duty of care Flashcards

1
Q

why do we have duty of care?

A

because there can be an indeterminate number of people that are injured as a consequence of someoned actions so we must establish if there was a duty of care owed to that person to limit liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the algorithm that we use for establishing if negligence has occured towards an individual?

A

Donoghue v Stevenson

there must be a duty of care owed to the pursuer (therefore a pre existing duty)

there must be a breach of this duty of care

the breach must have caused a loss to the pursuer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the standard of care that a man must take? case law

A

muir v glasgow corporation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the case for the current law of duty of care? what does it show us?

A

caparo industries plc v dickman

loss of injury is reasonably forseeable

close degree of proximity between the parties

it is fair just and reasonable to impose a duty of care.

this is the first case we go too to establish duty of care

you need all 3 requirements to establish duty of care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

case which shows caparo’s tripartide test

A

Mark rich and co AG v Bishop rock marine co ltd

showed that it was not fair just and reasonable to impose liability on the person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

which case shows where fair just and reasonableness is absent?

A

coleridge v miller construction ltd

company cut off cables when working on them. factory loose power. try to claim damages. glass becomes useless. not fair and just to impose liability on them.
however reasonable foreseeability can also be disputed. can establish the difference between foreseeability and proximity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

case showed proximity

A

Gibson v Orr
has collapsed. police are there. they move. person drives in. gets injured. police created proximity. moved away therefore they bare liability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

where they did not assume resopnsibility.

A

Mitchell v Glasgow City Council

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the case where

A

shows where the proximity is present but the reasonable forseeability is absent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly