E. Hearsay Flashcards

1
Q

What is Hearsay?*

A

1) Oral/Written out-of-court statement

2) Offered for truth of matters they assert

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When may Hearsay be received into evidence?*

A

1) Exception applies

2) Proponent demonstrates reliability of evidence
- Declaration spoken under circumstances rendering it highly probable that it is truthful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Admission?*

A

1) Party’s act/declaration
- Party’s Silence/Equivocation + NOT refuting it => Admission by Silence allowed

2) Constitutes evidence vs himself at trial

NO actual knowledge required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is required for Employee’s/Agent’s hearsay statement to be admissible against own Employer (as Admission)?*

A

Statement was made within scope of Employee’s/Agent’s authority
- On behalf of Employer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the difference of admissibility of Admission between NY and Federal Rules?

A

NY rules
- Admissible under hearsay exceptions

Federal rules
- Admissible as non-hearsay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is required for Present Sense Impressions to be admissible?*

A

1) Statement describes/explains event/condition

2) Made while/Immediately after Declarant was perceiving event/condition (personal knowledge)
- ‘Marginal time lag’ between event + description allowed!!!

3) Content is corroborated by independent proof
- Must serve to support statements’ substance + content

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is required for Hospital Records to be admissible?

A

Information relates to Patient’s diagnosis/prognosis/treatment

Information helps in understanding medical/surgical aspects of hospitalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is required for Business Record to be admissible to prove truth of its contents?

A

1) Made in regular course of any business
2) Made in regular course of SUCH business
3) At time of act recorded/after reasonable time

4) Record Maker either;
- Had actual knowledge of act (otherwise affects weight, NOT admissibility)
- Received info from someone within business who had actual knowledge + under ‘business duty’ to report info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is required if secondary evidence is NOT available?

A

Original records

Copies/Reproductions
- If copies were prepared in regular course of business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Are electronic records admissible?

A

Yes

  • Electronic records
  • Electronic signatures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is required for Witness’ former trial testimony to be used to contradict/impeach Witness in subsequent testimony?

A

1) Former trial involved same parties + same subject matter

2) Court finds either;
- W is NOT available (death/age/sickness/infirmity/imprisonment)
- W is +100 miles from trial location/out of state
- Party procured diligent efforts BUT attendance NOT procurable
- Exceptional circumstances make its use desirable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is required for Party’s former trial testimony to be admissible as evidence-in-chief?

A

1) Testimony offered by party ‘adversely interested’

2) Person is (at time of testimony);
- Officer
- Director
- Member
- Employee
- Agent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When may Physician’s prior testimony be admissible?

A

Admission is NOT prejudicial under circumstances

NO need to show unavailability/special circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When may Witness’ prior criminal trial testimony be admissible at subsequent proceeding?

A

Witness, at time of subsequent proceeding, is either;

  • NOT able to attend (death/illness/incapacity)
  • NOT discoverable (by due diligence)
  • Outside State/In Federal Custody + NOT discoverable (by due diligence)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is required for Excited Utterance to be admissible?*

A

1) Statement ‘spontaneously’ made
2) By Participant/Witness/Bystander in event
3) Based on actual knowledge

4) Under stress of nervous excitement resulting from startling event
- UNLESS other activities during that time contradict otherwise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly