Due Process/EP Flashcards
Substantive Due Process text
14th amendment (state and local laws)
Substantive Due Process test
- What has the gov’t deprived you of?
- Determine the laws purpose and how well it fits the purported gov’t end sought.
- Is it a fundamental right based on history/tradition or emerging awareness?
- If yes, is there a significant infringement?
If yes to 3 AND 4 –> Strict scrutiny
If no to 3 OR 4 –> rational basis
Substantive due process Strict scrutiny
- Is there a compelling state interest?
- safety/health/national security
No? law fails SS
Yes? Go to 2. - Is the law narrowly tailored to achieve compelling state interest?
- law cannot be over/under inclusive
Substantive due process Rational Basis
- Is there a legitimate state interest?
2. Is the law rationally related to that interest?
Substantive Due Process Analysis steps
- State action
- Fundamental Right?
- History/Tradition?
- RB or SS
- Enabling clause
Substantive Due Process Fundamental Rights
Marry,
Have family
Raise family how you want
Equal Protection Fundamental Rights
Voting
Education
Travel
Substantive Due Process – Abortion
- State action
- Conception -> Viability
- state can regulate abortion so long as the law doesn’t create an undue burden (or substantial obstacle)
AND
- regulation is related to informing the woman or protecting her health - Viability -> on
- state can ban abortion, except where mother’s life is in jeopardy - enabling clause
Equal Protection: Discrimination analysis steps
- State action
- classification scheme on face or as applied?
- who is benefited/burdened?
- purpose of law?
- are the classes similarly situated?
- is there discriminatory intent AND disproportionate impact?
- RB/IS/SS
- Enabling Clause
Discriminatory Intent steps to prove
- Substantial, unexplainable, stark, grossly disproportionate impact
- Historical background (past history of intentional discrimination by D)
- specific (procedural) sequence of events leading up to the challenged action
- timing of the challenged action
- legislative history or contemporaneous testimony by the gov’t
- substantive departures from prior decisions
- foreseeability of disproportionate impact
Equal Protection Intermediate Scrutiny
Gender
Illegitimate children
undocumented alien children’s access to education
Test:
- Important state interest
- Substantially related to gov’t interest
How to get to a suspect class
- unchangeable characteristic
- class lacks ability to protect themselves
- history of discrimination
- characteristic that defines class is irrelevant to its contributions to society
Equal Protection Strict Scrutiny
Race
National Origin
Alienage (some state laws)
Test:
- compelling state interest
- narrowly tailored
- is the law necessary means to the end?
- was there a consideration of race-neutral means?
- was there a consideration of individualized determination?
- was there a consideration of temporary measures/limited duration?
Equal Protection Hybrid Rational Basis
Sexual Orientation
Mental disability
Test:
- legitimate state interest (law not assumed to be valid)
- rationally related (with actual interests of the law)
Equal Protection Past discrimination
same test for affirmative action
Test: remedying past discrimination is compelling state interest
- remedying discrimination of your own?
- is it a precise remedy?
- passive participant in private discrimination