Duty of care Flashcards

1
Q

What is a tort?

A

A civil wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Donoghue v Stevenson 1932

A

Established a duty of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Established a duty of care

A

Donoghue v Stevenson 1932

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The duty of care is framed in what?

A

The neighbour principle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The neighbour principle

A

D must take ‘reasonable care’ to avoid an act or omission which would inflict ‘reasonably foreseeable harm’ to their neighbour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

D must take ‘reasonable care’ to avoid an act or omission which would inflict ‘reasonably foreseeable harm’ to their neighbour

A

The neighbour principle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Neighbour

A

someone that will be ‘closely and directly affected’ by the defendant’s actions that they ought to be ‘in contemplation’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

someone that will be so ‘closely and directly affected’ by the defendant’s actions that they ought to be ‘in contemplation’

A

Neighbour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What must be present for a duty of care to exist?

A
  • A foreseeability of harm
  • Proximity between victim and defendant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Caparo v Dickman 1990

A

Created the Caparo test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Case that created the Caparo test

A

Caparo v Dickman 1990

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The Caparo test

A

Must be ‘fair, just and reasonable’ to owe a duty of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Must be ‘fair, just and reasonable’ to owe a duty of care

A

The Caparo test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bourhill v Young 1943

A

Even if harm is reasonably foreseeable, a duty of care will only exist if there is a sufficiently close or proximate relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

even if harm is reasonably foreseeable, a duty of care will only exist if there is a sufficiently close or proximate relationship

A

Bourhill v Young 1943

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Robinson 2018

A
  • The Caparo test should only be applied in a novel situation
  • the court must reason incrementally by analogy using previous precedents and existing statute
17
Q
  • The Caparo test should only be applied in a novel situation
  • the court must reason incrementally by analogy using previous precedents and existing statute
A

Robinson 2018

18
Q

Hill 1990

A

Unless police had created the danger, they would not owe a duty of care because it is not fair, just and reasonable for them to owe a duty of care to someone that is not known to them

19
Q

Unless police had created the danger, they would not owe a duty of care because it is not fair, just and reasonable for them to owe a duty of care to someone that is not known to them

A

Hill 1990

20
Q

Michaels v CC of SW 2015

A

Police do not owe a duty of care to someone who they know is at risk of harm from a third party

21
Q

Police do not owe a duty of care to someone who they know is at risk of harm from a third party

A

Michaels v CC of SW 2015

22
Q

There will only be a duty to warn another person that he is at risk of loss, injury or damage as a result of a third party if D has, by words or conduct, assumed responsibility for the safety of that person

A

Mitchell 2009

23
Q

Mitchell 2009

A

There will only be a duty to warn another person that he is at risk of loss, injury or damage as a result of a third party if D has, by words or conduct, assumed responsibility for the safety of that person