Duress Flashcards

1
Q

Circumstances

A

Threat of death or serious injury
Can be combination of threats but death or serious injury must be present and play major part

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v valderrama-vega

A

Imported cocaine - threat expose homosexuality + kill or injure family
Only threats of death or PI constitute duress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Nexus

A

Must be connection between threat and actual offence committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Cole

A

Rob to pay debt after threatened
Chose method of repaying debt - no threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v graham

A

Kill wife under threat from gay lover - threats not grave
Test:
1. Compelled to act, reasonably believed good reason to fear death/serious injury - subjective
2. Sober person of reasonable firmness, same characteristics act the same way? - obj

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Subjective test

A

Compelled to act, reasonably believed good reason fear death or serious injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v hasan

A

Threat can be to D or D’s immediate family, or someone D responsible for
Must have no opportunity to avoid threat - no time to report or escape without harm
May not be actual imminent threat, D must believe there is one
Self induced duress not a threat e.g associating with criminals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v gill

A

Had time to report violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Objective test

A

Reasonable person can be given some of characteristics of defendant but not all

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Martin

A

Lack of reasonable firmness due to mental illness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Bowen

A

Âge and sex can be taken into consideration but not low iq

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v flatt

A

Characteristics self-induced can’t be taken into consideration (crack cocaine addict)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Howe and r v w

A

13 yr old boy claimed pressure placed on him by father to kill victim
DURESS not defence for murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v gotts

A

No deference to attempted murder charge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Conway

A

Defence allowed to charge of reckless driving where D thought plain clothes officers were about to attack passenger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R v baker and Wilkins

A

CA held defence not available where serious psychological injury feared
Only applies where death or serious bodily harm feared

17
Q

R v pommel

A

Charged with possession of prohibited weapon and allowed defence when claimed handing in to police

18
Q

R v willer

A

Allowed - only drove on pavement due to threat of being chased by gang