intent 3. Wheeldon v Burrows 4. S62 LPA 1925
24
Q

When wil an easement be implied for neccessity

A

Must be absolutely neccessary for the transaction to work at all

25
Q

A case where an easement wasn’t implied for neccessity/access

A

Nickerson v Barraclough

26
Q

An implied reservation is not allowed merely to overcome inconvenience

A

Re Dodd - implied RESERVATION v difficult to make out

27
Q

When will an easement be implied for common intention

A

Where both parties had a common intention as to the use of the land and an easement is required to give effect top that intention

28
Q

A case where an easement was implied for common intention

A

Wong v Beaumont - both knew purpose was a restaurant, implied easement for ventilation

29
Q

When will a court imply an easement under the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows

A

ON FIRST SPLIT where 1. continuous and apparent (eg a well worn path) AND/OR 2. neccessary for the enjoyment of the land (eg a sewer) PLUS 3. previously used by the owners entirely for the benefit of the land granted

30
Q

Express grant of a lesser easement does not prevent a larger easement being granted under Wheeldon v Burrows

A

Millman v Elliss

31
Q

When will an easement be implied under S62 LPA 1925

A

Where there is prior diversity of occupation. Turns a licence into an easement. Creates LEGAL easements only.

32
Q

Example of a rigjht being converted to an easement upon renewal of lease

A

Wright v Macadam (coal in shed)

33
Q

Case where a licence to use the front door during negotiations was converted to an easement upon crystallisation of teh lease

A

Goldberg v Edwards

34
Q

What case confused the boundaries between Wheeldon v Burrows and S62 and how

A

Platt v Crouch: Easement allowed where continuous & apparent (WvB) and no prior diversity (WvB) BUT it was a personal right (S62)

35
Q

What act should you not forget as an alternative when answering an easements quiestion

A

Access to Neighbouring Land Act 1992