Duty of Care Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Caparo v Diskman

A

1) Was the class of damage to the claimant reasonably foreseeable?
2) Was there a relationship of proximity between the defendant and claimant?
3) Is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Watson v British Boxing Board

A

Boxer claimed that medical attention should have been available ringside - upheld due to likelihood of injury and magnitude of potential harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Donoghue v Stevenson

A

Duty of care exists between manufacturers and consumer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Nettleship v Weston

A

Duty of care exists between road users, pedestrians and passengers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cassidy v Ministry of Health

A

All medical staff owe a duty of care to their patients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Bull v Devon HA

A

Hospitals owe a duty of care to each patient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Wilson and Clyde Coal v English

A

Employers owe a duty of care to their employees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hall v Simons

A

Lawyers do not have immunity from negligence claims

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hunter v CC West Midlands

A

Claimants should appeal criminal convictions rather than sue the lawyer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Jones v Kaney

A

No immunity of expert witnesses from suit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Kent v Griffiths

A

Ambulance services owe a duty to patients when a call is accepted
Can be excluded for decisions to attend to more pressing emergency/policy issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Capital Counties v Hampshire

A

Fire service under no duty to respond

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Church of Jesus Christ and the Latter-Day Saints v West Yorkshire Fire and Civil Defence Authority

A

No duty owed by fire department unless actively make situation worse than had they not attended
Did not have enough water in hydrants - still no duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rigby v CC Northamptonshire

A

Distinction between policy and operational claims for police

Police officer negligently fired CS gas into claimant’s shop without checking risk of fire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Hill v CC West Yorkshire

A

Police do not owe a duty regarding actions of criminals, unless a member of the public is in danger above and beyond the rest of the public

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Alexandrou v Oxford

A

Police owe no duty to respond to calls (burglar alarm)

17
Q

Leach v CC Gloucestershire

A

Claimant left traumatised after sitting in on interrogation of criminal - no proximate relationship between her and the police

18
Q

Swinney v CC Northumbria

A

Witness encouraged to give evidence which was stolen from police care
Duty upheld between informant and police

19
Q

An Informer v A Chief Constable

A

Duty between police and informant for personal injury only, not PEL

20
Q

Reeves v Metropolitan Police

A

Police found to have a duty of care to a mentally ill prisoner who committed suicide whilst in custody (high degree of control)

21
Q

Costello v CC Northumbria

A

Claimant was attacked by prisoner while colleagues were outside - duty of care owed

22
Q

Osman v Ferguson

A

Police only have a duty to a potential victim if they knew or ought reasonably to have known that they were at real and immediate risk over and above the rest of the public

23
Q

Stovin v Wise

A

No duty owed by local authorities when driver was injured due to overhanging bank of earth obstructing his view
Reluctance to impose liability since taxpayers will foot the bill

24
Q

Carmarthenshire CC v Lewis

A

Duty owed when proximate relationship established/care and control of school children which contributed to road accident

25
Q

X v Bedfordshire CC

A

No duty owed by local authority to children over abuse claims - high degree of discretion required
Claims regarded special education provisions were allowed

26
Q

W v Essex CC

A

Duty owed by local authority to foster parents after boy in their care abused their daughter - had made assurances they had failed to meet

27
Q

Mulcahy v MoD

A

No duty of care between soldiers engaged in battle conditions

28
Q

Smith v MoD

A

Doctrine of combat construed narrowly

29
Q

Haynes v Harwood

A

Policeman injured himself in attempting to recapture an escapee horse - did not owe a duty to anyone he injured in effecting the rescue
Duty owed by the creator of the danger

30
Q

Cutler v United Dairies

A

Claimant injured in recapturing an escapee horse that had come to rest - not effecting a rescue, therefore no duty owed

31
Q

Smith v Littlewoods

A

No general duty to act

Duty to act if defendant knows of danger on their premises created by third party

32
Q

Stansbie v Troman

A

Duty to act if the defendant creates a dangerous situation - defendant (painter) left the front door open
Duty to act if contractual relationship between claimant and defendant

33
Q

Barrett v MoD

A

Duty to act if pre-existing relationship and defendant assumes responsibility for claimant

34
Q

Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co

A

Duty to act if the defendant has care and control over the third party that caused the loss