Early Years Flashcards
Week 2
Understand what social cognitions are
‘Cognitive processes and structures that influence and are influenced by social behaviour’ (Hogg & Vaughan, 2017)
- Stereotypes
- Heuristics
- Impression formation
- Schemas
- Attributions
Week 2
Discuss how people form impressions
- Asch’s configuration model
- Central traits
- Peripheral traits
- Biases
- Primacy & recency (order of presented info)
- Positivity and negativity
- Implicit personality theories (certain characteristics combine to form specific types of personality)
Week 2
Identify schemas and employ them in all social interactions
- Cognitive structures
- Set of interrelated cognitions
- Allow us to quickly make sense/form impressions/make judgements with limited information
Types
- Content-free schemas
- Event schemas / scripts
- Role schemas
- Person schemas
- Self-schemas
(Week 2
Heuristics)
- Cognitive short-cuts
- Anchors and adjustment (inferences are tied to initial standards/schemas) - Strack, Martin & Schwartz (1988)
- Availability - frequency/likelihood of an event is based on how quickly instances/associations come to mind
- Representativeness - instances are categorised on the bases of overall similarity
(Week 2
Categories and Prototypes)
Categories
- Used to apply schematic knowledge
- Hierarchies of categories
Protoypes
- Cognitive representation of the typical/ideal defining features of a category
(Week 2
Stereotypes)
- Widely shared and simplified generalisations of a social group and its members
- Central aspects of prejudice and discimination
- Difficult to change
How do we create stereotypes?
- Tajfel (1957, 1959) - it’s because of a process of categorisation - accentuation principle
- Categorisation accentuates perceived similarities within and differences between groups
- Effect is amplified when categorisation has subjective importance
Studying Stereotypes
- Content of specific stereotypes is important:
- Analysis of the content of stereotypes provides evidence of different kinds of prejudice - Cuddy et al., 2008 model
Stereotype Content Model SCM
1 Perceived competition, status
2 Warmth, competence
3 Contempt, envy, pity, admiration
4 Facilitative, active, passive, harmful
(Week 2
Actor-Observer Effect)
- Attribute own and others’ behaviour differently
- Own = externally, others’ = internally
Reasons
1. Perceptual focus
- Actor & observer have different perspectives on the behaviour, so interpret accordingly
2. Informational differences
- Actor can draw on previous knowledge about their behaviour, observer cannot
Depends upon:
- Specific causal factor involved
- Individuals’ history in a given situation
- Individual differences
(Week 2
Self-Serving Bias, Self-Handicapping & Belief in a ‘Just World’
Self-Serving Bias
- Distortions that protect our self-esteem/self-concept
- Attribute positives to internal factors
- Blame environment for failure
- Internal, stable, global attributions to positive events (Miller & Ross, 1975)
- Ego-serving
Self-Handicapping
- Setting up excuses that we can later use if we do poorly on a task
- If you fail, you have a built in excuse
- If you succeed, you’re that much better
- To protect self-esteem (Berglas & Jones, 1978)
- To preserve of enhance self-concept (Leary & Kowalski, 1990)
- To convince oneself and others that the person is a good person & in control (Higgins & Snyder, 1990)
Belief in a ‘Just World’
- Tendency to believe that the world is a just place - people get what they deserve and deserve what they get
- Illusion of control - belief of more control over our world than is true
- E.g., hard work reaps rewards, bad things happen to bad people
- Makes us feel secure
- Victims seen as responsible
- Can regain control by taking some responsibility
Week 2 Tutorial
Examine how people make attributions
- Theory of Naive Psychology (Heider, 1958)
- Study of people’s naive/common-sense psychological theories
- Based on three principles:
- Behaviour is motivated
- We identify stable and enduring properties of the world
