Due Process Clause Flashcards
Slaughter-house case
- The courts reasoning was what “idle” enactment because the clause deals with the rights of citizens of the nation, so “idle” to the states because it is a right citizens already have
- The concern was about federalism and not overstepping their bounds
Sane v roe
- Welfare benefits for residents case
- The statute violated the privileges and immunities clause
- Linked to the right to travel because the statute limited welfare benefits to residents over 12 months
- That meant you couldn’t move there and not have benefits for a year
What is the Due Process Clause?
- Clause used to incorporate provisions of the bill of rights to apply the states
- Procedural DP
- Substantive DP
Twinning v NJ
- Right at issue was against self-incrimination
- Court held that the rights in the first eight amendments are included in due process
Palko v Conn
- Right at issue was double jeopardy
- Court held two prong test: scheme of ordered liberty AND rooted in traditions and conscience
Adamson v CA
- Right at issue was self-incrimination, D refused to testify
- Court held that this portion of the right of self-incrimination is not fundamental because we can take a “piece meal” approach
Duncan v LA
- Right at issue was trial by jury
- Court held this is fundamental to the American scheme of justice
McDonald v City of Chicago
- Right at issue was right to bear arms
- Court held that the Palko test is changed to an OR, so they can rely on a merely historical analysis
- Court held that the second amendment is incorporated
What is Originalism?
-To provide a fixed meaning and constrain judicial discretion
What are the problems with Originalism?
- Problems with originalism:
- -Discretion as to the historical record
- -Discretion as to whether they should follow stare decisis
- -Doesn’t allow for “absurd results”
What are the levels of scrutiny for the due process clause?
- Rational basis=rational relation to legitimate state interest
- Strict scrutiny=compelling state interest
What is the difference between the 5th and 14th amendments?
- 5th amendment = federal
- 14th amendment = states
- Analysis for both is the same
Alleger v Louisiana
- First case where scouts invalidated statue for violating substantive due process
- Old way of dealing with substantive due process, we don’t invalidate economic statutes anymore because trying to impose an economic system is bad
Lochner v New York
- Right to contract under substantive due process
- Liberty prong (Palko)
- The owner of the bakery challenged the statute that regulated hours in bakeries because of right to contract
- Court held law limiting baker hours unconstitutional
Why did the Lochner case “fall?”
-Linked to fall of las e faire system
-Represents a dirty word because we don’t want to impose a political system through constitutional interpretation
now, a very deferential rational basis applies to economic regulations