Dyslexia Flashcards
What are the prominent theories of developmental dyslexia?
Phonological deficit hypothesis (Snowling, 1998)
Magnocellular hypothesis (Stein, 2001)
Cerebellar deficit hypothesis (Nicolson & Fawcett, 1990)
What are the main assumptions of the Phonological Deficit Hypothesis?
- Suggests individuals have difficulties establishing, storing, and accessing adequate phonological representations
- Children with dyslexia perform poorly on tests that involve phonological awareness
- Rhyme (MacLean et al., 1987)
- Aliteration (Bryant et al., 1990)
- Repeating nonsense words (Snowling, 1981)
- Rapid picture naming (Denckla and Rudel, 1976)
- Word segmentation (Snowling et al., 1986)
What have neuroimaging studies on the phonological deficit found?
- Differences in language areas of the brain
- Habib (2000) - reviewed 14 neuroimaging studies of dyslexia and concluded that key deficit was a phonological one
What are the main assumptions of the Magnocellular Deficit Hypothesis?
- Explanation at the biological level suggesting that the magnocellular is impaired
- Magnocellular pathway carries information from large retinal ganglion cells through LGN to visual cortex
- This pathway helps control eye movements and is sensitive to motion - it is crucial in the direction of visual attention
What have neuroimaging studies on the magnocellular deficit found?
- Neuroimaging has suggested magnocellular abnormalities in the LGN in dyslexic individuals
- Mechanism thought to depend on rapid dynamics of neuronal ion channels in turn dependent on normal processing of essential fatty acids
What are the auditory assumptions of the magnocellular deficit?
- However, there are also magnocellular regions within the auditory pathway - dysfunction here would lead to an impaired ability to pick up changes in sound frequency and amplitude
- This may explain both the visual and auditory deficits in dyslexics
- In both cases the impairment is one of temporal resolution
- Wolff (1993) - children with dyslexia show deficits on timing tasks
What are the main assumptions of the Cerebellar Deficit Hypothesis?
- This proposes that dyslexic individuals display a difficulty in automatising tasks
- Theory proposed due to the observation that the balance of children with dyslexia were poorer than that of controls when a 2nd task was introduced (dual-tasking) - It was concluded that dyslexic children had difficulties with the automatisation of the primary task, so the 2nd task ‘overloaded’ the processing capacity
- Nicolson and Fawcett (1990) argue that the difficulties with reading and spelling may be due to a general inability to automatise skills
- To account for this they propose an underlying low level impairment of the cerebellum - try to find level of explanation at both cognitive and biological levels
- Tested children with dyslexia on a range of motor tasks and found they were generally impaired on these
What have neuroimaging studies on the cerebellar deficit found?
- Finch, Nicolson and Fawcett (2002) - found abnormalities in the cerebellar of dyslexic individuals
- Rae et al (1998) - metabolic abnormalities in this area
What are the main points when evaluating the Phonological Deficit Hypothesis?
- Identifies underlying cognitive deficit as difficulties with phonological representations
- Some studies have found poor phonological awareness in all participants - appears to be a ‘core deficit’
- Makes no claims about the cause of the problem so lacks explanatory power at Morton/Friths biological level- leaves open the possibility that different biological deficits could underpin the cognitive one
- Intervention cannot target any underlying cause but can address the cognitive deficit
- Programme would be based on improving phonological representation
- This type of training is increasingly found in school intervention programmes
What are the main points when evaluating the Magnocellular Deficit Hypothesis?
- Suggests a visuo-spatial processing deficit (and possibly auditory one) due to magnocellular impairment - explanatory power at both the cognitive and biological level
- May link to specific problems of visual resolution found in Irlen syndrome
- Leads to impairment in temporal processing
- NB - Magnocellular deficits seen in only a small subset of dyslexic individuals (Ramus et al., 2003)
- Conversely, Skoyles and Skutton (2004) note that there are probably more individuals without dyslexia who have a magnocellular deficit than individuals with dyslexia
- Throws doubt on the notion of a magnocellular deficit as an underlying cause of dyslexia
What are some possible interventions for Magnocellular deficit dyslexia?
- Training in temporal processing
- Overy (2003) reports that the use of singing and rhythm games with children with dyslexia - Show improvements in phonological skills and spelling but not reading
- Essential Fatty Acids supplement
- Cyhlarova et al (2007) reading ability correlated with fatty acid metabolism in adults with and without dyslexia
What are the main points when evaluating the Cerebellar Deficit Hypothesis?
- Involved in balance, sequence learning, timing, implicit learning, anticipation of error
- Overall, the cerebellum seems specialised for associative learning
Is the cerebellum involved in speech?
Neuroimaging suggest that it is -
- FMRI studies show that different areas of the cerebellum are activated in different verbal tasks even though motor tasks are similar (Fulbright et al., 1999)
- Cerebellar damage affects phonemic but not semantic rule performance - tested by asking patients to generate as many words as possible beginning with a specific letter as opposed to as many as possible in specific categories (Leggio et al., 2000)
- So impairment of the cerebellum seems like a potential candidate for an underlying biological deficit in dyslexia
What do Fawcett and Nicolson suggest?
Fawcett and Nicolson suggest that dyslexic children exhibit difficulties reminiscent of adults with cerebellar deficits’
- Difficulties with temporal estimation
- Balance
- Muscle tone
- Coordination
Evaluation and Research
- A number of studies have failed to demonstrate much support for the cerebellar deficit hypothesis and many authors are dubious about the conclusions drawn by proponents of the theory
- Pope (2004) 53 dyslexic boys and control - and found any cerebellar impairment could equally be attributed to ADHD symptoms
- Wimmer et al (1999) - Balance impairments only found in children with comorbid ADHD
- Ramus et al (2003) investigated 3 theories with 16 dyslexics and found;
- 16 suffered from phonological deficit
- 5 ONLY from phonological deficit
- 10 from an auditory deficit
- 4 from a motor deficit
- 2 from visual magnocellular deficit
- The motor problems that were found did not look particularly ‘cerebellar’ in origin
- Bishop (2002) - suggest 2 other possibilities;
- Cerebellar deficit might be a non specific marker for neurodevelopment abnormality
- Cerebellar deficit may be a consequence, not a cause of dyslexia