- We differentiate between personal (internal) and environmental (external) causalities - Covariation Model (Kelley, 1967)
- People are like scientists - they identify a factor that covaries with behaviour, then assign a causal role
- To make a judgement, people assess three classes of information:
- Consistency - consistent over time, high/low
- Distinctiveness - respond similarly to other stimuli, high/low
- Consensus - similar responses from others, high/low
- E.g.,
- Co-occurrence of action - nervousness
- Specific person - student
- Cause - lecturer
- Does the student always get nervous? Does the student get nervous about anything related to the lecturer or only during teaching? Does everyone get nervous or only this student? - Attributional Theory (Weiner, 1979, 1984, 1985)
- Success/failure leads us to make an attribution based upon three performance dimensions: - Stability (success/failure is fairly permanent/unstable)
- Locus of causality (factor is external/internal to individual)
- Controllability (factor is/is not under individual’s control)
Week 2 Studies
van der Zanden et al., 2022
Strack, Martin & Shwartz (1988)
Cuddy et al., 2008
Tutorial
- Napolitan & Goathals (1979)
- Ross et al., 1977
- Martin & Carron (2012)
Week 3
Introduce cognitive development
- Theory first proposed by Piaget
- How a child learns to think, reason and use language
Child Development
- Physical
- Linguistic
- Emotional
- Psychosocial
- Cognitive
(Week 3
To describe Piaget’s stage theory of cognitive development)
- Constructivist - child has an active role in their own development
Key Aspects
- Schemas
- Adaptation
- Assimiliation
- Accommodation
- Equilibrium / disequilibrium
Stages
- Invariable & universal
1. Sensori-motor (birth to 18/24 months)
- Learn through senses & reflexes
- Manipulate materials
- Thought and language begins
- Object permanence:
- 4 months: no attempt to search for hidden object
- 4-9 months: visual search for object
- >9 months: search for & retrieve hidden object
2. Pre-operational (18/24 months to 7 years)
- Ideas based on perception
- Over-generalise based on limited experience
- Centration - focus on one variable at a time
- Fail conservation tasks
- Egocentrism
- Rigidity of thought
- More imaginative play
- Display animism
- Limited social cognition
3. Concrete operational (7/8 years to 11/12 years)
- Form ideas based on reasoning
- Limit thinking to objects & familiar events
- Can conserve
4. Formal operational (11/12 years onwards)
- Think conceptually
- Think hypothetically
- Abstract thought
- Applying logic
- Advanced problem solving
Week 3
To consider and evaluate Piaget’s stage theory of cognitive development
- Involves changes in cognitive developmental areas
- Spatial cognition
- Conservation
- Appearance-reality distinction
- Class inclusion
- Transitive inferences
- Perspective taking
Implications for Education
- Child-centred learning
- Children can only learn when ready and at right stage of cognitive development
Criticism
1. Experimental concerns
- Three mountains
- Conservation tasks
- May have underestimated children’s abilities
- E.g., Gelman (1982) - turtle conservation task
- Language
- Potentially problematic in conservation tasks
- Issue of language difficulties & question order (e.g., Donaldson, 1978; Rose & Blank, 1974)
- Social concerns
- Social situation of conservation tasks: ‘naughty teddy’ (McGarrigle & Donaldson, 1974)
- Light, Buckingham & Robins (1979)
- Object permanence - method of removal important (Bower & Wishart, 1972)
- A-not-B Task
- (Diamond, 1991): Other reason children may fail:
- Memory - children forget
- Preservation:
- Motor preservation: repeat movements
- Capture error: use a once-successful solution
- Have competence, lack performance skills
- (Diamond, 1991): Other reason children may fail:
- Task Complexity
- Martin Hughes - concerns about difficulty of three mountains task
- Redone as policeman/boy experiment, young children able to do it
- Theoretical concerns
Piaget Critiques
/ Inspirational insights into cognitive development
X Lack of detail about participants or success rates
X Fails to explain WHY transition occurs
X Overlooks cultural factors involved in change
Week 3
To consider Piaget’s legacy
- Comprehensive theory - intellectual development from birth to adulthood
- Interaction between individual level of maturation and environment that offers right experiences
- Impact was delayed
- Explanations were challenged
Week 3 Tutorial
Discuss theoretical issues with Piaget’s work
Week 3 Tutorial
Compare Piaget’s work against the work of Vygotsky and Bruner
Vygotsky
- Devised a socio-cultural theory of development
- Culture is crucial - personal and social experience can not be separated
- Development driven by social interactions & learning from others
- ZPD - distance between actual developmental level and level of potential development through adult guidance
Bruner
- Developed and extensively tested Vygotsky’s ideas
- Role of scaffolding/child-centred learning
Scaffolding
- In practce (Wood et al., 1976)
1. Recruitment
2. Reduction of degrees of freedom
3. Direction maintenance
4. Marking critical features
5. Demonstration
Implications for Education
- Scaffolding to assist children in learning (ZPD)
- Joint construction of knowledge - ‘collaborative learning’
- Importance of language
Week 4
Introduce the topic of attachment
- ‘Deep-seated emotional tie that one individual forms with another’ - Ainsworth, 1979
Importance
- Security (Ainsworth, Bowlby)
- Protect children from danger (Bowlby)
Signs of Attachment
1. Proximity to caregiver
2. Distress on separation
3. Happy on reunion
4. Orient actions to caregiver
- Attachment evident at 7-9 months; fear of strangers
Week 4
Look at what attachment is and consider its importance
Assumptions of Attachment Theory
- Parent plays central role in child’s development
- Cognitive sensori-motor skills necessary for attachment, e.g. object permanence
- Learning in social interactions is important
Bowlby’s Phases of Attachment (1969)
1. No discrimination in orientation/signals
2. Preferential people - smile, comforted by caregiver (5-7 months)
3. Preferential proximity to discriminated person (7-9 months), attachment
4. Goal-corrected partnership - caregiver’s & child’s needs (2-3 years)
5. Lessening attachment (proximity) - trust, affection (school age onwards)
Who are attachments formed with?
- Previously believed to be only with mother
- But there is evidence of multiple attachments
- Qualities of caregiver important
- Schaffer & Emerson (1964) - Study of Separation Project:
- 7-9 months: 29% + 1 attachment figure
- 18 months: 87% + 1 attachment figure
- 33% of infants had strongest attachment to someone other than the mother - e.g., father, sibling, grandparents
Week 4
Consider issues raised by attachment theory and the wider implications
Limitations
- Cultural and individual differences
- Bowlby: attachment as a lifespan construct
- However, attachment is often not assessed beyond infancy
- Newer work assesses attachment in pre-school, school ago, and adult populations
Issues Raised
1. Role of mother or other caregivers
2. Childcare and attachment
3. Attachment beyond infancy
Wider Implications
- Early entrance to childcare:
- Belksy (1988) - 20+ hours per week of non-maternal care in 1st year -> insecure attachment patterns, less compliance, more aggression
- Clarke-Stewart (1991) - better intellectual and social development than those in home care
- Other studies: no evidence of differences in attachment (e.g., Scarr, 1998)
- Character of mother(/father) is crucial
- Childcare quality is more important than quantity - benefit of quality childcare can offset poor parenting
Implications of Attachment Types
- Attachment type can predict other types of development
- Kochanska (2001) - Infants studied from 9-33 months
- Assessed in laboratory episodes aimed to elicit fear, anger or joy
- Avoidant (A) - more fearful
- Secure (B) - less fear, anger and distres
- Ambivalent (C) - less joyful
- Disorganised (D) - more angry
- Further benefits aged 10-15 (Sroufe et al., 2005)
Adult Attachment
- Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) - George, Kaplan & Main (1985)
- Semi-structured interview, widely used
- Classifications:
- Dismissing (A)
- Autonomous/secure (B)
- Preoccupied/enmeshed (C)
- Unresolved mourning/loss (D)
Week 4
Introduce the topic of deprivation and consider its importance
‘Maternal Deprivation’ Hypothesis
1. Critical period for attachment formation
2. Observable distress when child separated from mother
3. Developmental delays in institutionalised children
4. Harlow’s isolated rhesus monkeys
5. Delinquency in children who had undergone a ‘separation experience’
- Now generally disputed
- Induced guilt in working mothers
- Positive effects
/ Improvements in institutional care
/ Increase in fostering of children
/ Easier parent access to children in hospital
Week 4
Review key studies of deprivation
Harlow’s Rhesus Monkeys
- Harlow, 1959
- Isolated 8 newborn monkeys from mother
- Put in cage with 2 surrogate mothers (1 cloth, 1 wire) - 4 fed by wire mother, 4 fed by cloth mother
- 165 days with surrogate mothers
- All monkeys clung to cloth mother for support
- Those kept isolated- socially inept (deprivation: Harlow & Harlow, 1962)
Week 5
Introduce basic components of language
- Symbolic communication
- Rule-governed
- Conventional, arbitrary
- Social
- Intellectual
- Doesn’t have to be spoken
- Written language
- Sign language
Phonology (Sounds)
- Perception & production of sounds used in language
- Phonemes - smallest unit of sound
- E.g., /b/, /p/, /a/
- Speech is a continuous stream
- Vocal apparatus can produce 100s
- Rules govern combination (Chomsky & Halle, 1968)
- Can’t produce
- Aren’t produced (language specific - e.g., rz / dz)
Orthography (Letters)
- Graphemes - smallest unit of text
- Letter(s) correspond to phenomes, but not 1-to-1
- Rules for combination:
- Corresponding to phonology
- Specifically orthographic rules
- E.g., adding ‘-e’: mat -> mate
Semantics (Meaning)
- Morphemes - smallest meaningful unit
- [dog][s] - free noun, bound plural suffix
- Words - multiple meanings - e.g., roll
- Phrases and sentences:
- Grammar and syntax
- S - V - O
Pragmatics (Non-Linguistic)
- Considers communicative function
- Adjusting language for context
- Speech, writing - text vs academic essays/emails
- Social conventions - e.g., turn-taking
- Perspective taking
- Intonation and prosody
Week 5
Understand how language develops
Prelinguistic
- Newborn
- Reflexive vocalisations
- 1 month
- Discriminate virtually all phonemes
- Different smiles
- 2-3 months
- Coo, smile, laugh
- 4-6 months
- Babbling, echolalia
- Cross-culturally similar sounds and ages
- Pragmatics - joint attention & turn-taking
- 6-9 months
- Canonical babbling
- Reduplicated babbling
- 9-12 months
- Modulated babbling
- Infant begins taking active role (Reddy, 1999)
- Dyadic -> triadic interaction
- Meaningful gesture
- Pointing from 8 months
- Comprehension of simple instructions
First Words
- Comprehension precedes production
- Phonologically consistent forms
- First conventional word around 1 year
- Predictable semantic categories (Dromi, 1999; Nelson, 1981)
- Vocabulary development
- Initially very slow: 1-3 words per month
- 18-24 months: 10-20 words per week (Fenson et al., 1994)
- 6 years = 15,000 words
Sentences
- Grammar
- Holophrases: 12-18 months (Tomasello, 1995)
- 2 word utterances: 1.5-2.5 years (Bloom, 1998)
- 3 word utterances: 2-3 years
- Logical errors -> knowledge of grammar
-> Over-regularisation, e.g., ‘deers’
- Playing with language - e.g., rhyming
- 4-5 years: most grammatical constructions
Week 5
Identify popular theories of language development, and highlight their limitations
Interactionist
- Behaviourist (e.g., Skinner) + Nativist (e.g., Chomsky)
- Nativists (e.g., Chomsky, 1957; Pinker, 1994)
- Only human, virtually all humans
- Cross-cultural similarities, universal grammar
- Innate capacity, explicit teaching unnecessary
- ‘Language Acquisition Device’ (Chomsky)
- Behaviourists (e.g., Skinner ,1957)
- Different languages, dialects, accents
- Imitation and reinforcement