Easements 2 (Reservation of E) Flashcards
Reservation of easement
If someone has reserved an easement, then the land they have sold is burdended bevause the seller is retaining / reserving some kind of use /easement over the sold property for themselves
Reservation of an E - EXPRESS
can be created expressly by deed
Reservation of an E - IMPLIED
NECESSITY
COMMON INTENTION
Necessity
Sweet v Sommer 2004
> was retained land landlocked where access was possibly be demolishing a building on the sellers retained land? Court said demolishing a buildinf to facilitate access is NOT necessary
Adealon Proprietary LTD v Merton LBC 2007
> An easement of necessity where some of the surrounding land belongs to a third party? Court said they should argued to try and make some sort of easement to go through the 3rd party’s land BEFORE going for an easement of necessity over the sellers retained land
Common Intention - Peckham v Ellison 2000
Local Authorities sold a No.15 building to Rich HOWEVER authorities did not expressly reserve a right of way of no.15
Authorities sold no.16 to Ellison
No.15 was sold by Rich to Peckham and Peckham’s argued that there was this right of way
Court said on these special facts they granted an easement here but are relaxing any rules or setting an precedence
Enforceability of easements - Transferring the benefit and burden of existing easements
Sale of dominant tenement = benefit has to move
Sale of servient tenement = burden has to move
Transfering the benefit of an exisiting easement to new dominant owner
s.62 will move and convey easement with land
s.62 applies to both grants and reservations in the context of enforceability only
Transfering the burden of existing easement to new servient owner
If its an EXPRESS easement then it capable of being legal, created via document and s.27 then kicks and requires it to be registered –> AND if it is registered it would bind the new servient owner because it would appear on the charges register
HOWEVER if its and IMPLIED easement then it can be an overriding interest under schedule 3 para 3 of LRA 2002 –> thus it won’t be binding