DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY Flashcards
DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY
Applies…
L must….
L has a duty of confidentiality to C and must not reveal any info’ relating to the representation of a C, regardless of the source, unless some exception applies.
The duty of Confidentiality applies to all information relating to the representaiotn of the C regardless of when or where it was acquired, regardless of whether the C asked for it to be kept in confidence, and regardless of whether revealing it might harm or embarrass the C.
Also applies to info’ of former Cs and info gained during consultations with prospective Cs.
L must take reasonable measures to prevent unauthorized access to, or inadvertent disclosure of, the C’s CI.
WHEN CI MAY BE DISCLOSED
ABA: L may generally only disclose a C’s CI if…
C gives INFORMED CONSENT, or disclosure is IMPLIEDLY AUTHORIZED to carry out the rep, or an EXCEPTION to the duty applies.
If exception applies, L may only disclose only to the extent necessary to meet the exception.
EXCEPTIONS TO DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY
- DEATH OR BODILY
HARM - FINANCIAL LOSS (ABA ONLY)
- ATTORNEY’S DEFENSE
- LEGAL ETHICS ADVICE
- ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS
- COMPLIANCE with Court order or law
DEATH OR BODILY HARM EXCEPTION TO DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY
ABA: L MAY disclose CI to prevent REASONABLY CERTAIN DEATH OR SUBSTANTIAL BODILY HARM.
CA: Same, but Disclosure must be to prevent a FUTURE CRIMINAL ACT that is likely to result in death/substantial bodily harm.
Before disclosure, L must make a GOOD FAITH effort to persuade C not to commit the criminal act or to prevent the crime (if reasonably under the circumstances).
L must also INFORM the C of the L’s ability or decision to reveal the CI.
FINANCIAL LOSS EXCEPTION TO DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY
ABA ONLY!
ABA: L may disclose CI to prevent C from committing a CRIME or FRAUD that is reasonably certain to cause SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL LOSS to a person, if the C IS USING/HAS USED the L’s SERVICES IN FURTHERANCE of the crime/fraud.
Disclosure also allowed to RECTIFY or MITIGATE the fin’ loss if crime is already complete.
ATTORNEY’S DEFENSE EXCEPTION TO DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY
BOTH:
L may disclose CI to COLLECT a LEGAL FEE or DEFEND the L from some charge/claim of wrongdoing (like malpractice).
LEGAL ETHICS ADVICE
EXCEPTION TO DUTY
OF CONFIDENTIALITY
ABA ONLY!
L may disclose CI to obtain confidential legal ethics advise.
NO CA counterpart.
CONFLICTS EXCEPTION TO DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY
(ABA ONLY)
L may disclose CI to DETECT or ADDRESS Conflicts of INTEREST resulting from organizational change.
NO CA counterpart.
COMPLIANCE EXCEPTION TO DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY
L may disclose CI to comply with a COURT ORDER OR OTHER LAW.
ABA: Also, to comply with ethics rule. Another ethics rule may permit or req’ the disclosure (outside reporting orgs, candor to tribunal).
CA: Comply with court order or law. Not available to comply with ethics rule. other ethics rules gen’y do not supersede duty of confidentiality in CA
AC Privilege.
Effect?
Duration?
Allows C to refuse to testify and prevent L from testifying in court about Confidential communciations between them or respective agents.
ABA: AC privilege is perpetual, survives C’s death.
CA: AC privilege TERMINATE when the C’s estate is settled and their personal rep’ is discharged.
EXCEPTIONS TO AC PRIVILEGE
BOTH: * Client seeks the L’s services to enable or aid anyone to commit a future crime or fraud.
* To a communication relevant to an issue of breach of the duties arising out of the lawyer-client relationship.
* In civil litigation between persons who were formerly the joint clients of the attorney.
* In a variety of situations relating to the competency or intent of a client who has attempted to dispose of property by will or inter vivos transfer.
CA- Additional exception:
When disclosure is necessary to prevent a criminal act that the L reasonably believes is likely to result in a person’s substantial bodily injury or death (same as exception for duty of confidentiality).
IMPUTATION OF CONFLICTS
Generally, when one L cannot take on a matter because of a conflict of interest, the other Ls in the firm are also barred from taking on that matter. The conflict is “imputed” from the first L to the other Ls.
EXCEPTIONS to imputed disqualification are:
* When the conflict is PERSONAL to the disqualified L and would not materially limit the representation of the client by the other Ls in the firm.
* When the conflict is based on certain situations involving the disqualified L’s prior representation, employment, etc., and the lawyer is properly SCREENED from the matter and the affected persons are given notice.
Also, Imputation can be waived by the affected client(s).
CURRENT-CLIENT CONFLICTS
A conflict with a CURRENT client exists if either:
(1) The representation of one C will be DIRECTLY ADVERSE to another C who the lawyer represents in the same or a separate matter.
- There is a direct adversity conflict even if the L represents the other client in totally unrelated matters.
- Direct adversity also exists when a lawyer must conduct a harmful or embarrassing cross-examination of an existing client in the course of representing another client.
(2) There is a SIGNIFICANT RISK that the representation of the client will be MATERIALLY LIMITED by the L’s own interest or by the lawyer’s responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person.
The “significant risk of material limitation” conflict is relevant in various situations, including:
- when a L is representing multiple parties on the same side of a matter and the parties have potentially conflicting interests;
- when a lawyer is taking inconsistent legal positions in two cases and the first case is likely to create a controlling precedent in the second case;
- when the lawyer is dealing with a former client conflict that could affect their rep of the current C; or
- when the L has a conflict based on their own financial or other personal interest.
STEPS FOR RESOLVING CURRENT-CLIENT CONFLICT
L may still undertake the represnetation if four conditions are met:
1. L reasonably believes that they can competently and diligently represent the C despite the conflict;
2. Rep is Not prohibited by law;
3. Rep does not involve direct adverse in the same proceeding before a tribunal (L not on both sides of the same litigation)
4. Each affected C gives informed consent, confirmed in writing. (C orally consents, L sends confirmatory memo to C)
* CA requires INFROMED WRITTEN CONSENT (both disclosure and consent must be in writing)
WRITTEN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT FOR LAWYER’S RELATIONSHIPS
(CALIFORNIA ONLY)
Under the CA rules, certain relationships require WRITTEN DISCLOSURE to C:
* L (or another L in firm) has a legal, business, financial, professional, or personal relationship with, or responsibility to, a PARTY OR WITNESS in the C’s matter.
* L (or another L in firm) is an immediate family member of, or lives with, or intimate personal relationship with, or C of the firm of, another party’s ATTORNEY in the C’s matter.
If signficant risk of material limitation bc of the relationship, usual informed writtenc onsent required.