Dugga 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Q1 Step 1 A friend of yours, Kim, has successfully applied for both positions and is now asking you for advice. Which position would you argue for, and why?

A

Depends on Kim’s criteria for a job

Kim has several ways of tackling the problem. Do they want an easier job where there is larger room for improvement within the company or do they want a company where they have a more safe position considering potential downsizing?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Q1 Step 2 A friend of yours, Kim, has successfully applied for both positions and is now asking you for advice. Which position would you argue for, and why?

A

Both companies can improve

In terms of better job, both companies has some arguments going for it:
- Both have professionals, harder to learn (Argyris) but MedicCorp is world leading.
- WebComp can easily blame their clients. MedicComp is more used to failure, which can be important for double loop learning.
- At WebComp, knowledge transferring is more integral.
- At medicorp one could argue that knowledge transfer is not as important when developing drug molecules.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Q1 Step 3 A friend of yours, Kim, has successfully applied for both positions and is now asking you for advice. Which position would you argue for, and why?

A

At Webcomp knowledge transfer is more core

Considering the potential risk of downsizing mentioned for both companies, choosing WebComp where the knowledge transfer is more core would be advantageous. Safer for keeping their job.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Q2 Step 1 Write a text on the challenges in estimation caused by covert politics, what kind of doom loop actors could be stuck in and what management can do about it.

A

Challenges in estimation.

  • Hard to make accurate estimations when missing information. If people do not share information or manipulate it, estimations will be distorted.
  • People can make estimations which promote their own agenda instead of benefiting the team.
  • Hiding information (Buchanan, D., & Badham, R. (1999).) → Hard with estimation (Our conclusion)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Q2 Step 2 Write a text on the challenges in estimation caused by covert politics, what kind of doom loop actors could be stuck in and what management can do about it.

A

Doom loops

  • Doom loop: Defensive reasoning leads to more defensive reasoning.
  • Bad estimations lead to failure to meet goals, failure to meet goals lead to despair. This, in turn, fuels further political maneuvering, blame shifting, and potential project failure.
  • Because of brittle personalities (professionals)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Q2 Step 3 Write a text on the challenges in estimation caused by covert politics, what kind of doom loop actors could be stuck in and what management can do about it.

A

What to do

  • Reduce according to Argyris. Increase honesty and openness → Less brittle personalities.
  • Start from the top. “When managers are trained in new reasoning skills, they can have a big impact on the performance of the entire organization.”
  • Carefully consider how to use performance evaluation, not only negative and competitive, also positive and constructive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Q3 Step 1 How would you expect a transformation in a company towards autonomous project teams to influence open disagreement and covert politics in the organization?

A

Autonomous teams

  • In autonomous teams the team is separated from the rest of the organization.
  • The team is smaller and self organized.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Q3 Step 2 How would you expect a transformation in a company towards autonomous project teams to influence open disagreement and covert politics in the organization?

A

Small group

  • Nowhere to hide
  • Actions become apparent.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Q3 Step 3 How would you expect a transformation in a company towards autonomous project teams to influence open disagreement and covert politics in the organization?

A

No manager

  • No manager in autonomous teams makes it harder to blame management. (Argyris)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Q3 Step 4 How would you expect a transformation in a company towards autonomous project teams to influence open disagreement and covert politics in the organization?

A

More responsibility

Since team members have more autonomy and responsibility, they are likely to express their opinions and ideas more freely. Open disagreements become more common.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Q3 Step 5 How would you expect a transformation in a company towards autonomous project teams to influence open disagreement and covert politics in the organization?

A

Lager impact

Team members have a larger impact on the project without needing to resort to covert politics and tactics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Q4 Step 1 Use the literature of Module 5 to discuss and motivate how, in the context of inter-organisational projects, different levels of project complexity and uncertainty can influence the preferred form of organizational coupling.

A

Complexity requires semi-coupling

All inter-organisational projects of some complexity should be at least semi-coupled (Olausson) or what Brusoni et al. (2001) calls loosely coupled, meaning coordination via systems integration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Q4 Step 2 Use the literature of Module 5 to discuss and motivate how, in the context of inter-organisational projects, different levels of project complexity and uncertainty can influence the preferred form of organizational coupling.

A

Inter-organisational projects cannot be tightly coupled

Since we are looking at inter-organisational projects, they cannot be tightly coupled since they would mean that the project was vertically integrated (in one organization).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Q4 Step 3 Use the literature of Module 5 to discuss and motivate how, in the context of inter-organisational projects, different levels of project complexity and uncertainty can influence the preferred form of organizational coupling.

A

Specialization necessary

Since specialization is necessary for complex products, vertical integration is not preferable. (Brusoni)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Q4 Step 4 Use the literature of Module 5 to discuss and motivate how, in the context of inter-organisational projects, different levels of project complexity and uncertainty can influence the preferred form of organizational coupling.

A
  • Brusoni uses PC industry as example of decoupled organizations, while computer count as scope level 2 (Shenhar). A product can be decoupled even with some complexity as long as the interdependencies are predictable and rate of change is even. As well as some uncertainty, computers are medium-tech.
  • One could question if outsourcing of work counts as an inter-organisational project.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Q4 Step 5 Use the literature of Module 5 to discuss and motivate how, in the context of inter-organisational projects, different levels of project complexity and uncertainty can influence the preferred form of organizational coupling.

A

FCAS - high complexity and uncertainty

For example the FCAS project, of high complexity and uncertainty, was loosely coupled.

17
Q

Q5 Step A1
A) Use the course literature on complexity and uncertainty (Module 5) to analyze the levels/types of complexity and uncertainty in this project.
B) Based on the literature from Module 5, discuss how the levels of complexity and uncertainty of the FCAS project are related to the choice of knowledge integration mechanisms implemented in the project?

A

Uncertainty - Super High Tech/High tech

  • Both existing and new tech → Ultimately super high tech
  • Technologies that do not yet exist
  • 6th generation fighter
18
Q

Q5 Step A2
A) Use the course literature on complexity and uncertainty (Module 5) to analyze the levels/types of complexity and uncertainty in this project.
B) Based on the literature from Module 5, discuss how the levels of complexity and uncertainty of the FCAS project are related to the choice of knowledge integration mechanisms implemented in the project?

A

Complexity - System

  • Several interactive elements
  • Aircraft as an example (Shenhar)
19
Q

Q5 Step B1
A) Use the course literature on complexity and uncertainty (Module 5) to analyze the levels/types of complexity and uncertainty in this project.
B) Based on the literature from Module 5, discuss how the levels of complexity and uncertainty of the FCAS project are related to the choice of knowledge integration mechanisms implemented in the project?

A

High complexity -> Knowledge sharing

  • The high complexity of a system requires extensive knowledge sharing. (Shenhar)
20
Q

Q5 Step B2
A) Use the course literature on complexity and uncertainty (Module 5) to analyze the levels/types of complexity and uncertainty in this project.
B) Based on the literature from Module 5, discuss how the levels of complexity and uncertainty of the FCAS project are related to the choice of knowledge integration mechanisms implemented in the project?

A

High uncertainty -> less knowledge sharing

  • The high uncertainty, being a super high tech product, led to companies not wanting to share how things worked, only input and output.
21
Q

Q5 Step B3
A) Use the course literature on complexity and uncertainty (Module 5) to analyze the levels/types of complexity and uncertainty in this project.
B) Based on the literature from Module 5, discuss how the levels of complexity and uncertainty of the FCAS project are related to the choice of knowledge integration mechanisms implemented in the project?

A

Specialization hampers vertical integration

  • May have been too difficult to have all companies, of different competencies, understand how all components worked. Specialization hampers vertical integration (Brusoni).
22
Q

Q5 Step B4
A) Use the course literature on complexity and uncertainty (Module 5) to analyze the levels/types of complexity and uncertainty in this project.
B) Based on the literature from Module 5, discuss how the levels of complexity and uncertainty of the FCAS project are related to the choice of knowledge integration mechanisms implemented in the project?

A

Reasonable with more knowledge integration

  • Would be reasonable to be more choose a more personal knowledge integration and frequent communication, but impossible because of the projects nature (Enberg, C.).
23
Q

Q6 Step 1 What recommendations do you see as applicable on the FCAS case based on Brusoni et al. (2001)? Motivate why or why not they are applicable to the case?

A

Multi-technology projects

Brusoni et al. discuss multi technology projects, FCAS is one such project (Enberg, 2012)

24
Q

Q6 Step 2 What recommendations do you see as applicable on the FCAS case based on Brusoni et al. (2001)? Motivate why or why not they are applicable to the case?

A

Rate of change and interdependencies

  • The rate of change should be uneven because of the large numbers of technologies involved. Long project, some tech will change alot and will be developed from scratch, but some will stay roughly the same.
  • Product interdependencies are high and unpredictable. Unpredictable because of it being a super high tech project, for example the hydromechanical progress slowed down making it more predictable and understood (page 8, brusoni). Super high tech is opposite, thus unpredictable
  • According to the table, it should then be tightly coupled. This does not apply however.
25
Q

Q6 Step 3 What recommendations do you see as applicable on the FCAS case based on Brusoni et al. (2001)? Motivate why or why not they are applicable to the case?

A

Specialization hampers vertical integration

  • Knowledge specialization makes vertical integration difficult. Should be loosely coupled. (Brusoni).
  • Semi-coupling is required in complex and uncertain situations. (Olausson, D. & Berggren, C.)
26
Q

Q6 Step 4 What recommendations do you see as applicable on the FCAS case based on Brusoni et al. (2001)? Motivate why or why not they are applicable to the case?

A

Several companies cannot be tightly coupled

Tightly coupled is not applicable because several companies cooperate as a recruitment for the project.