Duty of Care Flashcards
Caparo v Diskman
1) Was the class of damage to the claimant reasonably foreseeable?
2) Was there a relationship of proximity between the defendant and claimant?
3) Is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty?
Watson v British Boxing Board
Boxer claimed that medical attention should have been available ringside - upheld due to likelihood of injury and magnitude of potential harm
Donoghue v Stevenson
Duty of care exists between manufacturers and consumer
Nettleship v Weston
Duty of care exists between road users, pedestrians and passengers
Cassidy v Ministry of Health
All medical staff owe a duty of care to their patients
Bull v Devon HA
Hospitals owe a duty of care to each patient
Wilson and Clyde Coal v English
Employers owe a duty of care to their employees
Hall v Simons
Lawyers do not have immunity from negligence claims
Hunter v CC West Midlands
Claimants should appeal criminal convictions rather than sue the lawyer
Jones v Kaney
No immunity of expert witnesses from suit
Kent v Griffiths
Ambulance services owe a duty to patients when a call is accepted
Can be excluded for decisions to attend to more pressing emergency/policy issues
Capital Counties v Hampshire
Fire service under no duty to respond
Church of Jesus Christ and the Latter-Day Saints v West Yorkshire Fire and Civil Defence Authority
No duty owed by fire department unless actively make situation worse than had they not attended
Did not have enough water in hydrants - still no duty
Rigby v CC Northamptonshire
Distinction between policy and operational claims for police
Police officer negligently fired CS gas into claimant’s shop without checking risk of fire
Hill v CC West Yorkshire
Police do not owe a duty regarding actions of criminals, unless a member of the public is in danger above and beyond the rest of the public