Easements Flashcards
What is an easement?
An easement is a proprietary right to use land which belongs to somebody else.
The use is more limited than an exclusive right to occupy or use.
When is an easement capable of being a legal interest in land?
When its duration is equivalent to either a leasehold duration or a freehold’s duration (ie forever)
When will an easement only be equitable?
When it is not granted for the duration equivalent to a freehold or leasehold estate
When will an easement be positive?
When it allows the holder to use the servient land in a particular way eg
- a right of way
- right of drainage
- right to park
When will an easement be negative?
When they do not involve entering the neighbouring land as the right conferred can be enjoyed from the holder’s land
What rights should not be confused with easements even though they may have similar characteristics?
- quasi-easements
- public rights
- licences
- profits a prendre
- restrictive covenants
What are quasi-easements?
Where landowners use things on their own land that may become easements if the land were ever to be divided such as an access route to a house
What are profits a prendre?
A right to take things from the land, such as produce, animals, fish, or minerals
What are the two main ways an easement can be created?
- by grant - happens where landowner sells or leases part of their land and gives to the buyer/tenant an easement over the land which they have retained
- reservation - exists where a landowner sells or leases part of their land to a buyer/tenant and retains a right over the land sold or leased
Is a reservation to be construed strictly or widely? And why?
Strictly because they are in a position to reserve exactly what is required and are assumed to have done so. Any attempt by seller/landlord to extend the right will fail.
When will an easement be created by prescription?
- there has been regular use for at least 20 years
- that use as been as a right:
(i) without force
(ii) without secrecy
(iii) without permission of landowner
What would constitute force so defeat creation of easement by prescription?
Ignoring signs or protests from servient land owner
What would constitute secrecy so defeat creation of easement by prescription?
If the use of the purported easement could not reasonably have been discovered.
Right must be used openly
What three things must be considered when assessing whether a right is an easement?
- the right must fulfil the capability requirements in re Ellenborough Park
- the right must not be prevented from being an easement by a disqualifying factor
- the right must have been acquired as an easement, either expressly, impliedly or by prescription
What four factors must be present for a right to be capable of being an easement per Re Ellenborough Park?
- there must be a dominant and servient tenement
- the right must accommodate the dominant tenement
- there must be diversity of ownership
- the right must lie in grant
What is meant by the requirement that there must be a dominant and servient tenement re the test in Re Ellenborough Park?
There must be two identifiable pieces on land - one which benefits from the exercise of the right and one which is burdened by it.
The right must not be exercised by the holder independently of the land otherwise it is licence or personal right.
What is meant by the right must accommodate the dominant tenement re the test in Re Ellenborough Park?
The right must have some beneficial impact on the dominant tenement
Useful questions to ask are:
- does the right benefit any owner of the land?
- does it cease to be of use once the dominant owner has parted with the land?
- does the right make the dominant land a better or more convenient property?
- does the right add value or amenity to the dominant land?
What is meant by the right must lie in grant re the test in Re Ellenborough Park?
- The person who grants the right must have the power to do so, they must be over 18 and own the legal estate
- the grantee must also be capable eg not possible to grant in favour of large group such as residents of a village
- the nature and extent of the right must be clear enough to be enforced by the courts
- the right should be of nature generally recognised by the courts
Can there ever be new types of easements ie ones not previously recognised by the court?
Yes as long as not negative in nature.
Law open to developing by analogy
What happens if a right satisfies the test in re Ellenborough Park but there is a disqualifying factor?
Then not a right
What are the three disqualifying factors?
- the exercise of the right must not amount to exclusive possession of the servient tenement
- the exercise of the right by the dominant owner must not involve additional, unavoidable expenditure by the servient owner
- the exercise of the right must not depend on permission being given by the servient owner
Why will exclusive possession by the dominant owner disqualify any potential right from being an easement?
The use by the dominant owner is too intense - easements are only meant to be limited rights
What is ouster principle test for determining if a right amounts to exclusive possession so therefore not an easement?
If the servient owner has been deprived of all reasonable use then cannot be an easement
What is the possession and control test for determining if a right amounts to exclusive possession so therefore not an easement?
Ask whether the servient owner still retains ultimate possession and control of the servient land, subject to reasonable exercise of the right