Duress & Undue Influence Flashcards
What is the effect of duress on a contract?
Makes the contract voidable (ie. innocent party has the right to affirm or terminate)
The only remedy is rescission
What is the effect of undue influence on a contract?
Makes the contract voidable (ie. innocent party can choose to affirm or terminate)
The only remedy is rescission
What is the remedy for duress in contract?
Rescission only (not damages)
(As long as it is not barred - the main bars to rescission are:
A. Affirmation
B. Undue delay
C. A bona fide purchaser
D. Impossible to restore goods or property)
What is the remedy for undue influence?
Rescission only (not damages)
(As long as it is not barred - the main bars to rescission are:
A. Affirmation
B. Undue delay
C. A bona fide purchaser
D. Impossible to restore goods or property)
Which vitiating factors make a contract voidable?
Misrepresentation
Duress
Undue influence
What is duress?
Physical threats
or more commonly
Economic duress
When does economic duress arise?
When there is
- An illegitimate threat which leaves the other party with no practical choice
and
- That threat was factor inducing them to enter the contract or variation
Nb. ‘Illegitimate’ = threat to breach contract, commit a tort etc. - something more than hard bargaining
What factors can be used to determine whether a threat is illegitimate?
For example -
- If there has been an actual or threatened breach of contract
- Whether the threat was made in good or bad faith
- If the victim protested at the time
What is the effect of economic duress on contractual variations?
Contractual variations = promise to pay more for same contractual performance
General rule: performance of an existing contractual duty is not consideration for a promise of extra money
Exception (Williams v Roffey): practical benefit consideration (if performance of existing duty conveys real practical benefit on other party, will be consideration for promise to pay more
BUT regardless of practical benefit consideration, if the promise to pay more was made under economic duress the variation will be voidable (not the original contract)
What is undue influence?
Essentially influence which goes beyond that which is regarded as acceptable
eg. Where one party is in a position of influence over another & takes unfair advantage of that position
There is actual undue influence & also presumed undue influence
In a contract with undue influence, what might the innocent party be able to rely on?
Actual undue influence
- Proven on the facts (difficult to prove because everything usually behind closed doors)
→ More likely, they will be able to show presumed undue influence - must be:
- A relationship of trust & confidence; and
- A transaction that calls for an explanation
What are the elements for presumed undue influence?
Relationship of trust & confidence
- In law: Certain categories of relationship always presumed - eg. solicitor & client, doctor & patient, parent & minor child, religious adviser & followers (but not husband & wife)
- or in fact: Where relationship not presumed to be one of trust & confidence, innocent party must prove this
and
Transaction that calls for an explanation
(eg. party enters into a contract that is not for their benefit or exposes them to risk)
and
There is nothing to rebut the presumption
When will a creditor or lender be tainted with the undue influence of the third party debtor?
If it had actual or constructive notice of the undue influence
Deemed to have constructive notice if:
- The lender was put on inquiry
and
- The lender failed to take reasonable steps to ensure the surety understood the implications
*If they are tainted with undue influence & security documents are set aside, the lender will be an unsecured (rather than secured) creditor - will still have a debt action against the debtor
When is a creditor or lender deemed to have constructive notice of undue influence?
If the creditor was put on inquiry
- Creditors are always put on inquiry where the relationship between the debtor & surety is non-commercial & not for their joint benefit (eg. H & W)
and
Failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that the surety understood the implications
- eg. By a private meeting without the influencing party, by an independent solicitor advising the surety of the inherent risks
A husband wants a loan & the bank will only lend if it gets security in the form of a second mortgage over the home jointly owned by the husband & his wife. The wife signs security documents because of the undue influence of her husband.
The husband defaults on the loan & the bank seeks to enforce their security. The wife alleges undue influence by the husband.
What is the effect on the lender?
If the lender has actual notice of the undue influence, the surety may rescind the surety agreement (unless rescission is barred)
If the lender has constructive notice of undue influence, the surety may rescind the surety agreement (unless rescission is barred) - will have constructive notice if:
- The relationship between the debtor & the surety is non-commercial (the lender is automatically put on enquiry); and
- The lender has failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that the surety understood the implications
If reasonable steps were taken (or if the relationship between the debtor & surety is commercial), the lender can enforce the surety agreement