Duress Of Threats Flashcards

1
Q

The threat must be immediate or almost immediate

A

R v Hasan 2005

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

There must be threat of death or serious injury

A

R v Singh 1973

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The injury must be physical and not pyschological

A

R v baker and Wilkins 1997

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The threat need not be the sole reason for D to commit the offence

A

R v valderama-vega 1985

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Threats to expose D’s sexual immortality are insufficient for the defence of duress

A

R v valderama-vega 1985

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The threat must be to D or family (older law)

A

R v Martin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Threat to anyone whose safety D reasonably regards their self reponsible

A

R v Wright 2000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

D has to be told the crime to commit

A

R v Cole 1994

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The graham test, fill in the blanks

1a. D feared ? Or ? And had ? To do so
1b. The belief must be ? And ? (Hasan)
2. Would the sober, ? Person of ? Fear the threat?

A

Death
Serious injury
Good cause to do so

Reasonable
Genuine

Similar person
Of reasonable firmness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Approved the graham test

A

R v Howe and bannister 1987

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

PTSD can be taken into consideration for characteristics but not Low IQ or excessive vulnerability or timidity

A

R v Bowen 1996

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A personality disorder cannot be taken into consideration

A

R v hegarty 1994

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Intoxication cannot be used as a defence of duress

A

R v flatt 1996

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Duress is not available for murder

A

Dudley and Stephens 1884

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Duress isn’t available for murder whether D is the killer or a second party to the murder

A

R v Howe and bannister 1987

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Duress was used for murder in this case but was soon overturned in R v Howe

A

Lunch v DPP N Ireland 1975

17
Q

There is no defence of duress for attempted murder (obiter of r v Howe )

A

R v Gotts 1991

18
Q

There must be no safe way out

A

R v Gill 1963

19
Q

D is expected to seek police protection

A

R v Pommell

20
Q

D’s age used to be taken into account as to whether D sought police protection

A

Hudson V Taylor 1971

21
Q

Over ruled Hudson v Taylor and it is no longer acceptable to NOT seek police protection

A

R v Hasan 2005

22
Q

If d voluntarily becomes involved in a gang, knowing the crimes they commit they can not use the defence if the gang turns on them

A

R v sharp 1987

23
Q

If D joined a gang innocently they may be able to have the defence of duress (up to jury)

A

R v shepherd 1987

24
Q

Principle in r v sharp is extended to voluntarily associating with a person of violent nature

A

R v Ali 1995

25
Q

Duress is unavailable if D foresaw or should have foresaw that they may be forced to commit an offence by being subjected to threats from an individual or gang

A

R v Hasan 2005

26
Q

Threat is such that it overbears D’s will

A

AG v Whelan 1934