Duties of Directors, Officers, and Shareholders Flashcards
The business judgment rule is
- The essence of business is risk
- a rebuttable presumption that directors and officers who act in good faith, have acted in a non-negligent way, as long as they were adequately informed.
Directors and officers must discharge their duties:
- In good faith;
- With care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would employ; and,
- In a manner they reasonably believe to be in the best interest of the corporation
Duties of Directors and Officers
- Duty of Care
2. Duty of Loyalty
Suppose a party is identified as belonging to more than one of the three main groups (directors, officers, and shareholders) that structurally comprise a particular corporation. In this situation, an analysis of this party’s duties and exposure to liability should
separately consider this party’s duties and liabilities in each of his or her corporate capacities (as director, officer, or shareholder).
Who bears the burden of proving the duty of care?
There is a presumption that an officer/director acts in good faith. Initial burden is on plaintiff to show:
- They did not act in good faith; or,
- On an informed basis
Business judgment rule protects
directors from liability when the corporation suffers as a result of their good faith, informed errors in business judgment.
What does the business judgment rule not apply to
conflict of interest transactions
Duty of Loyalty
Must be loyal to the corporation and not promote their own interests in a manner that is injurious to it.
Conflicts of interest typically arise in three situations, when directors or officers:
- Self-dealing (transact business with corp –> both sides of the transaction)
- Usurp a corporate opportunity; or,
- Directly compete with a corporation.
When a director or officer is involved in a “conflict of interest transaction,” the duty of loyalty requires the director or officer to:
Notify the other directors/officers/shareholders of all material facts regarding the conflict
A “conflict of interest transaction” may violate the duty of loyalty, and be voidable, unless:
Upon full disclosure, non-interested directors or shareholders vote to authorize or approve the transaction.
A conflict of interest transaction may be
voided
An “opportunity” belongs to the corporation if, given the circumstances, fairness dictates that:
the interest of the corporation be protected from the self interested conduct of the officer/director
A determination of whether the opportunity properly belongs to the corporation, should consider
(1) whether the individual became aware of the opportunity while acting in his capacity as a director or officer;
(2) whether the business constituting the opportunity is closely related to that of the corporation;
(3) whether the board had expressed an interest in, or expectancy of, acquiring that type of business; and
(4) whether corporate funds or facilities were used in discovering, developing, or acquiring the opportunity.
if an “opportunity” is deemed to belong to the corporation, no usurpation will be found if the corporation
after full disclosure, rejected the opportunity or was otherwise unable to take advantage of the opportunity.